第一篇：讓孩子模仿小動(dòng)物學(xué)英語更容易

讓孩子模仿小動(dòng)物學(xué)英語更容易

2013年06月18日16:20滬江英語 微博我有話說

“學(xué)英語去”，是目前許多家長[微博]雙休日帶孩子外出學(xué)習(xí)的首選，幼兒園的孩子也紛紛加入到學(xué)英語的行列中，學(xué)習(xí)英語的年齡呈現(xiàn)出越來越小的趨勢。有的家長由于不懂幼兒學(xué)習(xí)語言的特點(diǎn)，讓孩子認(rèn)字母背單詞，結(jié)果是自己教得冒火，孩子學(xué)得吃力。特別是在你火冒三丈大聲訓(xùn)斥孩子的時(shí)候，孩子會(huì)漸漸失去信心，對英語學(xué)習(xí)失去興趣，這種結(jié)果是最可怕的，因?yàn)樗锌赡苡绊懞⒆咏窈蟮膶W(xué)習(xí)態(tài)度。

心理學(xué)家認(rèn)為：興趣具有動(dòng)力作用，也就是說興趣可以轉(zhuǎn)化為激發(fā)人們進(jìn)行某種活動(dòng)的推動(dòng)力。幼兒期的兒童，由于注意力等心理因素發(fā)展不夠成熟，他們的學(xué)習(xí)在很大程度上帶有明顯的情緒化傾向，當(dāng)兒童對學(xué)習(xí)有濃厚興趣和好奇心時(shí)，便會(huì)產(chǎn)生情感上的需求。對孩子來說，英語學(xué)習(xí)是新的認(rèn)知點(diǎn)，家長更應(yīng)考慮孩子情感上的需求，采用生動(dòng)活潑、有趣味的形式來吸引他們。孩子學(xué)習(xí)英語，重要的是創(chuàng)設(shè)一個(gè)輕松愉悅的環(huán)境。爸爸媽媽要有意識地把英語學(xué)習(xí)和游戲結(jié)合起來，如“Wolf，wolf，what time is it?”“It‘s five o’clock。”在游戲中，讓孩子模仿小動(dòng)物，邊做動(dòng)作邊用英語回答，輕松自然地就學(xué)會(huì)了英語句型。在和孩子玩過家家的時(shí)候，問問孩子“What do you like?”讓孩子試著用學(xué)過的單詞說一說。平時(shí)，父母也可以利用一些日常活動(dòng)，如給孩子洗臉時(shí)，一邊洗一邊教孩子念念英語兒歌“Wash your face, Wash your eyes, Wash your nose, Wash your??”這樣既讓孩子覺得好玩，又學(xué)得有趣。帶孩子去超市時(shí)問問孩子”What do you want?”鼓勵(lì)孩子用單詞或句型來回答。當(dāng)孩子能正確說出單詞時(shí)，媽媽的一個(gè)親吻，一個(gè)擁抱，爸爸翹起的大拇指，獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)一張小小的粘紙都會(huì)使孩子產(chǎn)生自信的情感，激起學(xué)習(xí)的興趣。因此爸爸媽媽在教孩子學(xué)英語時(shí)，要不斷地變換形式，采用模仿小動(dòng)物、敲榔頭、敲門、開火車、擊鼓傳花、聽故事、表演等來愉悅兒童學(xué)習(xí)的過程，使孩子學(xué)得興趣盎然。

俗話說合則情生趣有，不合則情失趣無。教孩子學(xué)習(xí)英語對父母來說既是一種耐心的培養(yǎng)，更是智慧的挑戰(zhàn)。

第二篇：TED英語演講稿：如何讓選擇更容易

TED英語演講稿：如何讓選擇更容易

簡介：面對商場里五花八門的商品，你的選擇恐懼癥又犯了嗎? 美國哥倫比亞大學(xué)商學(xué)教授sheena iyengar研究如何讓你在做選擇時(shí)更容易。為了讓你的選擇省時(shí)省力，商家又會(huì)有哪些訣竅呢?

do you know how many choices you make in a typical day? do you know how many choices you make in typical week? i recently did a survey with over 2,000 americans, and the average number of choices that the typical american reports making is about 70 in a typical day.there was also recently a study done with ceos in which they followed ceos around for a whole week.and these scientists simply documented all the various tasks that these ceos engaged in and how much time they spent engaging in making decisions related to these tasks.and they found that the average ceo engaged in about 139 tasks in a week.each task was made up of many, many, many sub-choices of course.50 percent of their decisions were made in nine minutes or less.only about 12 percent of the decisions did they make an hour or more of their time.think about your own choices.do you know how many choices make it into your nine minute category versus your one hour category? how well do you think you're doing at managing those choices?

today i want to talk about one of the biggest modern day choosing problems that we have, which is the choice overload problem.i want to talk about the problem and some potential solutions.now as i talk about this problem, i'm going to have some questions for you and i'm going to want to know your answers.so when i ask you a question, since i'm blind, only raise your hand if you want to burn off some calories.(laughter)otherwise, when i ask you a question, and if your answer is yes, i'd like you to clap your hands.so for my first question for you today: are you guys ready to hear about the choice overload problem?(applause)thank you.so when i was a graduate student at stanford university, i used to go to this very, very upscale grocery store;at least at that time it was truly upscale.it was a store called draeger's.now this store, it was almost like going to an amusement park.they had 250 different kinds of mustards and vinegars and over 500 different kinds of fruits and vegetables and more than two dozen different kinds of bottled water--and this was during a time when we actually used to drink tap water.i used to love going to this store, but on one occasion i asked myself, well how come you never buy anything? here's their olive oil aisle.they had over 75 different kinds of olive oil, including those that were in a locked case that came from thousand-year-old olive trees.so i one day decided to pay a visit to the manager, and i asked the manager, “is this model of offering people all this choice really working?” and he pointed to the busloads of tourists that would show up everyday, with cameras ready usually.we decided to do a little experiment, and we picked jam for our experiment.here's their jam aisle.they had 348 different kinds of jam.we set up a little tasting booth right near the entrance of the store.we there put out six different flavors of jam or 24 different flavors of jam, and we looked at two things: first, in which case were people more likely to stop, sample some jam? more people stopped when there were 24, about 60 percent, than when there were six, about 40 percent.the next thing we looked at is in which case were people more likely to buy a jar of jam.now we see the opposite effect.of the people who stopped when there were 24, only three percent of them actually bought a jar of jam.of the people who stopped when there were six, well now we saw that 30 percent of them actually bought a jar of jam.now if you do the math, people were at least six times more likely to buy a jar of jam if they encountered six than if they encountered 24.now choosing not to buy a jar of jam is probably good for us--at least it's good for our waistlines--but it turns out that this choice overload problem affects us even in very consequential decisions.we choose not to choose, even when it goes against our best self-interests.so now for the topic of today: financial savings.now i'm going to describe to you a study i did with gur huberman, emir kamenica, wei jang where we looked at the retirement savings decisions of nearly a million americans from about 650 plans all in the and what we looked at was whether the number of fund offerings available in a retirement savings plan, the 401(k)plan, does that affect people's likelihood to save more for tomorrow.and what we found was that indeed there was a correlation.so in these plans, we had about 657 plans that ranged from offering people anywhere from two to 59 different fund offerings.and what we found was that, the more funds offered, indeed, there was less participation rate.so if you look at the extremes, those plans that offered you two funds, participation rates were around in the mid-70s--still not as high as we want it to be.in those plans that offered nearly 60 funds, participation rates have now dropped to about the 60th percentile.now it turns out that even if you do choose to participate when there are more choices present, even then, it has negative consequences.so for those people who did choose to participate, the more choices available, the more likely people were to completely avoid stocks or equity funds.the more choices available, the more likely they were to put all their money in pure money market accounts.now neither of these extreme decisions are the kinds of decisions that any of us would recommend for people when you're considering their future financial well-being.well, over the past decade, we have observed three main negative consequences to offering people more and more choices.they're more likely to delay choosing--procrastinate even when it goes against their best self-interest.they're more likely to make worse choices--worse financial choices, medical choices.they're more likely to choose things that make them less satisfied, even when they do objectively better.the main reason for this is because, we might enjoy gazing at those giant walls of mayonnaises, mustards, vinegars, jams, but we can't actually do the math of comparing and contrasting and actually picking from that stunning display.so what i want to propose to you today are four simple techniques--techniques that we have tested in one way or another in different research venues--that you can easily apply in your businesses.the first: cut.you've heard it said before, but it's never been more true than today, that less is more.people are always upset when i say, “cut.” they're always worried they're going to lose shelf space.but in fact, what we're seeing more and more is that if you are willing to cut, get rid of those extraneous redundant options, well there's an increase in sales, there's a lowering of costs, there is an improvement of the choosing experience.when proctor & gamble went from 26 different kinds of head & shoulders to 15, they saw an increase in sales by 10 percent.when the golden cat corporation got rid of their 10 worst-selling cat litter products, they saw an increase in profits by 87 percent--a function of both increase in sales and lowering of costs.you know, the average grocery store today offers you 45,000 products.the typical walmart today offers you 100,000 products.but the ninth largest retailer, the ninth biggest retailer in the world today is aldi, and it offers you only 1,400 products--one kind of canned tomato sauce.now in the financial savings world, i think one of the best examples that has recently come out on how to best manage the choice offerings has actually been something that david laibson was heavily involved in designing, which was the program that they have at harvard.every single harvard employee is now automatically enrolled in a lifecycle fund.for those people who actually want to choose, they're given 20 funds, not 300 or more funds.you know, often, people say, “i don't know how to cut.they're all important choices.” and the first thing i do is i ask the employees, “tell me how these choices are different from one another.and if your employees can't tell them apart, neither can your consumers.”

now before we started our session this afternoon, i had a chat with gary.and gary said that he would be willing to offer people in this audience an all-expenses-paid free vacation to the most beautiful road in the world.here's a description of the road.and i'd like you to read it.and now i'll give you a few seconds to read it and then i want you to clap your hands if you're ready to take gary up on his offer.(light clapping)okay.anybody who's ready to take him up on his offer.is that all? all right, let me show you some more about this.(laughter)you guys knew there was a trick, didn't you.(honk)now who's ready to go on this trip.(applause)(laughter)i think i might have actually heard more hands.all right.now in fact, you had objectively more information the first time around than the second time around, but i would venture to guess that you felt that it was more real the second time around.because the pictures made it feel more real to you.which brings me to the second technique for handling the choice overload problem, which is concretization.that in order for people to understand the differences between the choices, they have to be able to understand the consequences associated with each choice, and that the consequences need to be felt in a vivid sort of way, in a very concrete way.why do people spend an average of 15 to 30 percent more when they use an atm card or a credit card as opposed to cash? because it doesn't feel like real money.and it turns out that making it feel more concrete can actually be a very positive tool to use in getting people to save more.so a study that i did with shlomo benartzi and alessandro previtero, we did a study with people at ing--employees that are all working at ing--and now these people were all in a session where they're doing enrollment for their 401(k)plan.and during that session, we kept the session exactly the way it used to be, but we added one little thing.the one little thing we added was we asked people to just think about all the positive things that would happen in your life if you saved more.by doing that simple thing, there was an increase in enrollment by 20 percent and there was an increase in the amount of people willing to save or the amount that they were willing to put down into their savings account by four percent.the third technique: categorization.we can handle more categories than we can handle choices.so for example, here's a study we did in a magazine aisle.it turns out that in wegmans grocery stores up and down the northeast corridor, the magazine aisles range anywhere from 331 different kinds of magazines all the way up to 664.but you know what? if i show you 600 magazines and i divide them up into 10 categories, versus i show you 400 magazines and divide them up into 20 categories, you believe that i have given you more choice and a better choosing experience if i gave you the 400 than if i gave you the 600.because the categories tell me how to tell them apart.here are two different jewelry displays.one is called “jazz” and the other one is called “swing.” if you think the display on the left is swing and the display on the right is jazz, clap your hands.(light clapping)okay, there's some.if you think the one on the left is jazz and the one on the right is swing, clap your hands.okay, a bit more.now it turns out you're right.the one on the left is jazz and the one on the right is swing, but you know what? this is a highly useless categorization scheme.(laughter)the categories need to say something to the chooser, not the choice-maker.and you often see that problem when it comes down to those long lists of all these funds.who are they actually supposed to be informing?

my fourth technique: condition for complexity.it turns out we can actually handle a lot more information than we think we can, we've just got to take it a little easier.we have to gradually increase the complexity.i'm going to show you one example of what i'm talking about.let's take a very, very complicated decision: buying a car.here's a german car manufacturer that gives you the opportunity to completely custom make your car.you've got to make 60 different decisions, completely make up your car.now these decisions vary in the number of choices that they offer per decision.car colors, exterior car colors--i've got 56 choices.engines, gearshift--four choices.so now what i'm going to do is i'm going to vary the order in which these decisions appear.so half of the customers are going to go from high choice, 56 car colors, to low choice, four gearshifts.the other half of the customers are going to go from low choice, four gearshifts, to 56 car colors, high choice.what am i going to look at? how engaged you are.if you keep hitting the default button per decision, that means you're getting overwhelmed, that means i'm losing you.what you find is the people who go from high choice to low choice, they're hitting that default button over and over and over again.we're losing them.they go from low choice to high choice, they're hanging in there.it's the same information.it's the same number of choices.the only thing that i have done is i have varied the order in which that information is presented.if i start you off easy, i learn how to choose.even though choosing gearshift doesn't tell me anything about my preferences for interior decor, it still prepares me for how to choose.it also gets me excited about this big product that i'm putting together, so i'm more willing to be motivated to be engaged.so let me recap.i have talked about four techniques for mitigating the problem of choice overload--cut--get rid of the extraneous alternatives;concretize--make it real;categorize--we can handle more categories, less choices;condition for complexity.all of these techniques that i'm describing to you today are designed to help you manage your choices--better for you, you can use them on yourself, better for the people that you are serving.because i believe that the key to getting the most from choice is to be choosy about choosing.and the more we're able to be choosy about choosing the better we will be able to practice the art of choosing.thank you very much.(applause)

TED英語演講稿：科技如何幫我閱讀

Ted英語演講稿:Be an Opportunity Maker機(jī)會(huì)創(chuàng)造者

TED英語演講稿：四種影響我們的聲音方式

TED英語演講稿：我們?yōu)槭裁纯鞓罚?/p>

Ted英語演講稿：How I held my breath for 17 minutes如何憋氣17

TED英語演講稿: 如何在社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)濺起水花

TED英語演講稿：墜機(jī)讓我學(xué)到的三件事

TED英語演講稿：解密愛情與出軌

TED英語演講稿：我們?yōu)槭裁匆X

TED英語演講稿：如何跟壓力做朋友

第三篇：如何讓孩子更愛學(xué)習(xí)

1、營造學(xué)習(xí)氛圍

要讓孩子愛學(xué)習(xí)，就要為了促進(jìn)孩子的智力發(fā)展，家長應(yīng)有意識加強(qiáng)自己的智力活動(dòng)，有時(shí)不妨和孩子共同開展智力活動(dòng)。比如，家長愛讀書、看報(bào)，是一種很好的智力活動(dòng)。其中的好處不言而喻，對于不愛讀書的孩子，家長可以先為孩子做個(gè)示范，晚飯后把電視關(guān)掉，一家人各人讀自己的書。在讀書、看報(bào)過程中，不斷把新的信息傳達(dá)給家里人，有時(shí)要談自己的認(rèn)識。長久地熏陶，孩子也會(huì)喜歡讀書、看報(bào)。當(dāng)生活中有些知識不明白時(shí)，應(yīng)該查資料、查工具書，獲得正確答案。家長跟孩子一起做這些事情，有利于孩子增長知識，訓(xùn)練思維，培養(yǎng)能力。如果家長再適時(shí)教給孩子一些閱讀方法，效果會(huì)更好。有的家長在讀書、看報(bào)過程中，劃重點(diǎn)、剪貼感興趣的文章、記讀書筆記，孩子就會(huì)學(xué)著大人的樣子去做。反之，如果在孩子學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)，家長在一旁看電視或上網(wǎng)打游戲，不僅會(huì)影響孩子的注意力，還會(huì)造成他們心理的不平衡。為孩子營造一個(gè)良好的學(xué)習(xí)氛圍，就會(huì)潛移默化地幫助他們養(yǎng)成良好的學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣，這就是所謂的“潤物細(xì)無聲”。

2、灌輸責(zé)任意識

要讓孩子愛學(xué)習(xí)，就要讓孩子明白，學(xué)習(xí)知識，是為了將來在社會(huì)上更好地生存，現(xiàn)在認(rèn)真學(xué)習(xí)是對自己的未來負(fù)責(zé)。一些家長濫用“物質(zhì)刺激”，把孩子是否完成學(xué)習(xí)任務(wù)與物質(zhì)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)聯(lián)系起來。過分重視物質(zhì)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)，對孩子學(xué)習(xí)習(xí)慣的培養(yǎng)，未必是好事。一些物質(zhì)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)僅僅是為了激發(fā)孩子的興趣，但如果孩子只是做了一些分內(nèi)的事情就要給出獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)的話，孩子很快就會(huì)學(xué)會(huì)討價(jià)還價(jià)。

3、培養(yǎng)時(shí)間觀念

要讓孩子愛學(xué)習(xí)，就要給孩子限定時(shí)間可以幫助他們專心地做事情，提高效率。所以把學(xué)習(xí)任務(wù)和時(shí)間聯(lián)系起來，可以提高學(xué)習(xí)效率。比如學(xué)習(xí)一個(gè)生字，給孩子10秒的時(shí)間盯住生字識記，然后再要求默寫出來，這樣一來，孩子有緊迫感，會(huì)很專心地來記。但這要注意張弛有度，不可事事都限時(shí)。比如用餐、沐浴，就不宜限定時(shí)間，該放松的時(shí)候就放松。讓孩子明白工作的時(shí)候要講效率，是我們的主要目的，生活的樂趣卻不能因此而被磨滅。

4、磨練孩子意志

要讓孩子愛學(xué)習(xí)，就要磨練孩子意志可以從練字開始。練字從學(xué)習(xí)角度講，是讓孩子把字寫好，作業(yè)寫工整。實(shí)際上，練字的另一個(gè)好處是可以磨練孩子的意志，讓孩子能夠平心靜氣。具體的做法是讓他們把手洗凈，書桌上的東西清理干凈，讓孩子端端正正，一筆一劃地寫上20分鐘。日子長了，你會(huì)驚喜地發(fā)現(xiàn)，孩子的忍耐力會(huì)有所提升。

第四篇：職業(yè)規(guī)劃讓你更容易成功

職業(yè)規(guī)劃讓你更容易成功

每個(gè)人都渴望成功，通往成功的路也不止一條，正所謂條條大路通羅馬，但總是有人取道捷徑、直搗黃龍，也有人曲折迂回、墮人迷宮，而職業(yè)規(guī)劃也許就是幫助我們到達(dá)羅馬的最好工具。職業(yè)規(guī)劃不僅可以幫助我們解決當(dāng)前求職、就業(yè)、擇業(yè)或者事業(yè)發(fā)展中遇到的困惑，更重要的是幫助我們明確未來的事業(yè)發(fā)展方向。

世界頭號投資大師巴菲特，小時(shí)候是一個(gè)內(nèi)向而敏感的孩子，無論是讀書還是生活中的表現(xiàn)，巴菲特與一般孩子毫無區(qū)別，甚至還不如。許多人都嘲笑巴菲特行動(dòng)、思維緩慢，但巴菲特卻將這一弱點(diǎn)轉(zhuǎn)化為自己最大的優(yōu)點(diǎn)——耐心；同時(shí)，他還發(fā)現(xiàn)自己對數(shù)字有天生的敏感，并對其充滿了興趣。

在27歲之前，巴菲特嘗試過無數(shù)的工作，做銷售、充當(dāng)法律顧問、管理一家小廠，但最終他結(jié)合自己的優(yōu)點(diǎn)——耐心、對數(shù)字敏感，將自己的職業(yè)發(fā)展轉(zhuǎn)向成為一名投資家。在明確的職業(yè)規(guī)劃引導(dǎo)下，巴菲特拒絕許多外來的誘惑，也忍受住許多壓力，堅(jiān)定不移地按著自己的職業(yè)發(fā)展道路前進(jìn)，最終成就一番驚人成就。

職業(yè)規(guī)劃最大好處就在于，幫助我們將個(gè)人夢想、價(jià)值觀、人生目標(biāo)與我們的行動(dòng)策略協(xié)調(diào)一致，去除其他不相關(guān)的旁枝末節(jié)，整合個(gè)人最大的優(yōu)勢與資源，從而向著終極目標(biāo)快速前進(jìn)，而這正是我們?nèi)〉贸晒Φ闹匾ＷC。

無論你是即將步入職場的新人，還是已經(jīng)身在職場數(shù)年，總會(huì)面臨選擇的迷茫：是就業(yè)還是擇業(yè)；是尋求新的挑戰(zhàn)還是繼續(xù)穩(wěn)定的工作。在初級人才過剩、高級人才奇缺的現(xiàn)實(shí)下，這類迷茫越發(fā)顯著。實(shí)際上，這和缺乏明確的職業(yè)規(guī)劃有很大的關(guān)系。而事實(shí)證明，擁有明確目標(biāo)的人往往比缺乏目標(biāo)的人更容易獲得成功。

文章來源：河南職業(yè)規(guī)劃 鄭州職業(yè)規(guī)劃

第五篇：英語演講：父母和孩子誰更容易抑郁

父母和孩子誰更容易抑郁

Today our topic is which of them----teenager or adult----would be easier to depression?in my opinion,there is no doubt that the adults are more suffering from depression---or we can say melancholia[?mel?n?k?ulj?].First,from the physiologic aspect:the age of our parents are most range from 40 to 50----a period we called climacterium[klai?m?kt?ri?m].in this period,the biological hormone of human goes wrong,.The main symptoms are metabolic disorder,wakefulness,easy to lose their temper,palpitate[?p?lp??te?t]

etc.All of this may probably result in a depression.Secondly,from the social aspect: our parents are faced with high pressure.I admit that students are stressful too.But our stress are almost only from two parts:the study and the maybe love.Someone will say we are faced with high pressure of finding a job.In fact,if you can't find a job immediately,you can stay at home for a buffer,at least you will not starve to death the day after your out of work.But the same problem comes to our parents,the answer maybe yes.They are the main support of a family which include one,two,or more children and old men who can't make money.They need to consider how to educate their children,how to take good care of the old's health,how to get along with colleague,how to get a promoting or a better salary,how to pay the house loan,and even how defend their marriage by beating a third.A survey on the internet shows that the group suffer from depression most is the white-collar group.They are faced with high pressure--maybe beyond our imagination.Besides,from our habitual way of thinking,adults have stronger psychology bearing capacity and psychological adjustment ability than teenagers.but just because of this,people often ignore adults' states of mind.If a teenager keeps blue for several days,his parents,teachers and friends are easy to find some unusual,the teenager who has a tendency to depression will get immediate comfort,exhort or even treatment.But if an adult keeps silence,people will think maybe he is just thinking about a difficult problem.Even themselves will not attach so much importance to their psychology.In Chinese traditional ideas,only lunatics [?lu:n?t?k ] need a psychologist.Conclusions As a result,adults are easier to depression than teenagers.We should pay more attention to our parents' psychology.