第一篇：環境優于經濟發展辯論

Good afternoon everyone.We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, in our mind, it is environment growth that should be chosen.China is a developing country, economic development and environmental protection are often conflict.We agree economy growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local region environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great to our existence

We need to do the environment protecting first.My reasons are as followsFirstly, environment protection is the essential requirement of economic development.Economic development is to improve people's living standards, to solve the conflict of people's increasing material and cultural needs.Some measures on economic development especially in heavy industry have a negative impact on the lives of the residents and the situation in the countryside is more dangerous.They are contrary to the original intent of economic development.Secondly, environment protection is the strategy of sustainable development requirements.We live in the environment which our future generations will live in.Suppose that we destroy the environment and the damage is irreparable, this is a crime to the future generations.Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development researchso do our country and to leave our future generations a better living space.Finally, environment protection is a natural requirements.If the damage is huge, we will be severely punished by the nature and cause inevitable consequence like some major floods.We spend more in relief than we earned from the development of economic.The laws of nature is merciless.We must pay more attention on protecting environment.

第二篇：英語辯論環境保護與經濟發展

Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection or

economic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgent

affair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop

our economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of

“first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in a

completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of

development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty

good, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t afford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?

：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food

and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130

million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is also important.And our government has

already realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve some

good results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic and

environmental protection.

第三篇：英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展

英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展(經濟發展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.自由辯論

正方二辯：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live.Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies?

反方二辯：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

正方三辯：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.反方三辯：Environmental protection needs economy.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the

environment.Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important?

正方四辯：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy.We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.反方四辯：We admit economic construction is our country’s principle task.But we have to insist on sustainable development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development.總結：

正方總結：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises.As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration.Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy.If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it.But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust.The urgency like this can’t wait.So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China.Thank you.補充及參考材料

二辯盤問 Two debate questioned 反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經濟是一時之事，環境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經濟 發展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優先權。并不是說經 濟優先就不搞環保了，只是環保處于較次的位置，跟中國現狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環保，但一般縣區還是經濟發展優先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環保，相信大家心知肚明?Sorry, I'm

afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China,?although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely?take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發展經濟優先的話，很可能造成環境成本大于經 濟效益的情況，這樣的經濟是發展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環境保護優先，就能轉虧為盈？我不這么覺得。to cause This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環境的保護是預防為主，防治結合，而預防和治理都要依 靠技術的發展，那請問對方二辯，如果沒有強有力的經濟基礎支持科學技術 發展，那么以科技為支撐的環保從何談起呢？?We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點。科技發展無止盡，經濟發展也沒盡頭，什么 時候算得上是“強有力”呢？但是環境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經濟發展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire? 反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment?自由辯論 正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經濟發展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning??反方一辯：人類祖先確實需要發展經濟，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經濟發展的產物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環境的極度惡化，請問 你怎么看？?Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the

outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it??正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經濟發展就一定會破壞到環境；其次，對方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經濟是科學研究 的基礎。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation?of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？?But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries??正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機器可以運作，生產可以興起，環境總會有 辦法彌補，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the?environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環境然后再去彌補。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經濟建設里程已經證明，先污染后治 理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴重污染 了環境，而我方堅信是可以挽救的。而且事實上，包括核電站在內的很多工 業廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經濟的同時，并沒有放棄環境的保護。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環境保護放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴 抓，才能從根本上阻止環境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實出發，經濟發展必然會付出代價，我們已經在努力 使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應該有個標準吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環境定的，等到他 揭示這個標準時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

第四篇：英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展

英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展(經濟發展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞： we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But the environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經濟是一時之事，環境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經濟 發展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優先權。并不是說經 濟優先就不搞環保了，只是環保處于較次的位置，Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.、反方三辯：請問正方三辯，如果發展經濟優先的話，很可能造成環境成本大于經 濟效益的情況，這樣的經濟是發展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環境保護優先，就能轉虧為盈？我不這么覺得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.反方四辯：你的問題未免抽象了點。科技發展無止盡，經濟發展也沒盡頭，但是環境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方四辯：請問反方四辯，經濟發展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire?

反方一辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經濟發展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

正方總結：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life ？

第五篇：改善經濟發展環境

改善經濟發展環境

改善經濟發展環境

為了認真貫徹落實市委一屆十一次全會精神，為實現“規模推進年”的各項任務目標創造良好的經濟發展環境，由市人大常委會副主任帶隊，協調組織人大內司委、市經貿委等有關部門，組成專題調研組，走訪市直有關部門，深入縣區，對我市經濟建設的政策、法制、服務等環境建設進行了認真的調查研究。現將調研情況報告如下：

一、我市經濟發展環境的現狀

年初以來，我市的經濟發展環境，經過市、縣兩級黨委和政府的共同努力，全市上下方方面面的積極推進和整治，呈現出越來越好的發展態勢。各項優惠政策逐步得到了落實，“三亂”問題得到了

有效遏制，工作效率有所提高，服務質量進一步優化，行政執法逐步規范，監督力度不斷加大，有力地促進了市域經濟和社會事業的健康發展。

1、領導重視層次高，推進力度大。市委市政府高度重視我市的經濟南市展環境工作。年初發綏發[]3號文件下發了《全市整冶經濟發展環境工作方案》，明確了工作總體思路，重點任務，時間步驟，保證措施和要達到的目標。二月份，市委市政府又召開電視電話會議，對全市集中整冶經濟發展環境工作進行了專題部署。此外市人大、政協召開的“兩會”上、市紀委四次全會和市本級規模推進工作會議等大型會議上，市級幾大班子都對改善經濟發展環境工作做出了部署，提出了明確要求。各縣區都成立了由書記為組長，主管經濟工作的副書記為副組長，相關部門為成員單位的改善經濟發展環境專題領導小組，下設專項推進辦公室。層層落實了目標責任，制定了具體的工作措施，建立健全了各項

規章制度。形成了領導小組統一協調、牽頭部門和責任部門齊抓共管的領導機制和組織體系，為改善經濟發展環境提供了強有力的組織保障。

2、宣傳教育工作抓得實，輿論氛圍濃。一是全市廣泛利用各種新聞媒體開展了改善經濟發展環境的宣傳教育活動，極大地調動了廣大干部群眾參與改善經濟發展環境的積極性和主動性，初步形成了領導重視、群眾關心、全社會參與的改善經濟發展環境的濃厚社會輿論氛圍；二是加強了對各級領導干部和工作人員的法律、法規和政策教育，提高了領導者和行政執法人員的政策水平和法律意識；三是強化了對公務員、企業廠長wto知識的培訓，提高了他們的競爭意識和駕馭市場經濟的能力；四是加強了對青少年法制教育，從基礎、源頭上預防了犯罪，減少了社會不穩定因素。

3、法制環境得到有效治理，取得了階段性成果。紀檢監察機關加大了對影響經濟發展的違法違紀案件的查處力度。

上半年，全市共查處破壞經濟發展環境案件64件，處分89人。法院加大了執法和審判工作力度，對涉及經濟犯罪的案件做到了從快從速處理。全市法院系統共受理各類案件29,256件，審結28,508件，結案標的額達億元。兩年來全市法院為企業減緩免訴訟費20多萬元，減負3億元。檢察院加大了對各類犯罪的查處力度，加強了對經濟案件的訴訟監督，主動為企業提供法律服務。，共辦理國有資產流失案件6件，提起抗拆100多件，查辦經濟犯罪120件，挽回經濟損失100多萬元。公安部門加大了“掃黑除惡”和對經濟案件的偵破力度，有效地震懾了犯罪，規范了行政執法人員行為，維護了政治穩定和社會安定。工商、稅務、環保、交通、城建等其它行政執法部門也都從本部門職能出發，制定了多項改善經濟發展環境的措施，受到群眾好評。

4、服務環境有了較大改善，服務質量逐步提高。全市各行政執法、綜合管理、社會服務部門不斷加強隊伍建設，深入開展雙評活動，積極推行政務公開和承諾制，著力提高服務效率和服務水平，樹立了良好的部門形象和行業形象。各地進一步加大了行政審批改革力度，規范了審批行為，減少了審批環節，普遍實行了“一站式”辦公。各縣區還強化了對服務中心的投資建設，大大提高了工作效率。慶安縣實行了行政機關審批事項首問負責制和限時辦結制。全市在各行業開展了治亂減負工作，對企業加大了扶持力度，對域外企業實行零干擾、免打擾。，市本級僅為三精藥業、銀娃乳業、客運樞紐工程減免基礎建設配套費400萬元，減免排污費38萬元。各地還深入開展了對行政執法的評議監督工作。慶安縣的季度評議，肇東市的全行業評議，都是成功的范例。通過評議，對執法部門形成了有效的監督約束機制，促進了服務質量和服務水平的提高。

5、政策環境進一步放寬，對招商引資工作起到了助推作用。全市結合實際制

定有利于企業和外商生產經營的優惠政策文件148份1340多條；共清理文件3000余份，廢止制約經濟發展的政策性文件60多份。肇東市制定了《改善經濟發展環境六項制度》、《肇東市創建優良發展環境“十條禁令”》等多方面的政策措施，在改善經濟發展環境上邁出了較大步伐。慶安縣先后出臺了《慶安縣招商引資優惠政策》、《慶安縣鼓勵房地產開發優惠政策》等，極大地增強了招商引資的吸引力，促進了地方經濟快速發展。我市對招商引資政策進一步放寬，特別是對進入開發區的企業，在辦理手續、土地使用、稅費收繳等方面給予了極大的優惠。一系列政策的出臺和落實，推動了招商引資工作的深入開展。上半年，全市共引進項目226個，到位資金億元，同比增長％。寬松的投資環境，為實現規模推進目標，加快經濟發展提供了強有力的政策支持和動力支持。

二、改善經濟發展環境存在的問題及成因

我市的經濟發展環境雖然有了較大改善，但與發達地區相比，與我市加快發展的要求相比，尚有一定的差距，還存在一些亟待解決的問題。

一是服務意識不強，執法工作的整體水平和執法人員的整體素質有待于進一步提高。有些地方存在說功好、做功差，喊的多、干的少，上熱下冷現象。有些行政職能部門輕管理、輕服務，存有較嚴重的以罰代管，只罰不幫的現象，錯誤地認為管理就是處罰，服務就是收費，導致管理職能弱化和執法目的扭曲。有的行政執法行為不規范，文明執法意識不強。有些執法人員在執法過程中，言行粗魯，態度冷、橫、硬、沖，勒拿卡要報等不正之風較為嚴重，該辦的事頂著不辦，可辦可不辦的事拖著不辦，可這么辦可那么辦的事卡著不辦。有的部門隊伍建設抓得不力，對職工干部疏于教育、疏于管理、疏于監督，導致一些工作人員素質差，不懂政策，不熟業務，甚至違法違紀。

二是行政管理體制不理順，給部門執法帶來了一定難度，同時也導致“三亂”加劇，加重了企業負擔。如審計部門，由于雙重管理體制的束縛，對地方政府和行政執法等部門的審計監督受到了很大限制，難以充分發揮職能作用。還有一些部門在執法過程中，也遇到了同樣問題。我們現行的管理體制，存在差額撥款和自收自支事業單位，自收自支人員比例過高。據調查，市直機關事業單位，全額撥款的3763人，自收自支的3097人，差額撥款的2730人。這些自收自支和差額撥款的事業單位為了保開支，想方設法加重收費。還有的個別單位自行制定收費標準，確定收費項目，使“三亂”現象久禁不止，企業負擔減而不輕。

三是政府職能轉變不到位，個別地方參與競爭，背離了市場經濟規律。政府在市場經濟條件下，一般規則應當是政府調控市場，市場引導企業。便我們有些政府部門還不適應駕馭市場經濟規律的工作方法，不能為企業搭臺唱戲，造成

市場的無序競爭和不平等競爭，違背了市場規律。

四是對行政執法的監督力度不夠。人大的法律監督、政協和人民群眾的民主監督、紀檢部門的紀律監督和新聞單位的輿論監督，這些層級監督都發揮了很大作用，但還須進一步加大力度。目前，這些監督還沒有真正形成制度化，缺乏統一的協調推進機制。行政執法責任追究制度落實不到位，對一些違法違紀問題懲處的力度不夠，往往是大事化小、小事化了，致使一些違法違紀的人和事得不到及時有效查處。

五是基礎設施及公共環境建設投入不足，硬環境建設滯后。據調查，市本級用于基礎設施建設費用3000萬元，占市本級全口徑財政總收入億元的15%。全市人均擁有城市維護建設資金204元，在全省排第8位，處于下游。南方一些發達城市的開發區已經實現了“九通一平”，可我們現在只達到“六通一平”，個別縣“三通一平”也沒有達到，而且標準

較低。全市現有城市綠地面積僅公頃，占建成區面積的%。學校、醫院、公園、商店、賓館、飯店等公共環境建設與發達城市比，明顯落后。公共秩序和公共衛生狀況有待于進一步改善。

通過調查分析，我市經濟發展環境存在問題的主要原因：一是思想觀念滯后。由于在一部分行政管理和執法部門中存在較嚴重的全局與局部利益錯位、管理與服務職能錯位，特別是某些領導干部對改善經濟發展環境思想上存在誤區，沒有樹立環境就是生產力和“人人是環境，事事是環境”的觀念，不能站在全市經濟社會發展的高度抓環境建設，因而導致政府某些部門服務意識淡薄，服務職能弱化，服務質量和水平也存在較大差距。二是部門利益至上。有些有行政執法執罰權的職能部門，為了本部門利益，為了小集團或個人利益，在行政執法中，違規執法、越權執法、有令不行、有禁不止、亂收亂罰，給企業增加了沉重的負擔。三是行政審批制度改革不到

位。在一些部門和單位，行政審批事項該下放的沒有下放，該精簡的沒有精簡，對保留的審批項目缺乏嚴格規范，審批環節過多，審批程序過于繁雜。一些過時的政策，沒有及時清理、修訂，個別地方還存在用已經明令廢止的政策文件收費的現象。四是社會監督機制不健全。目前，還沒有真正形成政府部門為納稅人服務，納稅人有權力監督政府工作的良好社會環境。

三、對策建議

針對我市經濟發展環境存在的問題，我們應立足市情，狠抓當前，著眼長遠，擺正局部和整體、管理和服務、監督和扶持的關系，進一步強化環境意識，樹立環境就是生產力的理念。重點應抓好以下工作：

1、抓領導，確保政令暢通。實踐證明，一個地方的經濟發展環境如何，關鍵在領導。因此，各級領導要把改善經濟發展環境工作擺上更加突出的位置，精心研究部署，層層落實責任，加強督辦檢

查，狠抓工作落實。特別是經濟管理部門、行政執法部門和條條部門的領導，要進一步深化對改善經濟發展環境重要性的認識，從放寬經濟發展環1 2 下一頁