第一篇：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽

正方一辯陳述本方觀點(diǎn)：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標(biāo)看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標(biāo)本兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問題的源頭，要治標(biāo)，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly.To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.反方一辯陳述本方觀點(diǎn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境保護(hù)則是采取一定的政策措施來保護(hù)生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟(jì)要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應(yīng)——那便存在一個問題：自然分給人類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會侵占原本不屬于人類的自然資源。

The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life;environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance.economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.二辯盤問 Two debate questioned

反方二辯：請問對方一辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？

My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方一辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明

Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？

Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯：這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。

This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方四辯補(bǔ)充發(fā)言：as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.so the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.we can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength become strong ,we can spend more money and energy on environment protection,till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護(hù)是預(yù)防為主，防治結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方一辯，如果沒有強(qiáng)有力的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù)發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？

We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方一辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么時候算得上是“強(qiáng)有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。

Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？

Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?

反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live

in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

反方四辯補(bǔ)充發(fā)言：我們生活的環(huán)境，我們的子孫后代也要在這里生活。我們發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)破壞了環(huán)境，有些破壞是無法彌補(bǔ)的，是對子孫后代的犯罪。現(xiàn)在世界各國都已高度重視可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的研究，大力發(fā)展綠色工業(yè)，無公害產(chǎn)業(yè)。我國是具有悠久歷史和文明的大國，在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)過程中更應(yīng)該重視環(huán)境保護(hù)，為子孫后代留下美好的生活空間。The environment we live in, our future generations have to live here.We destroy the environment of economic development, some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime.Now countries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development research, vigorously develop the green industry, and pollution-free industries.China is a civilization with a long history and a big country in the process of economic development should also attach importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a better living space.反方二辯小結(jié)：發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)必須保護(hù)環(huán)境是自然規(guī)律的要求。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中，如果自然環(huán)境受到了嚴(yán)重?fù)p害，那么我們將受到自然的嚴(yán)厲懲罰。重大的洪澇災(zāi)害都是破壞環(huán)境造成的必然結(jié)果。在抗洪救災(zāi)中消耗的人力、物力、財(cái)務(wù)恐怕已超過了犧牲環(huán)境的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展成果。自然規(guī)律是無情的，誰侵犯了它誰將受到它的報復(fù)。我們必須高度重視發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)過程中保護(hù)自然環(huán)境和社會環(huán)境。we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law requirements.The process of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished.Major floods caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result.In the floods in the consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the environment more than the fruits of economic development.The laws of nature is merciless, who violated it who will be its revenge.We must attach great importance to the process of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and social environment

正方二辯小結(jié)：but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength 自由辯論正方一辯：請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？

Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

反方一辯：人類祖先確實(shí)需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染

了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問你怎么看？

Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it? 正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟(jì)是科學(xué)研究的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之間？But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?

正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機(jī)器可以運(yùn)作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有辦法彌補(bǔ)，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之處？Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴(yán)抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實(shí)出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應(yīng)該有個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他揭示這個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.四辯總結(jié)

正方四辯：首先，我是一個支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā)展得以進(jìn)行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護(hù)環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，那么對于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展不利，對于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須強(qiáng)調(diào)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展絕對不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當(dāng)今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental protection.Having a healthy ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development.But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard.At the same time, I must stress that the economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law.While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the concept of sustainable economic development.反方四辯：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望在將來解決環(huán)境問題。

The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival;Furthermore, management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is inefficient, sometimes in a passive position.Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process.Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.

第二篇：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽

正方一辯陳述本方觀點(diǎn)：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標(biāo)看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標(biāo)本兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問題的源頭，要治標(biāo)，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the

symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems

thoroughly.To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure

fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.反方一辯陳述本方觀點(diǎn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物

質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境保護(hù)則是采取一定的政策措施來保護(hù)生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟(jì)要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應(yīng)——那便存在一個問題：自然分給人類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會侵占原本不屬于人類的自然資源。

The economic development refers to society can provide abundant

commodity to improve human material life;environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance.economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.二辯盤問 Two debate questioned

反方二辯：請問對方一辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟(jì)

發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？

My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方一辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng)

濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明

Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to

environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？

Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority

then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic

efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯：這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改

行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。

This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in

each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But

according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then

if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方四辯補(bǔ)充發(fā)言：as a developing country, the economy power is far behind

the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world,but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.so the urgent

affairs of china is developing our economy.Second, economy growth

doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.we can develop

our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy

strength become strong ,we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection,till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering

the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護(hù)是預(yù)防為主，防治結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依

靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方一辯，如果沒有強(qiáng)有力的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù)

發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？

We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and

we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and

control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters,if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology

development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported

by the science and technology.反方一辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么時候算得上是“強(qiáng)有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。

Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly,so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But

environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？

Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development

is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and

entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?

反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既

能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s

expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live

in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and

harmonious natural environment

反方四辯補(bǔ)充發(fā)言：我們生活的環(huán)境，我們的子孫后代也要在這里生活。我們發(fā)

展經(jīng)濟(jì)破壞了環(huán)境，有些破壞是無法彌補(bǔ)的，是對子孫后代的犯罪。現(xiàn)在世界各

國都已高度重視可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的研究，大力發(fā)展綠色工業(yè)，無公害產(chǎn)業(yè)。我國

是具有悠久歷史和文明的大國，在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)過程中更應(yīng)該重視環(huán)境保護(hù)，為子孫

后代留下美好的生活空間。The environment we live in, our future generations

have to live here.We destroy the environment of economic development,some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime.Now countries

around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable

development research, vigorously develop the green industry, and

pollution-free industries.China is a civilization with a long history and a big

country in the process of economic development should also attach

importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a

better living space.反方二辯小結(jié)：發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)必須保護(hù)環(huán)境是自然規(guī)律的要求。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中，如

果自然環(huán)境受到了嚴(yán)重?fù)p害，那么我們將受到自然的嚴(yán)厲懲罰。重大的洪澇災(zāi)害

都是破壞環(huán)境造成的必然結(jié)果。在抗洪救災(zāi)中消耗的人力、物力、財(cái)務(wù)恐怕已超

過了犧牲環(huán)境的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展成果。自然規(guī)律是無情的，誰侵犯了它誰將受到它的報

復(fù)。我們必須高度重視發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)過程中保護(hù)自然環(huán)境和社會環(huán)境。

we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law

requirements.The process of economic development, if the serious damage to the

natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished.Major floods

caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result.In the floods in the

consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the

environment more than the fruits of economic development.The laws of nature is

merciless, who violated it who will be its revenge.We must attach great importance to

the process of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and

social environment

正方二辯小結(jié)：but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities

can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need

high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of

money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can

we protect our environment well without strong economy strength

自由辯論正方一辯：請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可

謂好了吧，而他們

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？

Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s

environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development

is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should

we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

反方一辯：人類祖先確實(shí)需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問你怎么看？

Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer

guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic

development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?

正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所

說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟(jì)是科學(xué)研究的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But

economy is the foundation of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這

些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之間？But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?

正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活

用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機(jī)器可以運(yùn)作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有辦法彌補(bǔ)，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之處？Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什

么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染

了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the

environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積

月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴(yán)抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable

situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實(shí)出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力

使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the

economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應(yīng)該有個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他

揭示這個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.四辯總結(jié)

正方四辯：首先，我是一個支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā)

展得以進(jìn)行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護(hù)環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，那么對于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展不利，對于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須強(qiáng)調(diào)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展絕對不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當(dāng)今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental protection.Having a healthy

ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development.But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic

development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard.At the same time, I must stress that the

economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law.While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the

concept of sustainable economic development.反方四辯：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突

出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望在將來解決環(huán)境問題。

The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival;Furthermore,management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is

inefficient, sometimes in a passive position.Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process.Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.

第三篇：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽

Which should receive priority in china, economic growth or environmental protection？ Theoretical cliché

正方一辯：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標(biāo)看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標(biāo)本 兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問 題的源頭，要治標(biāo)，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly.To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.反方一辯：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境 保護(hù)則是采取一定的政策措施來保護(hù)生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟(jì)要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要 更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應(yīng)——那便存在一個問題：自然分給人 類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會侵占原本不屬于人類的自 然資源。Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life;environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance.economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.二辯盤問 Two debate questioned

反方二辯：請問對方一辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟(jì) 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？ My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方一辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明 Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？ Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯： 這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。To cause this kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護(hù)是預(yù)防為主，防治結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依 靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方一辯，如果沒有強(qiáng)有力的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù) 發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？ We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方一辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么 時候算得上是“強(qiáng)有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？ Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?

反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People’s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

二辯小結(jié)

反方二辯：對方辯友請從事實(shí)出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的, 我們必須堅(jiān)持可持續(xù)發(fā)展，我們發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時。我們必須高度重視在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中的自然環(huán)境的保護(hù)。我們已經(jīng)為我們的環(huán)境付出了很多代價。

Opposite party debates, please to start from the fact, The economic development is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, We have to insist we on sustainable development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development.We pay much for our environment.正方二辯：我們承認(rèn)我們的國家已經(jīng)支付了很多錢，甚至犧牲利潤的環(huán)境，但我們還是應(yīng)該采取經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)作為中心任務(wù)。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力 使代價降到最低。we admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.The economic development will definitely pay the price;we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.自由辯論正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？ Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor’s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

反方一辯：人類祖先確實(shí)需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問 你怎么看？ Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?

正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟(jì)是科學(xué)研究 的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？ But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?

正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機(jī)器可以運(yùn)作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有 辦法彌補(bǔ)，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治 理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after3

pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染 了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工 業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴(yán) 抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.四辯總結(jié)

反方四辯：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突 出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成 本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開 始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望 在將來解決環(huán)境問題。The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival;Furthermore, management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is inefficient, sometimes in a passive position.Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process.Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.正方四辯：首先，我是一個支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā) 展得以進(jìn)行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護(hù)環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，那么對 于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展不利，對于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須 強(qiáng)調(diào)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展絕對不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在 發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當(dāng)今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental protection.Having a healthy ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development.But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard.At the same time, I must stress that the economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law.While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the concept of sustainable economic development.

第四篇：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽

Which should receive priority in china，economic growth or environmental protection？

正方一辯：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標(biāo)看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標(biāo)本

兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問題的源頭，要治標(biāo)，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。

From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly.To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the

technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.反方一辯：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境

保護(hù)則是采取一定的政策措施來保護(hù)生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟(jì)要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應(yīng)——那便存在一個問題：自然分給人類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會侵占原本不屬于人類的自然資源。

The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life;environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance.economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.二辯盤問 Two debate questioned

反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟(jì)

發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？

My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng)

濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明

Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental

protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like

the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to

environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？

Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority

then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic

efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯：這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改

行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。

This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in

each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then

if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護(hù)是預(yù)防為主，防治結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依

靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方二辯，如果沒有強(qiáng)有力的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù)

發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？

We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and

we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters,if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology

development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported

by the science and technology.反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么時候算得上是“強(qiáng)有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。

Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly,so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？

Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development

is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?

反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既

能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。

People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people

tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

自由辯論

正方一辯：請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？

Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s

environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should

we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

反方一辯：人類祖先確實(shí)需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是

經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問你怎么看？

Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the

forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I

want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic

development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage

has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?

正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所

說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟(jì)是科學(xué)研究的基礎(chǔ)。

First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy

the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear

power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the

foundation of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這

些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之

間？

But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how

does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power

station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?

正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活

用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機(jī)器可以運(yùn)作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有

辦法彌補(bǔ)，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之

處？

Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy

millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be

operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什

么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治理是錯的，行不通的。

You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why

management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the

economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染

了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積

月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴(yán)抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。

But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the

environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening

fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實(shí)出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力

使代價降到最低。

Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應(yīng)該有個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他

揭示這個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時，只怕為時已晚了。

Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.四辯總結(jié)

正方四辯：首先，我是一個支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā)

展得以進(jìn)行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護(hù)環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，那么對于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展不利，對于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須強(qiáng)調(diào)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展絕對不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當(dāng)今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental protection.Having a healthy

ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development.But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard.At the same time, I must stress that the

economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law.While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the

concept of sustainable economic development.反方四辯：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突

出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望在將來解決環(huán)境問題。

The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival;Furthermore,management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is

inefficient, sometimes in a passive position.Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process.Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.英語辯論——環(huán)境保護(hù) VS 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展(經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展正方）Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正 方 陳 詞 ： Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s environment growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far

behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t

necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’

environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban

conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.自由辯論 正方二辯：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live.Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our

economies? 反方二辯：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters? 正方三辯：There do exist some eastern cities whose

economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong

economy strength.反 方 三 辯 ： Environmental protection needs economy.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink

polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment.Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy.We admit our country has paid a lot of

money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.反方： admit economic construction is our country’s principle task.But we have to insist We on sustainable

development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic

development.總結(jié)： 正方總結(jié)：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結(jié): Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the

pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises.As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration.Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become

strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy.If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it.But, if the

environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the

resources will exhaust.The urgency like this can’t wait.So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China.Thank you

第五篇：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護(hù)英文辯論賽

Which should receive priority in china，economic growth or environmental protection？ Theoretical cliche 正方一辯：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標(biāo)看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標(biāo)本 兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問 題的源頭，要治標(biāo)，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly.To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems.Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.反方一辯：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境 保護(hù)則是采取一定的政策措施來保護(hù)生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟(jì)要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要 更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應(yīng)——那便存在一個問題：自然分給人 類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會侵占原本不屬于人類的自 然資源。The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life;environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance.economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.二辯盤問 Two debate questioned 反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟(jì) 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？ My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點(diǎn)是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟(jì)優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大家心知肚明 Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟(jì)效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)是發(fā)展還是倒退？ Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯： 這種情況確實(shí)有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業(yè)情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟(jì)效益是負(fù)的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護(hù)優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。to cause This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護(hù)是預(yù)防為主，防治

結(jié)合，而預(yù)防和治理都要依 靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方二辯，如果沒有強(qiáng)有力的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)支持科學(xué)技術(shù) 發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？ We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點(diǎn)。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么 時候算得上是“強(qiáng)有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護(hù)是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？ Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire? 反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment 自由辯論 正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環(huán)境保護(hù)工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？ Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning? 反方一辯：人類祖先確實(shí)需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問 你怎么看？ Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it? 正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟(jì)是科學(xué)研究 的基礎(chǔ)。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？ But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries? 正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機(jī)器可以運(yùn)作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有 辦法彌補(bǔ)，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the

environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補(bǔ)。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明，先污染后治 理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴(yán)重污染 了環(huán)境，而我方堅(jiān)信是可以挽救的。而且事實(shí)上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工 業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護(hù)。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護(hù)放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴(yán) 抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實(shí)出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力 使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應(yīng)該有個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的，等到他 揭示這個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.四辯總結(jié) 正方四辯：首先，我是一個支持環(huán)保的人，擁有一個健康的生態(tài)環(huán)境是可持續(xù)發(fā) 展得以進(jìn)行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護(hù)環(huán)境，而忽視經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，那么對 于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展不利，對于人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須 強(qiáng)調(diào)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展絕對不是破壞環(huán)境，那樣的發(fā)展，也是違背自然規(guī)律的。在 發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的同時，我們要兼顧治理環(huán)境，才是當(dāng)今可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)的理念。First, I am a supporter of environmental protection.Having a healthy ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development.But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard.At the same time, I must stress that the economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law.While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the concept of sustainable economic development.反方四辯：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突 出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成 本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開 始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望 在將來解決環(huán)境問題。The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival;Furthermore, management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is inefficient, sometimes in a passive position.Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process.Only in this

way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.