第一篇：英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展

英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展(經濟發展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞： we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But the environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經濟是一時之事，環境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經濟 發展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優先權。并不是說經 濟優先就不搞環保了，只是環保處于較次的位置，Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.、反方三辯：請問正方三辯，如果發展經濟優先的話，很可能造成環境成本大于經 濟效益的情況，這樣的經濟是發展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環境保護優先，就能轉虧為盈？我不這么覺得。This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.反方四辯：你的問題未免抽象了點。科技發展無止盡，經濟發展也沒盡頭，但是環境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方四辯：請問反方四辯，經濟發展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire?

反方一辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經濟發展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

正方總結：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life ？

第二篇：英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展

英語辯論——環境保護VS經濟發展(經濟發展正方）

Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辯陳詞：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辯陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.That’s all I want to say.自由辯論

正方二辯：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live.Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our economies?

反方二辯：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

正方三辯：There do exist some eastern cities whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China.We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.反方三辯：Environmental protection needs economy.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the

environment.Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important?

正方四辯：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy.We admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit.But we should still take economic construction as the central task.反方四辯：We admit economic construction is our country’s principle task.But we have to insist on sustainable development while developing economy.We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development.總結：

正方總結：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth”.I think what they said can’t come true at present.It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy.反方總結: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy”.The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future.If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises.As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration.Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy.If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it.But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust.The urgency like this can’t wait.So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China.Thank you.補充及參考材料

二辯盤問 Two debate questioned 反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經濟是一時之事，環境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經濟 發展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環境沒了，還能生存嗎？?My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the?environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優先權。并不是說經 濟優先就不搞環保了，只是環保處于較次的位置，跟中國現狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環保，但一般縣區還是經濟發展優先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環保，相信大家心知肚明?Sorry, I'm

afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority.Economy?development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the?environmental protection is just in the inferior position.Just like the present China,?although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely?take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發展經濟優先的話，很可能造成環境成本大于經 濟效益的情況，這樣的經濟是發展還是倒退？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.If economic development receives priority then it is likely?the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在，但并不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業情況不同，我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環境保護優先，就能轉虧為盈？我不這么覺得。to cause This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment.The situation in each industry is different;we cannot draw conclusions from one part.But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.正方二辯： 我們知道環境的保護是預防為主，防治結合，而預防和治理都要依 靠技術的發展，那請問對方二辯，如果沒有強有力的經濟基礎支持科學技術 發展，那么以科技為支撐的環保從何談起呢？?We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點。科技發展無止盡，經濟發展也沒盡頭，什么 時候算得上是“強有力”呢？但是環境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。Your question is a little abstract.Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is?imminent, which can't afford to delay.正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經濟發展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow debaters.The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the?people's universal desire? 反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環境中生存。People`s expectation is not necessarily that good.I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment?自由辯論 正方一辯： 請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，而他們 經濟發展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應該回歸這種生活嗎？?Excuse me, my fellow friends.In the primitive society, human ancestor`s environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return to this kind of life according to your meaning??反方一辯：人類祖先確實需要發展經濟，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經濟發展的產物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環境的極度惡化，請問 你怎么看？?Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer.What I want to ask is, nuclear power station is the

outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it??正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有承諾經濟發展就一定會破壞到環境；其次，對方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經濟是科學研究 的基礎。First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment;second, the situation you said is only rare;third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong.But economy is the foundation?of scientific research.反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？?But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries??正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機器可以運作，生產可以興起，環境總會有 辦法彌補，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of people's living power.With the electricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the?environment.I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環境然后再去彌補。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經濟建設里程已經證明，先污染后治 理是錯的，行不通的。You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it.Why management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴重污染 了環境，而我方堅信是可以挽救的。而且事實上，包括核電站在內的很多工 業廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經濟的同時，并沒有放棄環境的保護。I can not but say that we are really undeserved.It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved.And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環境保護放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴 抓，才能從根本上阻止環境的惡化。But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution.As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation.So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening fundamentally.正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實出發，經濟發展必然會付出代價，我們已經在努力 使代價降到最低。Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.反方三辯：降低應該有個標準吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環境定的，等到他 揭示這個標準時，只怕為時已晚了。Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

第三篇：英語辯論環境保護與經濟發展

Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection or

economic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgent

affair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop

our economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on

environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of

“first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in a

completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of

development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty

good, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t afford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?

：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food

and clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?

：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130

million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is also important.And our government has

already realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve some

good results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic and

environmental protection.

第四篇：經濟發展與環境保護辯論數據

數據：

1、胡錦濤總書記在中央黨校的重要講話中說，現在我們發展上快的問題解決了，但好的問

題并未解決好。

2、污染數據：江河水系70%受到污染，流經城市90%以上嚴重污染，城市垃圾處理率不足

20%，農村1.5億噸垃圾露天存放，三億多農民喝不到干凈的水，四億多城市居民呼吸不到新鮮空氣。

3、社會問題：2005年中國發生5.1萬起環境糾紛，40萬人次投訴和上訪，而且以30%的速

度在遞增。污染嚴重影響人體健康，早已引起人民群眾的不滿，環境不公平，也正在加重著社會不公平。成為社會問題新的不穩定因素。

4、經濟危機：也指自然災害，戰爭造成的生產力猛烈下降，經濟極度混亂和動蕩的現象

5、科學發展觀，第一要務是發展，核心是以人為本，基本要求是全面協調可持續發展，根

本方法是統籌兼顧。

6、國外自然災害：

2003年法國高達40度的熱浪，法國死了三萬多人，2005年南亞大海嘯，死傷更是慘重

7、過度的經濟發展已經造成了全球暖化、溫室效應等，使得海平面上升，就是在上海，四十年后，也將成為水底的遺跡，而更別提二十年后的珠江三角洲面積將只剩下一半。2080年，全世界有10億到32億的人口需要面臨水災，二到七億的人更將成為海龍王的祭品。熱帶雨林正以每秒三個足球場大的速度消失，如此全面且急迫的問題，難道不值得我們嚴正以待嗎？

8.如今經濟發展的領軍產業是信息產業，請問對方辯友知不知道信息產業每年要耗費多少劇毒的化學物質？信息產業僅在1999年，就用了世界上300萬噸劇毒物質來提煉硅，制造芯片，對方辯友不要只看到無邊鈔票滾滾來，看不到一江毒水向東流啊！

9.一是制約經濟發展。世界銀行估算，1995年中國空氣和水污染造成的損失占當年GDP的8％；中科院專家測算，2003年環境污染和生態破壞造成的損失占GDP的15％；據2001年西部生態狀況調查報告，西部9省區生態破壞造成的直接經濟損失占當地GDP的13％。

10.近年來，環保群體上訪和投訴不斷增加。2001年，全國環保系統共收到信件35．3萬封，2002年41萬封，2003年52．6萬封，以每年30％的速度上升；

11.據專家預測，十多年前，環境保護的投入只要達到GDP的1.5%，中國的環境就能夠有所改善，而中國的環保投入卻一直在GDP的0.5%左右徘徊，如今環保投入已經要求占到GDP的3%以上，而我國環保投入才達到總額1.5%。

12.目前1/3的國土被酸雨覆蓋，2/3的草原沙化，近乎100％的土壤板結；江河水系70％受到污染，40％嚴重污染，基本喪失使用功能，流經城市的河流95％以上受到嚴重污染；中國水資源占有量不到世界平均水平的1/5，并且主要水系的2/5已成為劣五類水；全國有一半的人口缺乏干凈飲用水，3億多農民喝不到干凈水，其中超過60％是由于非自然因素導致的飲用水源水質不達標。三分天災七分人禍，環境保護刻不容緩。

人類當代利益和后代利益的協調，地區局部利益和全球整體利益的協調。最后，實現人類利益和自然化境的真正協調。

生態系統的建設和保護是經濟發展的前提和基礎

第五篇：英語作文：經濟發展與環境保護

economic growth and environmental conservation Recently , many areas of china was battered by pretty heavy haze.besides self-mocking,it also makes more and more people realize the importance of keeping the balance between economic growth and environmental conservation.There did be contradictions between the two events.After all,we have to accept that sometimes we do sacrifice environment for the increase of GDP.If it goes on,the environment will break down sooner or later.Then,it will beat back.Global warming is the best proof.The polar bears lost their home,the sand storm continued blowing,the air pollution is increasing sever......In some degree,global warming the development of economic.Compared with developing or undeveloped countries,developed countries are more leisure in the face of environmental problems,After all,they have already went through the period of environmental degradation.Now, the mayor problems faced by the developed countries are high carbon dioxide emissions and abundant fund to deal with the pollution,However, it is everyone’s responsibility to protect the environment.Developed countries should make the best of their superiority to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and share their technology in environmental conservation with developing countries.Furthermore,they should provide funds to help developing countries adapt,particularly the least developed and most vulnerable countries to climate change.On the contrary,the situation of developing countries,especially undeveloped countries are worse.Many countries are struggling to solve the problem of food and clothing.they don’t have time to take environment problem into account.To make things worse,many pollution-belohing factories in developed countries have been shifted to the area of developing countries.They should pay more attention to industrial transformation and technological development.In addition,they could raise public awareness of environmental conservation.Developing countries should not blindly depend on developed countries.Global environment conservation needs global action now.The alarm bells ought to be ringing in every capital of the world.Global environmental degradation threathens our health,our economy,our natural resources,and our children’s future.It is clear we,everyone in the world must act.Just as mentioned above,we should raise out environmental protection awareness.Moreover,we could reject to use disposable goods,take public vehicles,save water and so on.By doing so,I believe the glob we love deeply will become better.