第一篇：新GRE寫作精華句型及

新GRE寫作精華句型及模板

要想在短期內快速提高GRE寫作成績，記一些作文模板無疑是最快捷，高效的一種方法，下面是GRE作文中開頭，正文，結尾的一些經典GRE寫作模板。希望對考生備考有所幫助。

Argument句型

開頭

In this analysis, the arguer claims that … should … To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of … where … In addition, the arguer assumes that … This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.正文：

For instance … since … what’s more … etc.and how well it represented the public opinions..The sample of the survey is not representative.(樣本太小)

the sample is too small to...(光數字沒比例)

the ratio of four to six

there is only figures but no proportion of the survey 還是ratio?

Insufficient Sample

If the [respondents] only stand for a tiny proportion of the whole [group], we should not be so sure about the conclusion that [the whole group…]

The arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization.It was only carried out in Sun City, but the arguer applies its result to all the company’s markets while doesn’t show us whether Sun City is a representative market of the whole markets.有的病人會對抗生素過敏

the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization.Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that就算怎樣，也不怎樣 The survey is based on two isolated examples.The arguer should survey more hospitals of both types.循環假設

The arguer commits a fallacy of begging the question in assuming that …結尾：

other possible causes of the …

To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands.以上即是一些經典的GRE寫作模板，考生備考時可以借鑒，希望考生能加強記憶這些模板，在GRE作文部分定會有質的飛躍。

關注更多GRE備考方法，請登錄新東方在線官方網站：http:///gre/

第二篇：GRE新寫作

GRE新寫作

GRE新寫作2012全面突破備考必讀

一.Analytical Writing Section簡介

邏輯寫作是 General GRE Test考試的三個必考部分之一，它的前身是ETS設計的寫作單項考試AWA(Analytical Writing Assessment)。ETS從02年10月份開始，正式將寫作單項考試并入GRE考試，取代原有的GRE邏輯部分(Analytical Section)。它用于評價考生的邏輯思維和英文寫作能力。即分析問題，闡述立場，論證觀點的能力和獨立的完成一篇中心明確邏輯嚴謹的英文文章的能力。在這里請注意：邏輯寫作不測試學生所掌握的具體知識，以確保對于有不同教育背景的考生的公平性。

新GRE寫作要求考生在30分鐘+30 分鐘內分別完成兩篇文章，它是美國所有作文考試中時間最長而質量要求最高的一類作文考試。此外，GRE作文不僅是普林斯頓的教授給個分就算，它還要我們花 錢將其寄到我們申請的學校，然后由這幫決定我們命運的委員會的委員們嚴格把關，看你是否在科研文章的寫作方面具備一定的水準，因為你們將來的老板對寫作的 要求是比較高的，所以這自然是構成了你能不能得到獎學金的重要標準之一。當然大家也不要怕，GRE寫作的題目是全世界公開的，有點像我們的開卷考試，只要 花一定的精力準備，再加上臨危不懼的心態，一般的中國考生基本都能考到4.5分以上，所以請大家在準備GRE寫作的第一天開始就要具備這種必勝的心態。

從形式上講：

邏輯寫作考試包括兩個不同的部分：

1.Issue task(30min)，要求作者根據所給題目，完成一篇表明立場的邏輯立論文。

2.Argument task(30min)，要求考生分析所給題目，完成一篇駁論文，指出并且有力的駁斥題目中的主要邏輯錯誤。

從特點上講：

1.GRE寫作考試有題庫：

為了達到公平，ETS公布了它考試的所有寫作題庫，那么為了達到能和native speaker一起競爭，考生應該在考前對所有題目都進行預習(節約考試時的審題時間)，并通過100-150個提綱的寫作了解GRE寫作的一般結構，通 過30-50篇寫作來練習自己的寫作思路和表達。對題庫中的題目越熟練，對考試越有利。

2.GRE寫作考試的評閱是計件工作制的：

每個評卷人對你文章的評閱非常快，不可能對每個細節都很仔細地去看。考生應該迎合評卷人的評卷思路，用最規范的結構和最清晰的表達來體現自己的思路：首段要鮮明地提出觀點，中間段落層次要拉開，每段的開始應該就是該段的topic sentence。

3.GRE寫作的評分是整體評分(holistic scoring)：

首先，從ETS公布的各分數段評分標準看，其評分主要注重以下三個方面：①、邏輯分析能力(要求insightful)；②、文章的組織(要求 well-organized)；③、語言能力(要求standard written English;concise;varied structure等)。

但是ETS也強調，評分是整體的，而不是各個角度分別評分。這就說明，雖然中國考生的語言能力偏弱，但是只要 能在其他兩個角度上給評卷人非常impressive的感覺，一樣可以拿到6分。因此，在短期內盡力提高語言能力的同時(語言能力的培養不是一天兩天可以 完成的)，我們在復習時應該盡可能地對題目進行深入的分析，學習高分作文的文章結構，通過這兩個方面的突破來迅速提高作文整體的分數。

4.GRE寫作兩個部分在總分中的權重是一樣的：

由于AA的寫作不牽涉自己觀點的展開，只須指出作者邏輯上的漏洞，因此在經過訓練以后，寫起來并不困難；而AI的寫作需要自己展開自己設立的觀點，不但 需要邏輯上的洞察能力，還需要論證觀點的能力，語言組織的能力，因此對于中國考生來講比較困難，難以短期內有較大提高。但是這兩個部分在總分中的權重是一 樣的，因此考生的策略應該是盡量提高AI部分的寫作能力而力保AA部分滿分(或高分)。因為如果AA部分滿分的話，AI部分只需爭取在4分以上就可以保證 整體作文分數在5分以上。

二.ETS的評分標準以及作文分數的計算

參照ETS 評過分的范文，我們不難發現：無論是ISSUE還是ARGUMENT在評分標準上都有共同之處，即：第一，觀點要有深度，論證要有說服力；第二，組織要有 條理，表達清晰準確；第三，語言流利，句式復雜，詞匯豐富。這三條分別說的是行文的“思想性”、“結構性”和“表達性”，眾多高分作文的考生大凡都在這三 個方面做得很好，我們理所當然也要從這里入手，采取“各個擊破”的方法解剖GRE作文的本質，從而得到一個理想分數。GRE寫作的記分方式是這樣的，兩篇 作文總分都是六分，計算公式為你的得分=(Issue的得分+Argument的得分)/2，最終的計分是以0.5分為一個格。

三.把握備考原則

我們的應考原則是“保住Issue，力爭Argument”。

邏輯寫作總的來看，Issue難度高于Argument。對于考生來說，Issue比Argument要求考生擁有更扎實的寫作功底和更嚴密的邏輯思 維。同時，ETS對于Issue的模板化和plagiarisms更加敏感。總之，獲得Issue高分需要較多的努力。相比之下，Argument內容相 對單一(出錯的邏輯類型比較少)，題目中給了考生更多的提示信息，因此提高Argument成績容易一些。

要獲得滿意的寫作分數，應保證Issue在4.0以上，Argument在5.0以上，這樣總分才能在4.5以上。

四.制定應考計劃：

在制定一份行之有效的復習計劃之前，我們應注意以下幾個方面：

(一)練習的數量：

Issue題庫涉及社會，文化，科技，歷史，政治，藝術，教育，法律，倫理等諸多方面。不同類型的題目有較大的差別，但是在同一類型的題目中卻包含了許 多命題的方向非常接近的題目，比如說： “While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation.”和“The best preparation for life or a career is not learning to be competitive, but learning to be cooperative.”都是說競爭意識與合作意識對于社會或個人的利弊；再比如說：“History teaches us only one thing: knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.” 和“The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives.” 和 “The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history.”都是討論“研究歷史的價值”。這些題目，本質上是一致的，考生完全可以用一篇文章來應對這一類題目。這對于獲得高分有至關重要的作用。

當然，練習這么多的文章需要考生付出相當大的代價。大部分考生都沒有這么充裕的時間。一般來說，針對不同類型的Issue題目，要練習50篇左右。

我們再來說說Argument。Argument題庫內容雖然很大，但就題目中出錯的邏輯類型來說，就顯得較為單一了，比如：第2題---由于 Brookville采用了景觀限制措施，我們Deerhaven Ares也應采用。第16題---鄰省Lucria開設了彩票業務，我們Impecunia也應效仿。第18題---改良了道路并維持55mph的速度限制，我們 Prunty County也應保持55mph的速度限制。

再如：第8題---Mesa Food的食品在一個小地區獲得了成功，我們在全國范圍內推廣其產品的銷售。第19題---Ad Lib在Megalopolis推銷搖滾樂隊的演出門票很成功，因此在全國的巡回演出中也應使用Ad Lib來做門票銷售代理。這5道題目都有共同的邏輯錯誤，“在另外一個地點發生的情況，在本地也必然發生“。考生可以用完全一致的駁斥方法，來駁斥。這一 點，我們在以后幾講中將詳細的介紹給大家。

另外，Argument題目中大都提供了相當豐富的背景信息，所以考生總不至于無話可說。總 而言之，Argument的難度要比Issue低一些，只要考生把各種邏輯錯誤熟練的掌握，并能清楚明白的表述出來，成績一般不會低于4分。Argument題庫中的邏輯錯誤，修文粗略的統計了一下，大概有8、9種，如果考生想要在Argument部分拿到4.5以上的成績，那么針對每種錯誤 類型練習至少要練習3篇，總數在30左右就可以了。

(二)。練習的質量---(從實力化角度提高GRE寫作水平)：

1.大量閱讀

A.讀文章

本書給出的GRE寫作范文，是最好的備考素材，同時GRE閱讀部分的文章也是我們有針對性地閱讀的一個素材庫，要扎扎實實地提高英語寫作水平，就必須要 以扎扎實實的閱讀量為前提之一，必須體會地道的、漂亮的語言是怎么寫出來的，通過對范文的語言內容和邏輯的理解來學習寫作中詞匯的使用、句型的使用。在閱 讀中，你有機會把語言與語言所包含的內容、思維方式聯系起來。范文中的一個詞或者詞組、句式，由于處在具體的語言環境中，你就能體會到它的確切內涵和外 延，以及用法，通過不斷的積累這些好詞好句的用法，你的寫作用詞和煉句的能力就穩步的提高。因此，對于考生來說，不要死記范文，應該怎么利用范文呢？從宏 觀角度說：要從范文中提煉文章的結構和邏輯層級，也就是論證體系。從微觀角度說，要從范文中提煉語言點(詞、短語、句式)。

B.讀歷史、哲學、政治等相關書籍，儲備GRE寫作必須的知識量

GRE寫作之所以有其獨特的魅力，是因為他所考的題目特點涉及大量的哲學觀點、宗教、政治、藝術、社會問題、歷史現象，而且要求考生要有理有據的進行 insightful分析和論證，如何做到insightful, 你就必須對一些哲學觀點有所了解，這樣你自然能夠分析的透徹、論證的很有說服力，同時對相關話題在知識儲備上有所鋪墊，否則將無從說起，無話可說。例如 GRE的Issue部分有這樣一道真題：“Rituals and ceremonies help define a culture.Without them, societies or groups of people have a diminished sense of who they are.” 典禮和儀式有助于確立一種文化，否則人們的社會或群體的角色歸屬感削弱。怎么去理解ritual, 西方社會都有哪些對人影響和大的rituals，rituals和歸屬感為什么有聯系，如何聯系在一起的，這個話題如果不對宗教有所了解，肯定感覺無從下 手。

其次，GRE寫作，有其是Issue寫作對于論據的要求是非常高的，因此你的名人事例的儲備，相關知識量的積累是非常重要的，歷史 長河中的大量的事例是你最有說服力的例證，這一環節也正是GRE考生最為頭疼的一部分，舉不出支持自己的觀點的例子，因此讓自己的文章顯得只有蒼白的論 證，缺乏說服力。因此要多讀歷史，積累例子，有其關注那些重要的哲學家、科學家、藝術家、政治領袖、商業領袖他們的生平事跡、主要貢獻。例如Issue里 的這樣一道真題：“Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are always out of step with their time and their society.”真正影響深遠的思想家和具有高度創造力的藝術家們總是與他們的時代和社會步伐不一致。這個題目你如果沒有必備的那些思想家和藝術家的例 子，文章必然缺乏說服力。因此讀歷史積累寫作素材，具體說就是論據素材是拿GRE作文高分的一個重要環節。

2.研習題庫、寫提綱、練習

Argument部分，首先要熟悉每一個題目，因為題目就是從這題庫中抽取，對于每一個題目找出主要的邏輯錯誤，也就是Argument題目的提綱，同 時每一個邏輯錯誤準備一套語言套路去說，本書的Argument部分對每個邏輯錯誤都給出了詳細的解析，同時提供了詳細的攻擊框架和漂亮的論證語言。寫完 每一個題目的提綱后，寫10-15篇完整的文章(語言能力弱的話，可以增加寫作量)，找partner幫你改，知道錯誤以后重寫。

Issue部分，寫提綱對于這一部分的備考是至關重要的，也是最占用時間、最核心的一個環節，每一個題目的提綱力求詳細，不用去寫開頭段和結尾段，就寫正 文各段你的各個分支觀點，也就是正文部分的論證過程，除了論證以外，寫完后想想可以用些什么論據，把支持論證的論據也寫上。這里，再次強調的是，一定要較 為詳細的寫Issue提綱，否則，在考場如果遇到沒有思考過的題目，很容易亂了陣腳，臨場去想，導致失敗。此外，題目必須考前按題材分類去寫提綱，看懂，知道對立面和大致寫作思路，往往論據在同類的很多題目中通用；寫完提綱后，再寫20-40篇完整的文章(語言能力弱的話，盡量多寫)。2012年4月19日13:05:03

第三篇：新GRE寫作共享

新GRE寫作范文共享

下面為大家搜集總結了一篇優秀的新GRE寫作范文，供大家參考，希望對考生有所幫助。

GRE寫作題目：

Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate.Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.大多數人們認為是事實的信息結果實際上都是不準確的。因此，任何據稱是事實的信息都應該被質疑，因為它在將來很可能會被證明為是錯誤的。

新GRE寫作范文：

Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter.And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance.Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change.No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it.Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts.One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact.An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease.While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well.Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives.Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts.Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree.What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion.Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact.In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.

第四篇：新gre寫作：句式整理

新gre寫作：句式整理

新gre寫作：句式整理

一、是非問題分析論證句式

1.Whereas other societies look to the past for guidance，we cast our nets forward(面向未來)

2.It is the belief in a brighter future that gives us optimism.3.Even these days，when not all progress seems positive，the belief remains that for every problem there is a rational solution.4.The job of the parents is to give the children every opportunity while they are growing up and then get out of their way.5.What deference people in authority do command is based on their actual powers rather than on their age，wisdom，or dignity.6.In a society that changes as fast as ours，experience simply does not have the value that it does in traditional societies

7.It has taken a long time to convince the public that free enterprise does not mean that a company should be free to pollute the air，foul the rivers，and destroy the forests.8.The assembly line reduced workers to cogs of machinery and made their jobs unutterably boring，but it produced goods fast.9.Food is prepackaged and shopping is impersonal，but the efficiency of the operation produces lower prices and less shopping time.11.In America，there are no such expressions such as in china where ―the fat pig gets slaughtered，‖ or in Japan，where ―the nail that sticks out gets hammered down.‖

12.This freedom from the group has enabled the American to become ―Economic Man‖—one directed almost purely by profit motive，mobile and unencumbered(不受阻礙的)by family or community obligations.13.Equipped with the money，one can acquire the taste，style，and ideas that mark each class and launch a quick ascent of the social ladder.14.Actually，persons in status societies who are secure in their niches(適當的位置)are allowed more eccentricity than Americans，who rely heavily on signals that other people like them.15.When half the population goes to college，one cannot expect the colleges to maintain the same standards as in countries where only the elite attend.16.Just as not every Japanese is hardworking and deferential to superiors(長者、上司)，not every Chinese is devoted to family，not every American is ambitious or patriotic – or even unsophisticated.17.No one could seriously think that anyone who grows up poor，lives in a bad neighborhood，and attends an inferior school has an opportunity equal to that of someone more favored.18.Americans may not have achieved equality，but at least they aspire to it，which is more than many other nations can claim.19.In many countries，when jobs become available for young people in distant cities，when television begins to dominate home life，when ready – made foods appear in the markets，the culture appears more ―American‖ – although the resemblance could be entirely superficial.20.When the demand for something is greater than its supply，producers and suppliers will sense the possibility of making a profit – the excess of revenues over expenses is the profit.21.As the case illustrates，competition takes four general forms： pure competition，monopoly，monopolistic competition，and oligopoly(少數制造商對市場的控制).22.The classic example of pure competition occurs with a commodity，like wheat or corn，that has so many producers that no one of them can control its selling price.23.A monopoly occurs when one company alone offers a particular food or service and therefore controls the market and price for it.24.Private restaurants serve gourmet food for $70 per person;incentives boosted agricultural production 25 percent and industrial output 80 percent in just three years;farmers are encouraged to raise as much as they can on their own plots，and some become almost rich in the process.(注意本句中分號的使用)

25.All these changes in China’s economic life have brought changes in China’s social and cultural life as well，many of which unwanted.二、邏輯問題分析論證句式The argument fails to rule out the possibility that a writer engage in both types of writing as well as other types.2.The mere fact that ticket sales in recent years for screenplay-based movies have exceeded those for book-based movies is insufficient evidence to conclude that writing screenplays now provides greater financial opportunity for writers.3It is possible that fees paid by movie studios for screenplays will decrease in the future relative to those for book rights.4.In any event，the advertisement provides no justification for the mutually exclusive choice that it imposes on the writer.5.The argument simply equates success with movie ticket sales，which is unwarranted.6.The author assumes that physical capabilities are the only attributes necessary to operate a motor vehicle.7.Moreover，the author provides no evidence that the realism of color photography is the reason for its predominance.8.This assumption presents a false dilemma，since the two media are not necessarily mutually exclusive alternatives.9.Common sense tells us that a photographer can succeed by working in both media.11.The major problem with the argument is that the stated similarities between Company A and B are insufficient to support the conclusion that Company A will suffer a fate similar to Company B’s.10.Consequently，the mere fact that Company A holds a large share of the video – game hardware and software market does not support the claim that Company A will also fail.11.Thus，the author unfairly assumes that highly – rated public television programs are necessarily widely viewed，or popular.12.While this may be true in some cases，it is equally possible that only companies with products that are already best – sellers can afford the higher ad rates that popular shows demand.13.Admittedly，the vice president’s reasoning linking employee benefits with company profits seems reasonable on the surface.14.One can infer from the survey’s results that a full one – third of the respondents may have viewed the current benefits package unfavorably.15.Lacking more specific information about how these other employees responded，it is impossible to assess the reliability of the survey’s results or to make an informed recommendation.16.It is unlikely that the brief one – week periods under comparison are representative of longer time periods.17.If so，even though 3 percent more accidents occurred after the change，the author’s argument that changing the speed limit increases danger for drivers would be seriously weakened.18.In addition，while it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting，and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth，this is not true of everyone.Moreover，the author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.20.Without knowing the extent and nature of the damage resulting from the bad publicity or the reason for the violation，we cannot accept the author’s conclusion.The author’s proposal is inconsistent with the author’s conclusion about the consequences of adopting an ethics code.22.To begin with，the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash.23.The author’s conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.24.However，this is not necessarily the case.25.The author’s implicit claim that incinerators are economically advantageous to landfills is poorly supported.26.Consequently，unless the author can demonstrate that the city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects，the author’s concern about these issues is unfounded.27.First of all，while asserting that real incomes are rising，the author provides no evidence to support this assertion.為了提高自己的新gre寫作水平而努力的，非常期望這些能夠幫助大家提高在2011新gre寫作表達能力，備考好新gre考試。

第五篇：新GRE寫作例子使用原則

新GRE寫作例子使用原則

相關性很重要，不要提供不相關的信息，和大家眾所周知又對你論證不是非常必要的內容。舉個不恰當的例子，說愛因斯坦和相對論的時候，不需要說愛因斯坦的其他理論;說萊特兄弟發明飛機的時候，沒有必要說他們當時在哪個州。這些看似比較顯而易見，但是如果自己比較隨意，就會有很多不相關的信息傳遞出去。

不能只提供例子，不提供對例子的分析，哪怕只有一句話。例子出現的時刻，應該是分析到了一定程度，水到渠成了自然出現。然后例子之后，最好再加1-2句為什么這個例子能支撐我的觀點，或者是，我們能從這個例子看出什么，或者是，這個例子為什么很重要。這樣就顯得飽滿。

上述就是有關新GRE作文例子使用的問題解答，此外，例子其實不能展得太開。一個觀點段，大概只有6-8句話。那么例子差不多也就2句話。有些例子可能只有一句話，或者只有一個such as blablabla.一定要精練，才能真正的助力GRE作文高分。