第一篇：英文名著讀后感——《巴黎圣姆院》

Notre Dame de Paris Victor Hugo（1802.2.26～1885.5.22)was the leader of romantic literature and the representative of humanism in 19 century.As the “Shakespeare of France ”, he wrote a considerable amount of works, such as les Miserable, Cromwell, Notre-Dame de Paris, etc.These immortal masterpieces established his fame as one of the brightest stars in the history of literature.Quasimodo, an ugly but kind bell-ringer, in one accidental situation by vice-Bishop Klode“rat hole”, when the nuns.When she sees the little shoes, she also took out his amulet mounted on the same inside a small embroidered shoe, so mother and daughter meet.Teresa cut the prison bar, lost possession of his daughter for 16 years into the “rat hole”, mother and daughter immersed in the joy of reunion in the flesh.At that moment, vicar shouted to the warden and guards surrounded the “rat hole.” Maternal love that ranked Seoul had the strength and wisdom;she deceived them into believing that girls have fled.But when than to hear the name, could not help out the window, exposed himself.So mother and daughter were taken to the execution ground, his daughter on the gallows, his mother died at the gallows below.In the end Esmeralda was hanged because of the persecution of Claude.Overwhelming with the feeling of despair, Quasimodo push down Claude from the top of Notre-Dame de Paris, then killed himself beside dead Esmeralda.Esmeralda was so beautiful, so kind-hearted.In my mind, she was the perfect combination of beauty and kindness.Both Quasimodo and Claude adored Esmeralda, but one was an “angel”, the other was a “devil”.As the archdeacon of Notre-Dame de Paris, Claude, respected by others, led an ascetic life.It seemed he was a kind, pious Christian.However, he was sanctimonious.The yearning for sex enjoyment exposed his selfishness, insidiousness and evil to us.He had an outward appearance of angel, but deep down he was a devil.On the contrary, Quasimodo was dumb, deaf, hunchbacked, and as broad as he was tall.Obviously he was as ugly as devil.But he had a heart of gold，and his love was selfishness and pure.In the end, he committed suicide for frustrated love.In my heart, Quasimodo was an angel.However，what is beauty? What is ugliness? Through the novel Hugo taught me a profound lesson: inner beauty is the real beauty.We can't judge a person by his appearance.The beauty of appearance is just skin-deep.A person with ugly appearance has a heart of gold, is he deemed to be “ugly”? Absolutely not!It is the inner heart not the appearance where real beauty exists.Moved by the gold heart of Quasimodo, I will spare no effort to pursue the real beauty, to let my heart grow with the moisture of the true, the good and the beautiful in life.I am sure that the real beauty can thrive in my heart sooner or later.

第二篇：英文名著讀后感——《巴黎圣姆院》

Notre Dame de Paris

Victor Hugo（1802.2.26～1885.5.22)was the leader of romantic literature and the representative of humanism in 19 century.As the “Shakespeare of France ”, he wrote a considerable amount of works, such as les Miserable, Cromwell, Notre-Dame de Paris, etc.These immortal masterpieces established his fame as one of the brightest stars in the history of literature.Quasimodo, an ugly but kind bell-ringer, in one accidental situation by vice-Bishop Klode“rat hole”, when the nuns.When she sees the little shoes, she also took out his amulet mounted on the same inside a small embroidered shoe, so mother and daughter meet.Teresa cut the prison bar, lost possession of his daughter for 16 years into the “rat hole”, mother and daughter immersed in the joy of reunion in the flesh.At that moment, vicar shouted to the warden and guards surrounded the “rat hole.” Maternal love that ranked Seoul had the strength and wisdom;she deceived them into believing that girls have fled.But when than to hear the name, could not help out the window, exposed himself.So mother and daughter were taken to the execution ground, his daughter on the gallows, his mother died at the gallows below.In the end Esmeralda was hanged because of the persecution of Claude.Overwhelming with the feeling of despair, Quasimodo push down Claude from the top of Notre-Dame de Paris, then killed himself beside dead Esmeralda.Esmeralda was so beautiful, so kind-hearted.In my mind, she was the perfect combination of beauty and kindness.Both Quasimodo and Claude adored Esmeralda, but one was an “angel”, the other was a “devil”.As the archdeacon of Notre-Dame de Paris, Claude, respected by others, led an ascetic life.It seemed he was a kind, pious Christian.However, he was sanctimonious.The yearning for sex enjoyment exposed his selfishness, insidiousness and evil to us.He had an outward appearance of angel, but deep down he was a devil.On the contrary, Quasimodo was dumb, deaf, hunchbacked, and as broad as he was tall.Obviously he was as ugly as devil.But he had a heart of gold，and his love was selfishness and pure.In the end, he committed suicide for frustrated love.In my heart, Quasimodo was an angel.However，what is beauty? What is ugliness? Through the novel Hugo taught me a profound lesson: inner beauty is the real beauty.We can't judge a person by his appearance.The beauty of appearance is just skin-deep.A person with ugly appearance has a heart of gold, is he deemed to be “ugly”? Absolutely not!It is the inner heart not the appearance where real beauty exists.Moved by the gold heart of Quasimodo, I will spare no effort to pursue the real beauty, to let my heart grow with the moisture of the true, the good and the beautiful in life.I am sure that the real beauty can thrive in my heart sooner or later.

第三篇：《巴黎圣母院》名著讀后感

《巴黎圣母院》名著讀后感

這本書看完好幾天了，那感覺就像是有一團說不清是什么的東西一直堵在心里，很想找人和自己探討，很想讓它澄清。書里面的經典情節很多很多，那里面展示的很多，我不能一一的重復，就這樣借著幾個點，簡單的說幾句好了，讓我印象深刻的場景是作者筆下的當時的那些建筑，那些奢華的象征權力的教堂，人們還不知道可以擁有自己的思想，以及為了自己的愿望可以做什么事情，一切都假借神圣的宗教，一切都假借神圣的教堂來展現，展現建筑家的審美觀，也就是個人的才華，或者展示自己的能力，我想那時的人們，把人性深深地埋在一件神圣的宗教的外衣下面，典型的人物就是副主教--克洛德。從那許多的錯綜復雜的毫無章法的建筑群，我們不難看出，當時人們的內心是怎樣的壓抑，怎樣狂躁，那些像雨后春筍一般從地下冒出來的教堂的尖頂，正是人們扭曲的靈魂在對著蒼天做這無聲的哀號!

教堂里面是那么的陰森恐怖，這讓人聯想到在宗教的遮攔下，當時社會是怎樣的骯臟和敗壞，真善美的宗教和利用宗教制造血腥事件，形成了強烈的感官刺激。通篇都是在這樣的對照下進行的，讓人的心靈深刻的體會出迷茫，困惑，和不安，如果有一把利劍，你會盡你的全力去刺破那層蒙在社會上空的陰云，那陰云是邪惡的，你對它充滿了憤怒和鄙視，就像書里面的那些流浪漢們對待社會的瘋狂的報復。可是你不能，因為如果你想刺痛那些邪惡，你就先要將代表著真善美的上帝打倒在地，那是多么殘酷的事情啊!還有比人喪失本性更悲哀的么!

印象深刻的是這樣的幾個人物，代表美麗善良的姑娘--愛斯梅拉達。她不僅有迷人的外貌，更有一顆純真善良的心靈，從她對待那只山羊，救下那個落魄的詩人，對于傷害過自己的卡齊莫多，送上的水和憐憫，對待愛情的犧牲，等，我們看到她是美麗的，她的身上心靈上沒有污垢，她是沒有被污染的。可是，這樣的天使一樣的姑娘，受到的是怎么樣的對待呢?流浪，在最骯臟的環境里面生活，被所謂的上流社會排斥和嘲諷，被玩弄，被拋棄，被誣陷，被威脅，最后，作了徹底的犧牲。

書中描寫了一個那樣的社會，和在那個社會生活中的種種人物的狀態，麻木的如那個弗比斯，最底層的如老鼠洞里的那幾個隱修女，瘋狂的副主教，還有盡全力反抗的最丑陋的卡齊莫多，副主教和卡齊莫多形成了人性上的鮮明對比，同樣愛上了美麗的姑娘，同樣的遭到了拒絕，他們的愛都是那么的熱烈，那么的誠摯，可是，一個是占有，一個是奉獻，已占有為目的的，當目的無法達到的時候，他想到的是毀滅，毀滅別人;以奉獻為目的的，當無法奉獻的時候，想到的也是毀滅，毀滅自己。

我想這也就是世界名著的真正魅力所在，他讓人看到的不是一個簡單的故事，他深刻的揭示了人類內心深處的一些活動，無論放在什么時候，什么社會，人的共性是始終存在的，對美好的向往，對美好的追求，對美好的贊美，人是一個天使和魔鬼的綜合體，人和人的經歷沒有相同的，也就是說，社會本身就不可能讓所有人享受到同等的待遇，這種不一樣的待遇，讓多少人的內心失去了平衡，失去了對美好的追求阿!林林總總的骯臟的巧取豪奪，充斥著我們的眼睛，振蕩著我們心靈，我們該怎么辦?

我想每一個人都會有一個屬于自己的答案。

查看更多：

讀《巴黎圣母院》400字

《巴黎圣母院》800字讀后感

巴黎圣母院讀后感400字

讀《巴黎圣母院》有感600字

《巴黎圣母院》讀后感800字

巴黎圣母院讀后感300字

巴黎圣母院讀后感500字

高中巴黎圣母院讀后感：巴黎圣母院

高中巴黎圣母院的讀后感：不絕對的美和丑

高中生優秀讀后感：《巴黎圣母院》讀后感550字

第四篇：名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感

名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感

名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感1

在寒假中，我讀了法國作家維克多·雨果浪漫主義小說《巴黎圣母院》，它講述了一個發生在15世紀中葉的法國的故事：艾絲美拉達是一位純潔熱情的吉普賽少女 ，在巴黎靠賣藝生。不幸的是，巴黎圣母院教堂副主教弗洛羅看上了她，并開始瘋狂地愛上了她。道貌岸然的弗洛羅先是指使卡西莫多去劫持女郎，又因為嫉妒刺傷弗比斯嫁禍給艾絲美拉達，最后得不到愛情的他便置艾絲美拉達于死地。可憐的艾絲美拉達就這樣死去了。后來，圣母院敲鐘人卡西莫多因失去自己的心上人艾絲美拉達而絕望，憤怒地殺死了弗洛羅，追隨她而去。

這本書讓我了解了15世紀法國上流社會的虛偽和下流社會勞動人民的善良、互助與舍己為人。除了艾絲美拉達，卡西莫多也是一個在書中情感豐富的角色：作為敲鐘人的他，雖然面目猙獰，但是卻為人和善、富有正義感。他對艾絲美拉達充滿了愛慕，這種愛慕并不是普通的愛，而是由感激、尊重和同情組成的，一種高潔到值得人贊頌的愛。卡西莫多也是雨果在書中“善良”的象征，在人們的意志中，善良注定要壓倒任何邪惡，卡西莫多便這樣誕生，為人們送去雨果“面容不美麗也可以善良”的思想。

雨果塑造了卡西莫多和艾絲美拉達這兩位“善”與“美”的代表，他們揭露了那個時代法國下層人民的美麗高潔品質，批判了上流人民的腐敗與做作。讓我們一起翻開書，去體驗歷史的滄桑風雨吧。

名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感2

在1482年的巴黎圣母院，上演著一部圍繞美麗淳樸的吉普賽女郎艾絲美蘭達和由主角代理克洛德養大的奇丑無比的敲鐘人卡西莫多，二人共同演繹的震撼人心的愛情故事。

《巴黎圣母院》在雨果的濃墨重彩下表現出強烈尖銳的美丑對比，大大夸張和強化使得國色天香淳樸善良的吉卜賽女郎艾絲美蘭達和奇丑無比以惡報惡的敲鐘人卡西莫多形成了兩個極端。

艾絲美蘭達的善良驅使她從“奇跡王宮”絞刑架上救下了貪生怕死的窮酸詩人格蘭古瓦并與其結成了名義上的夫妻，她的善良讓她不計前嫌，化為恥辱柱下的受刑犯卡西莫多面前的一潭清水，這樣一個仿佛集世間萬千美好于一身的天使怎能叫人不愛！

然而，深受眾人喜愛的少女美貌使得她遭來了“巫女”、“殺人犯”的稱謂，并被裝模作樣的迂腐法官判以死刑。情形只轉而下，這身心完美統一的少女不能再沐浴陽光，在波斯舊地毯上邁動著靈動的舞步，博得眾人歡笑了，失散的母女陰差陽錯之下得以相見，她們忘記了之前的仇恨，全心全意的沉浸在親情的喜悅中。

然而無情冷酷的執法兵隊殘忍的把繩索套在了少女顫抖的纖細脖頸……這一幕幕絢麗而奇異的畫面，引起了人們對她的無限同情，從而產生對封建教會及王權的強烈憤恨。

名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感3

《巴黎圣母院》是雨果寫的第一部大型浪漫主義小說，這部小說是以中世紀的巴黎為背景，揭示了禁欲主義壓抑下的人性的扭曲。

故事發生在十五世紀的法國巴黎，愛斯美拉達是一個十分美麗的女子，她白天靠賣唱為生，晚上就和乞丐王國的窮苦人住在一起，愛斯美拉達傾國傾城的容貌，卻給她帶來了殺身之禍。當奇丑無比的卡西莫多因劫持愛斯美拉達被綁在廣場上的轉盤上示眾，慘遭鞭打，口渴難忍時，愛斯美拉達卻不計前嫌的給他喂水，卡西莫多愛上了這個善良的姑娘。愛斯美拉達愛上了曾經救過她的弗比斯，在和他幽會時，邪惡無比的教主克洛德刺傷了弗比斯，但法庭確認為，愛斯美拉達是兇手，在她被送往絞刑的路上，卡西莫多救下了她，并把她藏于圣母院。國王的衛隊開始進攻圣母院抓回愛斯美拉達，最終，愛斯美拉達被絞死了，而卡西莫多把真正的兇手——克洛德從圣母院頂層扔了下去，自己卻在愛斯美拉達的遺體旁自盡。

這部小說使用對比的手法，愛斯美拉達和卡西莫多，是在于美與丑的對比；卡西莫多和克羅德，是善良和邪惡的對照；弗比斯和卡西莫多，是虛情假意和堅貞不渝的對照。卡西莫多雖然丑，但卻心地善良。克羅德雖然受人愛戴，但他卻有一顆虛偽、邪惡的心。

讀了這篇文章，使我知道了：如果華麗的外表下隱藏著一顆虛偽的心，那怎么裝扮都是丑陋的。我們一定要做一個心地善良的人。

名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感4

美麗而又善良的女神艾絲美拉達，和相貌丑陋卻品德高尚的敲鐘人--卡西莫多，他們演繹著一段傳奇，令人久久不能忘懷，這就是雨果創作的《巴黎圣母院》。

1482年，艾絲美拉達在廣場上歡快的舞著，唱著動聽的歌，使得所有人都被她吸引。與此同時，卡西莫多成為了丑人王被大家簇擁著。卡西莫多被副教主支使去做壞事，傷害艾絲美拉達。但在卡西莫多遭受鞭刑時，艾絲美拉達不計前嫌，用她那顆善良美好的心靈包容了他，讓卡西莫多心中深深的刻下了她的美麗。在這不公平的.時代中誰都得不到絲毫的同情。人們討厭吉普賽人，艾絲美拉達也難逃被誣陷而處決絞刑的命運。她心中那位能保護她的白馬王子，卻眼睜睜的看著她被判死刑。卡西莫多為了救她不顧一切，但是最后悲劇并不能被阻止。

在看完《巴黎圣母院》后，令我感觸最深的就是卡西莫多，他的正直深深地打動著我。他自小因為畸形而被拋棄，由副教主收養，長大后也不曾離開教堂。他從沒有得到過別人的一點關愛，但是他的心靈卻和他的外表大相徑庭。他向往著美和愛情，然而，艾絲美拉達太優秀了，對他來說，艾絲美拉達是一位女神，是高高在上的。他不顧自身的安危都會去保護心目中的女神，他們的這種愛超越了生與死，最終上帝給了他們一個“愛的世界”。

名著《巴黎圣母院》讀后感5

《巴黎圣母院》用樸素的語言講述了法國受宗教黑暗統治時發生的一起起悲劇，引發的一起起慘禍，襯托出那時社會的陰暗面，人們生活的艱辛和危險，稍不小心，還會被認為是巫婆，將會處以死刑。

書中的人物很多，有帥氣的羽林軍弓箭隊長浮比斯，美麗的吉卜賽舞女--愛斯美拉達，失去愛女而隱修的香歌樂女等等。但其中我最喜歡的一名角色還是丑陋但心地善良的敲鐘人--卡西莫多，他為敲鐘，竟然把耳朵給震聾，忠厚、誠實已成了他的代表，他甚至還愿意付出自己的生命，去給愛斯美拉達陪葬。

書中的故事許多，但令我感慨最深的還是卡西莫多冒著生命危險，從刑場上救走了愛斯美拉達，這一行為充滿了危險，如果被旁邊的衛士逮個正著，那么這個“救美”的代價也太不值得了！這么危險的計劃，卡西莫多卻毫無懼怕，在他劫刑場的前一刻，他早已做好了犧牲的準備，他就是犧牲自己也要救出愛斯美拉達，雖然他的外表是那么丑陋，但他有一顆無比善良的心。

中世紀的黑暗生活與我們現在的生活相比，簡直是一個天一個地，生于這個和平年代的我們，要更加珍惜現在這來之不易的生活。

第五篇：巴黎圣母院英文讀后感

About the Notre Dame cathedral 《 Notre Dame cathedral》 is one known far and wide romantic faction strength which Victor Hugo writes.I read this great book these days.In this story, I saw not only friendly relationships and beautiful character, but also the flow selfish desire.Regardless of is good beautiful Asmelada, or has the ugly semblance, Cacimodo with one pure mind, they represent the great amount the lower level populace which suppresses.Perhaps is sinister Coloud, he is appears by the theocracy face, all load bearing one kind of author’s ponder.In this story,I like Cacimodo best.Whatever the book described him ugly,it can’t stop my love of this role.It seems that if someone is a little good to him, he will return you more and more and take you as his god.However, people is so mean to such a little bit.So we are also very easy to understand why Asmelada just gave him some water, he can move to tears.I think he told me the meaning of true.He can bury his own deep love of Asmelada, he knew that he was not good with her, he just hoped he could have quietly by her side to protect her.He could do everything for her.In order to not let Asmelada sad , he didn’t told her that Phoebus has already married though she maybe blame him.In order to her, he try his best to stop beggars broke into Notre Dame.He is a real man!

The book touched me the most is that the nun protect Asmelada in the room.She is a wonderful mother because she protected her daughter in the last minute.In that time, she forgot other identities, only remember that she is just a mother.By reading this book, I thought my life carefully.A person's appearance does not mean anything, the key is what he has and wheather he has a good soul.