第一篇:演講稿開場白要引起對方的好奇心[小編推薦]
演講稿開場白,從心理學原理看,思維與語言是緊密地聯系著的,演講稿開場白語言所表達的是思維活動的結果。如果思維不敏捷不清晰不嚴密,語言的表達也就不可能流暢清楚。一個思維遲鈍而又混亂的人,絕不可能口若懸河滔滔不絕而又條理清晰地表達自己的思想。因此,口才表述水平的提高,很大程度上取決于表述者思維素質和能力的提高。開場白的選擇
第一句往往是最難的,往往又是最重要的。因為你若說得不好,可能會給對方留下一個不好的印象,從而打消了與你繼續交談的興致。
以下幾種開頭方法可供你參考: 說些幽默、有趣的事情,使對方心情放松。引起對方的好奇心。先扼要提出問題的要點。
先把一些非凡事件的結果說出來,使聽者想知道這件事的經過情形,從而引起聽者的好奇心。
先提出一個問題,請對方幫助你共同思考,在取得共同認識的基礎上,再進一步發揮你的話題。
說一些與聽者切膚相關的話。
不要用重復的字眼,話未說出口時,先在腦海里打好一個腹稿,然后根據這個腹稿敘述出來以免表達不流暢。
最重要的是,說話時,字句不可經常疊用。演講稿開場白“為什么”一語,用一次就夠了,有些人卻偏愛說:“為什么為什么為什么”;答應別人某件事時,最多說兩個“好”,如說成“好好好好好好”,那就不精煉了。疊句的使用是為了引人注意,起一種強調的作用,所以,非必要時,這種語句還是少說為佳。
還有些人,由于詞匯貧乏,以致把本來可以豐富的表述,簡單化了。如某些人喜歡用“偉大”這個詞,于是,他的話中什么都“偉大”起來。“你太偉大了”,“這出戲真是偉大”,“我見到一個偉大的場面”,“吃了一頓偉大的午餐”等等。某些字眼不分場合的重復使用,使你的表述顯得呆板、拖沓,明智的做法是,應根據不同的語言環境來變化。
還有一些近乎口頭禪似的字眼,也是不可多用或重疊使用的。如:“那個??那個??”、“基本上??”、“反正”、“就是說??”這類沒有意義的口頭禪是思維出現障礙時用來填空的,目的是引出后面的話。
與口頭禪類似的,還有諸如“自然啦”、“當然啦”、“坦白地說”、“老實說”、“你明白了嗎”、“你說是不是”這一類不必要的話,都造成語句蕪雜的現象。
蘇格拉底曾說:“別說‘我想’,而說‘你想呢?’”他提醒人們千萬不要在表述中“我”字當頭。
因為突出“我”的人,容易給人造成一種自高自大的感覺。“我認為”、“我需要”、“我??”都使人認為你是“自我中心”,從而產生疏遠感。
不要用鼻音說話
用鼻音說話,具有破壞性的效果。尤其是初次與人交談時,往往會給人一種無精打采的厭煩之感。
糾正鼻音必須努力減低心理緊張,演講稿開場白放松你的下顎、舌頭,張開喉嚨,使聲音可以由此散發,而不從鼻孔中遁出。
不要用尖音說話
尖音給人的感覺是不愉快的。因為尖音刺耳,使人神經緊張,容易破壞談話的氣氛。
尖音的消除當然也離不開心理因素,因此要做到心平氣和。此外,平時還應多作放松喉嚨的訓練。下列方法可供你訓練時參考:
1.輕閉雙目,合上嘴唇;2.放松下已,嘴唇仍閉著;3.打一個懶洋洋的大呵欠;4.張大嘴巴及至喉嚨深處,感受到肌肉的伸張,張開喉嚨。
第二篇:演講稿開場白要匠心獨運
演講稿開場白要匠心獨運
文章開頭最難寫,同樣道理,作演講開場白最不易把握,要想三言兩語抓住聽眾的心,并非易事。如果在演講的開始聽眾對你的話就不感興趣,注意力一旦被分散了,那后面再精彩的言論也將黯然失色。因此只有匠心獨運的開場白,以其新穎、奇趣、敏慧之美,才能給聽眾留下深刻印象,才能立即控制場上氣氛,在瞬間里集中聽眾注意力,從而為接下來的演講內容順利地搭梯架橋。
奇論妙語、石破天驚、聽眾對平庸普通的論調都不屑一顧,置若罔聞;倘若發人未見,用別人意想不到的見解引出話題,造成“此言一出,舉座皆驚”的藝術效果,會立即震撼聽眾,使他們急不可耐地聽下去,這樣就能達到吸引聽眾的目的。
海量資料分享
第三篇:演講稿開場白與演講稿開場白要出語驚人
演講稿開場白
近日了解到很多同學不太清楚演講稿怎么寫,因此為大家整理了一些優秀的演講稿范文,請同學們參考。
歌唱比賽演講稿開場白
在繽紛的焰火和歡快的樂曲中,新的一屆……唱歌比賽向我們走來。我們百感交集、思緒萬千。
在新的一屆里,我們有許許多多的事情要做,有許許多多的任務要去完成,我們將面臨新的挑戰和新的機遇。我和全體教職員工以最誠摯的心意、用最吉祥的語言祝福你們,也祝福每一位同學,祝同學們美夢成真,學習進步,身體健康!同學們,陽光將灑在你們的身上,春風將吹在你們的臉上,請堅信,我們將和你們同行,因為我們對你們的愛是那么深沉和執著!
贊揚式演講稿開場白
俗話說“寶劍鋒從磨礪出,梅花香自苦寒來”“不經歷風雨,怎能見彩虹”,這幾句話告訴我們:成功來自于勤奮,只有從小樹立遠大理想,才能成就偉大事業。信念,就是要有志氣,有志向,有雄心壯志。信念是成才的動力。“志不立,天下無可成之事”。
愛國演講稿開場白
大家好,首先請允許我向偉大的祖**親致敬(鞠躬)!隨著歷史的發展和時代的進步,無可否認,中國這一東方璀璨的明珠已傲然屹立于世界人的矚目中;作為炎黃子孫、華夏兒女,我深深的引以為豪!
好的演講稿開場白能夠緊緊地抓住聽眾的注意力,為演講的成功打下基礎,希望匯總的演講稿開場白能夠對大家有所幫助。
演講稿開場白并不需要多么華麗的辭藻,貴在新穎、親切,能夠很快將人們帶入你的演講中去。
學生演講稿開場白
草,對春的態度是拱土而出;花,對夏的態度是翹首怒放;葉,對秋的態度是歸根尋母;木,對冬的態度是休養蟄伏。這一個個態度決定了四季的美景。
失明的雙目無法阻擋海倫·凱勒用對生活的熱愛觀察世界;不健全的大腦無法扼止舟舟用對未來的憧憬指揮交響;貧困的家境無法困住志堅者飛出的翅膀;低微的出身無法綁牢心高者跨越的步伐。不同的人用不同的態度面對現實,會有不同的結果。
婚禮演講稿開場白
大家好!今天我由衷地開心和激動,因為我終于結婚了。一時間縱有千言萬語卻不知從和說起。但我知道,這萬語千言最終只能匯聚成兩個字,那就是“感謝”。首先要感謝在座的各位朋友在這個美好的周末,特意前來為我和xxx的愛情做一個重要的見證,沒有你們,也就沒有這場,讓我和我妻子終生難忘的婚禮。
演講稿開場白要出語驚人
演講稿開場白,演出或其他開場時引入本題的道白,比喻文章、介紹或講話等開始的部分。開場白是否成功,在很大程度上影響著演講的成敗。對開場白的基本要求是簡潔而富有吸引力。
演講稿開場白怎么寫
要知道演講稿開場白怎么寫,首先要明白,常見的開場白類型有以下6種:通過一個與演講主題有密切關系的故事或事件作為演講的開頭的故事式開場白;用精煉的語言交代演講意圖或主題,然后在主體部分展開論證和闡述的開宗明義式開場白;以幽默、詼諧的語言或事例開頭的幽默式開場白;直接引用別人的話語,為展開自己的演講主題作必要的鋪墊和烘托的引用式開場白;能激發聽眾的好奇心,能促使聽眾盡快進入演講者的主題框架的懸念式開場白;把要論及的內容加以適度夸張或從常人未曾想象過的角度予以渲染,以引起聽眾的高度重視的強力式開場白。
演講稿開場白:故事式開場白
演講稿的開頭通過故事跌宕起伏的情節,將聽眾引入一種忘我的境界,并將自己的思想觀點不動聲色地溶入到故事中,起到隨風潛入夜,潤物細無聲的作用,真正達到講故事的目的。用形象性的語言講述一個故事作為開場白會引起聽眾的莫大興趣。選擇故事要遵循這樣幾個原則:要短小,不然成了故事會;要有意味,促人深思;要與演講內容有關。故事式的開場白要避免復雜的情節和冗長的語言。
演講稿開場白:開宗明義式開場白
開宗明義式開場白適合運用于較為正規、莊重的應用性演講場合,它要求演講者具有較好的概括能力。演講者不拖泥帶水,開場便亮相,從而給聽眾留下了深刻印象。
演講稿開場白:幽默式開場白
幽默式是以幽默、詼諧的語言或事例作為演講的開場白,它能使聽眾在輕松愉快之中很快進人演講接受者的角色,使聽眾倍感親切,無形中縮短了與聽眾間的距離。
演講稿開場白:引用式開場白
第四篇::回復對方要來訪的商務信件
范文:回復對方要來訪的商務信件
Dear Mr./ Ms,Thank you for your letter informing us of Mr.Green's visit during June 2-7.Unfortunately, Mr.Edwards, our manager, is now in Cairo and will not be back until the second half of June.He would, however, be pleased to see Mr.Green any time after his return.We look forward to hearing from you.Yours faithfully,尊敬的先生/小姐
謝謝來函告知我方六月2-7日格林先生的來訪。不巧,我們的總經理艾得華先生現正在巴黎,到六月中旬才能回來。但他回來后愿意在任何時間會見格林先生。
希望收到您的來信。
您誠摯的
第五篇:演講稿開場白
經典演講稿開場白
經典演講稿師德演講稿--愛與責任
世上有很多東西,給予他人的同時,自己往往是越來越少,而唯有一樣東西卻是越給越多。您也許會驚奇地問我:“那是什么呢?”我將毫不遲疑的回答您:“那就是愛!”愛,不是索取,不是等價交換,愛是付出,是自我犧牲。只有在愛的基礎上,教師才會投入他的全部力量,才會把他的青春、智慧無怨無悔地獻給學生,獻給教育事業.師愛,是教育力量的源泉,是教育成功的基礎,是教師的天職與責任。今年4月,我有幸在人民大會堂聆聽了方永剛先進事跡報告會,感受到了這位“平民理論家”對學生的愛,對事業的愛。
2006年11月17日,結腸癌手術6小時后,方永剛從麻醉中醒來,第一句話問的是他的研究生:你的畢業論文準備得怎么樣了?
隨后幾天,方永剛又讓妻子把自己的3個研究生叫到病房。沒有講臺、沒有黑板、沒有課桌,方永剛坐在病床上給學生們上課。即使不一會兒就臉色發白,汗珠成串往下掉,他也不肯停下來。
做完第二次化療,方永剛惦記著自己還有幾次課沒上完,要回去上課。系領導不同意,方永剛急了:“我肚子有問題,但腦子沒問題,嘴沒問題!如果離開了講臺,我可能真的會倒下。”說著說著他竟然哭了。在人生磨難面前,他沒有掉淚;在傷病痛苦面前,他沒有掉淚;在死神威脅面前,他也沒有掉淚;但因為上不了心愛的講臺,這個頂天立地的男子漢卻留下了兩行熱淚。他的淚水讓我們真正明白了什么是教師的品德。
終于,經過再
一、再
二、再三的請求,2007年1月15日,在第二次和第三次化療的間隙,方永剛回到離開了兩個多月的教室。看到學生們,方永剛眼里閃爍出欣慰和滿足,那眼神似乎是說:同學們,我終于又見到你們了!
這堂課,方永剛講的是《新世紀新階段我軍歷史使命》。
整整軍裝,開場白只有一句話:只要我還能站著,就要為大家講課,這是我的使命。
同學們強忍淚水,他們知道,此時此刻,他們的老師恐怕連站著都是一種抗爭,一種與生命的抗爭。
好像這只是一堂普通的政治課,是方永剛無數次授課中最普通的一堂課,依舊是鏗鏘有力的聲音,依舊是幽默風趣的語言,依舊是充滿理性的思辯,依舊是入情入理的分析,只是一條白毛巾被他頻繁地拿起又放下,手術后的引流管被他掖在了軍裝里面??
學生們震驚了,這是一個癌癥晚期的患者嗎?這是一個即將接受第三次化療的病人嗎?
兩個小時的大課結束了。任何華麗的樂章也比不過這樣一堂課更能觸動心靈,任何精彩的語言也會顯得蒼白無力,同學們用雷鳴般的掌聲和充滿敬意的目光向方老師敬禮!
什么是使命?共-產-黨員的使命是崇高的,軍人的使命是偉大的,教師的使命是神圣的,不用多說什么,不用多做什么,方永剛,一名共-產-黨員、軍人、教師,在癌癥晚期的時候往講臺上一站,就是對使命的最好詮釋。
勤勤懇懇、默默無聞”這是老黃牛的精神;“采得百花成蜜后,為誰辛苦為誰甜”這是蜜蜂的精神;“燃燒自己,照亮別人”是蠟燭的精神。可以說每種產物的存在,都有一種精神支撐著它。教師的存在呢?支撐它的就應該是這種高尚的師德吧!
報告會上,我和同事們聽得很認真,記得很仔細,不時的被方永剛的事跡感動得熱淚盈眶。走上三尺講臺,我們教書育人;走下三尺講臺,我們為人師表。師德,不是簡單的說教,而是一種精神體現,一種深厚的知識內涵和文化品味的體現。讓我們一起建設愛崗敬業、愛生如子的首醫家園,用我們的愛與責任撐起教育的藍天。像珍惜愛情一樣珍惜你的現在說起來很諷刺。當我最終定下來寫有關珍惜的講稿時,想上網搜幾個有關珍惜的名言警句,于是我打開百度網頁,再搜索欄里輸入“珍惜”,空格,“名言警句”,然后摁了回車。一個讓我有些尷尬又哭笑不得的事情發生了。我看到,在蹦出來的十個詞條里邊,有七八個在“珍惜”兩個字的后面,緊跟著的是“小學生演講稿”。看來,我打算要在大學課堂里當作重點來講的東西是人家小學生早就知道的。
是啊,對于珍惜,或許在我們很小的時候就已經知道了,甚至已經懂得了它的涵義以及如何才能做到珍惜。然而,知道就等于自己都做到了嗎?事實并非如此,所以我最終還是選擇了這個看起來似乎有些幼稚的話題,因為有時候不是大
家不知道珍惜,而往往是在擁有的時候忘記了要珍惜。我想,或許現在我們都需要被“珍惜”這兩個字來提醒。
不知道大家還記不記得這樣一則新聞:一架飛外阿拉斯加的飛機因為機械故障,造成機毀人亡,墜入了太平洋。當時看到這則新聞的時候,讓我印象最深的是報道說,在那些遇難者中,有一對要去阿拉斯加度蜜月的新婚夫婦。我幾乎可以想象得到在飛機失事前,那對新婚夫婦臉上洋溢的喜悅和甜蜜。或許他們還在規劃著飛機著陸后,將去哪里就餐,或許直接奔往早已定好的酒店入住,再或許一起欣賞向往已久的極地風光。可是人的生命是那么脆弱,他們甚至來不及好好地享受已經擁有的幸福。
那些無辜的人們一瞬間就喪失了生命,看著死難者家屬無助又痛苦的電視畫面,我的心情復雜極了。對于那對年輕的夫婦來說,不幸的,是小夫妻倆沒能來得及享受蜜月期間的快樂,而所幸的是,他們已經彼此找到了對方,并以對方為伴。最起碼他們在生命的最后一段時光中是幸福的,因為他們身邊有相愛的人陪伴,他們珍惜了自己的愛情。我甚至可以想象,在他們知道自己就要離開人世之前,浮現在他們臉上的是那早已把恐懼驅散的沒了蹤影的幸福笑容。
同學們,再想想我們吧,看到這些難道就沒有觸動?瑞士偉大的民-主主義教育家——裴斯太羅奇說過,今天的事沒有做,明天再早也是耽誤了。是啊,為什么我們要等到失去或已無法挽回的時候才追悔莫及。這一刻的我們不會知道下一刻會有怎樣的變化,甚至不知道現在擁有的一切是否突然就會溜走,所以我們必須像珍惜愛情一樣珍惜現在。
以下是英文演講稿
英文演講稿開場白
Opening Statement
mr.chairman, senator thurmond, members of the committee, my name is anita f.hill, and i am a professor of law at the university of oklahoma.i was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in 1956.i am the youngest of 13 children.i had my early education in okmulgee county.my father, albert hill, is a farmer in that area.my mother's name is irma hill.she is also a farmer and a housewife.my childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents.i was reared in a religious atmosphere in the baptist faith, and i have been a member of the antioch baptist church in tulsa, oklahoma, since 1983.it is a very warm part of my life at the present time.for my undergraduate work, i went to oklahoma state university and graduated from there in 1977.i am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.i graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the yale law school, where i received my jd degree in 1980.upon graduation from law school, i became a practicing lawyer with the washington, dc, firm of ward, hardraker, and ross.in 1981, i was introduced to now judge thomas by a mutual friend.judge thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if i would be interested in working with him.he was, in fact, appointed as assistant secretary of education for civil rights.after he had taken that post, he asked if i would become his assistant, and i accepted that position.in my early period there, i had two major projects.the first was an article i wrote for judge thomas' signature on the education of minority students.the second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that office.during this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was positive.i had a good deal of responsibility and independence.i thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment.after approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.what happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things--experiences of my life.it is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleeplenumber--a great number of sleeplenights tha(t i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.i declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working relationship.i had a normal social life with other men outside of the office.i believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised.i was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.these incidents took place in his office or mine.they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuse-x.on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.his conversations were very vivid.he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes.he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large peni
ons, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.because i was extremely uncomfortable talking about se-x with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these subjects.i would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonse-xual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs.my efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements.my reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations.this was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of education--or of
fice for civil rights.i thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions.however, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions.he pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him.these incidents took place in his office or mine.they were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.my working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to discuse-x.on these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria.after a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of se-xual matters.his conversations were very vivid.he spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having se-x with animals and films showing group se-x or rape scenes.he talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large peni
ons, thomas told me graphically of his own se-xual prowess.