第一篇：比爾蓋茨談能源(TED字幕)

I’m going to talk today about energy and climate.And that might seem a bit surprising because my full-time work at the foundation is mostly about vaccines and seeds,about the things that we need to invent and deliver to help the poorest two billion live better lives.But energy and climate are extremely important to these people,in fact,more important than anyone else on the planet.The climate getting worse means that many years that many years,their crops won’t grow.There will be too much rain,not enough rain,things will change in ways that their fragile environment simply can’t support.And that leads to starvation,it leads to uncertainty,it leads to unrest.So, the price of energy is very important to them.In fact, if you could pick just one thing to lower th-e price of, to reduce poverty, by far you would pick energy.Now ,the price of energy has become down over time.Really advanced civilization is based on advances in energy.The coal revolution fueled the Industrial Revolution, and,even in 1990s we’ve seen a very rapid decline in the price of electricity, and that’s why we have refrigerators,air-conditioning, we can make modern materials and do so many things.And so ,we’re in a wonderful situation with electricity in the rich world.But, as we make it cheaper-and let’s go for making it twice as cheap-we need to meet a new constrain,and that constrain has to do with CO2.CO2 is warning the planet, and the equation on CO2 is actually a very straightforward one.If you sum up the CO2 that gets emitted,that leads to a temperature increase, and that temperature increase leads to some very negative effects: the effects on the weather, perhaps worse, the indirect effects,in that the nature ecosystems can’t adjust to these rapid changes, and so you get ecosystem collapses.Now, the exact amount of how you map from a certain increase of CO2 to what temperature will be and where the positive feedback are, there’s some uncertainty there,but not very much.And there’s certainly uncertainty about how bad those effects will be, but they will be extremely bad.I asked the top scientists on this several times.Do we really have to get down to near zero? Can’t we just cut it in half or a quarter? And the answer is that until we get near to zero,the temperature will continue to rise.And so that’s a big challenge.It’s very different than saying “We’re a twelve-foot-high truck trying to get under a ten-foot bridge, and we can just sort of squeeze under.” This is something that has to get to zero.Now,we put out of a lot of carbon dioxide every year, over 26 billion tons.For each American, it’s about 20 tons;for people in poor countries,it’s less than one ton.It’s an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet.And, somehow, we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero.It’s been constantly going up.It’s only various economic changes that have been flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapid rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication: So, you’re got a thing on the left,CO2,that you want to get to zero,and that’s going to be based on the number of people,the services each person’s using on average,the energy on average for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.So ,let’s look at each one of these and see how we get this down to zero.Probably, one of this number is going to have to get pretty near to zero.Now that’s back from high school algebra,but let’s take a look.First, we’ve got population.The world today has 6.8 billion people.That’s headed up to about nine billion.Now ,if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by ,perhaps, 10 or 15 percent, but there we see an increase of about 1.3.The second factor is the services we use.This encompass everything: the foot we eat, clothing, TV,heating.These are very good things:getting rid of poverty means providing these services to almost everyone on the planet.And it’s a great thing for this number to go up.In the rich world,perhaps the top one billion,we probably could cut back and use less,but every year, this numer, on average,is going to go up,and so, over all,that will more than double,the services delivered per person.Here we have a very basic service: Do you have lighting in your house to be able to read your homework? And, in fact,these kids don’t,so they’re going out and reading their school work under the street lamps.Now, efficiency,E,the energy for each service,here finally we have some good news.We have something that’s not going up.Through various inventions and new ways of doing lighting through different types of car,different ways of building--there are a lot of services where you can bring the energy for that service down quite substantially.There are other services like how we make fertilizer,or how we do air transport,where the rooms for improvement are far ,far less.And so,overall here,if we’re optimistic,we may get a reduction of a factor of three to even,perhaps, a factor of six.But for these first three factors now,we’ve gone from 26billion to, at best,may 13 billion tons, and that just won’t cut it.So let’s look at this fourth factor-this is going to be a key one-and this is the amount of CO2 put out per each unit of energy.And so the question is:can you actually get that to zero? If you burn coal,no.If you burn natural gas,no.Almost every way make electricity today,except for the emerging renewables and nuclear,puts out CO2.And so,what we’re going to have to do at a global scale,is create a new system.And so,we need energy miracles.Now, when I use the term “miracle,” I don’t mean something that’s impossible.The microprocessor is a miracle.The personal computer is a miracle.The Internet and its services are miracles.So, the people here have participated in the creation of many miracles.Usually, we don’t have a deadline,where you have to get the miracle by a certain date.Usually, you just kind of stand by and some come along.This is a case where we actually have to drive at full speed and get a miracle in a pretty tight timeline.Now I thought, “how could I really capture this?Is there some kind of natural illustration,some demonstration that would grab people’s imagination here?” I thought back to a year ago when I brought mosquitos, and somehow people enjoyed that.It really got them involved in the ideal of, you know,there are people who live with mosquitos.So, with energy, all I could come up with is this.I decided that releasing fireflies would be my contribution to the environment here this year.So here we have some natural fireflies.I’m told they don’t bite, in fact,they might not even leave that jar.Now,there all sorts of gimmicky solutions like that one,but they don’t really add up to much.We need solutions-either one or several-that have unbelievable scale and unbelievable reliability, and, although there’s many directions people are seeking, I really only see five that can achieve the big numbers.I’ve left out tide, geothermal,fusion, biofuels.Those may make some contribution, and if they can do better than I expect, so much the better, but my key point here is that we’ve going to have to work on each of these five, and we can’t give up any of them because they look daunting,because they all have significant challenges.Let’s look first at the burning fossil fuels,either burning coal or burning natural gas.What you need to do there,seems like it might be simple,but it’s not, and that’s to take all the CO2, after you’ve burned it, going out the flue,pressurize it, create a liquid, put it somewhere,and hope it stays there.Now we have some pilot things that do this at the 60 to 80 percent level, but getting to that full percentage,that will be very tricky, and agreeing on where these CO2 quantities should be put will be hard, but the toughest one here is this long-term issue.Who’s going to be sure? Who’s going to guarantee something that is literally billions of time large than any type of of wasted you think of in terms of nuclear or other things? This is a lot of volume.So that’s a tough one.Next would be nuclear.It also has three big problems: Cost, particularly in highly regulated countries,is high, the issue of the the safety, really feeling good about nothing could go wrong ,that,even though you have these human operators,that the fuel doesn’t get used for weapons.And then what do you do with the waste? And ,although it’s not very large, there are a lot of concerns about that.People need to feel good about it.So three very tough problems that might be solvable,and so ,should be worked on.The last three of the five,I’ve grouped together.These are what people often refer to as the renewable.And they actually--although it’s great they don’t require fuel-they have some disadvantages.One of that the density of energy gathered in these technologies is dramatically less than a power plan.This is energy farming, so you’re talking about many square miles, thousands of time more area than you think of as a normal energy plant.Also, these are intermittent sources.The sun doesn’t shine all day,it doesn’t shine every day, and,likewise,the wind doesn’t blow all the time.And also, if you depend on these sources,you have to have some way of getting the energy during those time period that’s it’s not a available.So, we’ve got big cost challenges here,we have transmission challenges: for example,say this energy source is outside your country;you not only need the technology, but you have to deal with the risk of the energy coming from elsewhere.And finally, this storage problem.And, to dimensionalize this, I went through and looked at all types of batteries that get made--for cars, for computers, for phones, for flashlights, for everything--and compared that to the amount of electricity energy the world uses,and what found is that all the batteries we make now could store less than 10 minutes of all the energy.And so, in fact, we need a big breakthrough here, something that’s going to be a factor of 100 better than the approaches we have now.It’s not impossible, but it’s not a easy thing.Now, this shows up when you try to get the intermittent source to be above,say, 20 to 30 percent of what you’re using.If you’re counting on it for 100 percent,you need a miracle battery.Now, how we’re going to go forward on this--what’s the right approach? Is it a Manhattan Project? What’s the thing that can get using.What’s the thing that can get us there? Well, we need lots of companies working on this,hundreds.In each of these five paths, we need at less a hundred people.And a lot of them,you’ll look at and say, “they’re crazy”.That’s good.And, I think, here in the TED group.We have many people who are already pursuing this.Bill Gross has several companies, including one called eSolar that has some great solar thermal technologies.Vinod Khosla’s investing in dozens of companies that are doing great things and have interesting possibilities, and I’m trying to help back that.Nathan Myhrvold and I actually are backing a company that, perhaps surprisingly,is actually taking the nuclear approach.There are some innovation in nuclear: modular, liquid.And innovation really stopped in this industry quite some ago, so the idea that there’s some good ideas laying around is not all that surprising.The idea of TerraPower is that, instead of burning a part of uranium-the one percent, which is the U235-we decided, “Let’s burn the 99 percent, the U238.” It’s kind of crazy idea.In fact,people had talked about it for a long time, but they could never simulate properly whether it would work or not, and so it’s through the advent of modern supercomputers that now you can simulate and see that, yes, with the right material’s approach, this looks like it would work.And, because you’re burning that 99 percent you have greatly improved cost profile.You actually burn up the waste, and you can actually use as fuel all the leftover waste from today’s reactors.So, instead of worrying about them, you just take that.It’s a great thing.It breathes this uranium as it goes along, so it’s kind of like a candle.You can see it’s a log here, often referred to as a traveling wave reactor.In terms of fuel, this really solves the problem.I’ve got a picture here of a place in Kentucky.This is the leftover, the 99 percent, where they’ve taken out the part they burn now, so it’s called depleted uranium.That would power the U.S for hundreds of years.And, simply by filtering seawater in an inexpensive process, you’d have enough fuel for the entire lifetime of the rest of the planet.So, you know, it’s got lot’s of challenges ahead,but it is an example of the many hundreds and hundreds of ideas that we need to move forward.So let’s think:How should we measure ourselves? What should our report card look like? Well, let’s go out to where we really need to get, and then look at the intermediate.For 2050, you’ve heard many people talk about this 80 percent reduction.That really is very important,that we get there.And that 20 percent will be used up by things going on in poor countries, still some agriculture, hopefully we will have cleaned up forestry, cement.So, to get that percent, the developed countries, including countries like China, will have had to switch their electricity generation altogether.So, the other grade is: Are we deploying this zero-emission technology, have we deployed in all the developed countries and we’re in the process of getting it elsewhere? That’s super important.That’s a key element of making the report card.So, backing up from there,what should the 2020 report card look like? Well, again, it should go through these efficiency measures to start getting reductions.The less we emit, the less that sum will be of CO2, and, therefore, the less the temperature.But in some ways, the grade we get there,doing things that don’t get us all the way to the big reductions,is only equally, or maybe even slightly less,important than the other, which is the piece of innovation on these breakthroughs.These breakthroughs, we need to move those at full speed, and we can measure that in terms of companies, pilot projects, regulatory things that have been changed.There’s a lot of great books that have been written about this.The Al Gore, “our choice” and the David Mckay book, “Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air.” They really go through it and created a framework that this can be discussed broadly,because we need broad backing for this.There’s a lot that has to come together.So this is a wish.It’s a very concrete wish that we invent this technology.If you gave me only one wish for the next 50 years-I can pick who’s president, I can keep a vaccine, which is something I love, or I could pick that this thing that’s half the cost with no CO2 gets invented-this is the wish I would pick.This is the one with the greatest impact.If we don’t get this wish, the division between the people who think short term and long term will be terrible, between the U.S.and China ,between poor countries and rich, and most of all the lives of those two billion will far worse.So, what do we have to do ? What am I appealing you to step forward and drive? We need to go for more research funding.When countries get together in places like Copenhagen, they shouldn’t just discuss the CO2.They should discuss this innovation agenda, and you’d be stunned at the ridiculously low level of spending on these innovation approaches.We do need the market incentives-CO2 tax,cap and trade something that gets that price signal out there.We need to get the massage out.We need to have this dialogue to be a more rational, more understandable dialogue, including the steps that the government takes.This is an important wish, but it is one think we can achieve.Thank you!

第二篇：比爾蓋茨夫婦 TED演講稿（最終版）

Melinda Gates: This is in Africa, our very first trip, the first time either of us had ever been to Africa, in the fall of 1993.We were already engaged to be married.We married a few months later, and this was the trip where we really went to see the animals and to see the savanna.It was incredible.Bill had never taken that much time off from work.But what really touched us, actually, were the people, and the extreme poverty.We started asking ourselves questions.Does it have to be like this? 梅琳達·蓋茨：這是我們第一次旅行，在非洲拍的。我們倆都是第一次去非洲，那是1993年的秋天，我們已經訂婚。幾月后，我們結婚了，我們想通過這次旅行看看野生動物和熱帶草原。真是太美了。比爾和我從來沒有放過這么長的假。但是真正讓我們深受觸動的是那兒的人，那兒的貧窮。我們開始捫心自問，一切只能是這樣嗎？ Bill Gates: Well, we decided that we'd pick two causes, whatever the biggest inequity was globally, and there we looked at children dying, children not having enough nutrition to ever develop, and countries that were really stuck, because with that level of death, and parents would have so many kids that they'd get huge population growth, and that the kids were so sick that they really couldn't be educated and lift themselves up.So that was our global thing, and then in the U.S., both of us have had amazing educations, and we saw that as the way that the U.S.could live up to its promise of equal opportunity is by having a phenomenal education system, and the more we learned, the more we realized we're not really fulfilling that promise.比爾·蓋茨：我們決定選擇兩個方面：任何世界上最不公平的事，這指的是垂死的兒童，營養跟不上的兒童，因為高死亡率發展停滯不前的國家，國家人口劇長，孩子病得太重，他們沒法受教育養活自己。這是世界的情況，而在美國，我們夫妻倆都受過良好的教育，我們看到美國實現“機會平等”這一承諾的途徑就是其良好的教育體系。我們了解的越多，就越深刻地意識到我們并沒有完全兌現我們的承諾。So this is a story largely of vaccines.Smallpox was killing a couple million kids a year.That was eradicated, so that got down to zero.Measles was killing a couple million a year.That's down to a few hundred thousand.Anyway, this is a chart where you want to get that number to continue, and it's going to be possible, using the science of new vaccines, getting the vaccines out to kids.We can actually accelerate the progress.所以這個故事主要說的是疫苗。以前，每年有幾百萬的兒童死于天花。現在我們擺脫它了，死亡數變成了零。每年有百萬人死于麻疹，現在這個數字是幾十萬。總之，在這張圖表中，如果你讓數字繼續下去，就有可能利用新疫苗技術為兒童提供疫苗。我們可以加快這個進程。Because we built this thing together from the beginning, it's this great partnership.I had that with Paul Allen in the early days of Microsoft.I had it with Steve Ballmer as Microsoft got bigger, and now Melinda, and in even stronger, equal ways, is the partner, so we talk a lot about which things should we give more to, which groups are working well? She's got a lot of insight.She'll sit down with the employees a lot.We'll take the different trips she described.So there's a lot of collaboration.I can't think of anything where one of us had a super strong opinion about one thing or another? 因為我們從零開始建立了它，這是一種絕妙的伙伴關系。微軟早期，我曾和保羅·艾倫有那種伙伴關系。微軟的成長期我有史蒂夫·巴摩，現在微軟更強了，梅琳達以一種更穩固，更平等的方式成為了我的伙伴。我們談論了很多，哪些事情更應該重視，哪一個團隊運作的很好？她有很多深刻見解。她能和員工打成一片。我們各自出行，就像她說的，我們也有很多合作。我想不出有哪件事一方的主張特別強烈。Well, I would say a huge lesson for us out of the early work is we thought that these small schools were the answer, and small schools definitely help.They bring down the dropout rate.They have less violence and crime in those schools.But the thing that we learned from that work, and what turned out to be the fundamental key, is a great teacher in front of the classroom.If you don't have an effective teacher in the front of the classroom, I don't care how big or small the building is, you're not going to change the trajectory of whether that student will be ready for college.我想說的是一個深刻的教訓，工作早期，我們以為小規模的學校就是解決辦法，當然小規模學校有一定作用，可以減少輟學率。學校內的暴力事件和犯罪比較低。但是我們從工作中學到的，也是最重要的一件事就是課堂上必須有個好老師。如果沒有有效率的老師，無論教室大或小，你都不可能改變學生是否已經準備好上大學的軌跡。

第三篇：TED演講——不要固執于英語英文字幕

不要固執于英語

I know what you’re thinking.You think I’ve lost my way, and somebody’s going to come on the stage in a minute and guide me gently back to my seat.I get that all thetimein Dubai.“Here on holiday are you, dear?”“Come to visit the children?”“How long are you staying?”Well actually, I hope for a while longer yet.I have been living and teaching in Gulf for over 30 years.And in that time, I have seen a lot of changes.Now that statistic is quit shocking.And I want to talk to you today about language loss and the globalization of English.I want to tell you about my friend who was teacher English to adults in Abu Dhabi.And one fine day, she decided to take them into the garden to teach them some nature vocabulary.But it was she who ended up learning all the Arabic words for the local plants, as well as their uses, medicinal uses, cosmetics, cooking, herbal.How did those students get all that knowledge? Of course, from their grandparentsand even their great-grandparents.It’s not necessary to tell you how important it is to be able to communicate across generation.But sadly, today, languages are dying at an unprecedented rate.A language dies every 14 days.Now at the same time, English is the undisputed global language.Could there be a connection? We don’t know.But I do knowthat I’ve seen a lot of changes.When I first came out to the Gulf, I came to Kuwait in the days it was still a hardship post.Actually, not that long ago.That is a little bit too early.But nevertheless, I was recruited by the British Council along with about 25 other teachers.And we were the first non-Muslims to teach in the state schools there in Kuwait.We were brought to teach English because the government wanted to modernize the country and empower the citizens through education.And of course, the U.K.benefited from some of that lovely oil wealth.Okay.Now this is the major change that I’ve seen how teaching English has morphed from being a mutually beneficial practice to becoming a massive international business that it is today.No longer just a foreign language on the school curriculum.And no longer the sole domain of mother England.It has become a bandwagon for every English-speaking nation on earth.And why not? After all, the best education according to the latest World University Rankings is to be found in the universities of the U.K.and the U.S.So everybody wants to have an English education, naturally.But if you’re not a native speaker, you have to pass a test.Now can it be right to reject a student on linguistic ability alone? Perhaps you have a computer scientist who’s a

genius.Would he need the same language as a lawyer, for example? Well, I don’t think so.We English teachers reject them all the time.We put a stop sign, and we stop them in their tracks.They can’t pursue their dream any longer, till they get English.Now let me put it this way, if I met a monolingual Dutch speakerwho had the cure for cancer, would I stop him from entering my British University? I don’t think so.But indeed, that is exactly what we do.We English teachers are the gatekeepers.And you have to satisfy us first that your English is good enough.Now it can be dangerous to give too much power, to a narrow segment of society.Maybe the barrier would be too university.Okay.“But,” I hear you say, “What about the research? It’s all in English.” So the books are in English, the journals are done in English, but that is self-fulfilling prophecy.It deeds the English requirement.And so it goes on.I ask you, what happened to translation? If you think about the Islamic Golden Age, there was lots of translation then.They translate from Latin and Greek into Arabic, into Persian, and then it was translated on into the Germanic languages of Europe and the Romance languages.And so light shone upon the Dark Ages of Europe.Now don’t get me wrong.I am not against teaching English, all you English teachers out there.I love thatwe have a global language.We need one today more than ever.But I am against using it as a barrier.Do we really want to end up with 600 languages and the main one being English and Chinese? We need more than that.Where do we draw the line? This system equates intelligence with a knowledge of English which is quite arbitrary.And I want to remind you that the giant upon whose shoulders today’s intelligentsia stand did not have to have English, they didn’t have to pass an English test.Case in point, Einstein.He, by the way, was considered remedial at school because he was, in fact, dyslexic.But fortunately for the world, he did not have to pass an English test.Because they didn’t start until 1964 with TOEFL, the AmericanTest of English.Now it’s exploded.There are lots and lots of tests of English.And millions and millions of students take these tests every year.Now you might think, you and me, those fees aren’t bad, they’re okay, but they are prohibitive to so many millions of poor people.So immediately, we’re rejecting them.It brings to mind a headline I saw recently: “Education: The Great Divide.” Now I get it, I understand why people would focus on English.They want to give their children the best chance in the life.And to do that, they need a Western education.Because, of course, the best jobs go to people out of the Western Universities, that I put on earlier.It’s a circular thing.Okay.Let me tell you a story about two scientists, two English scientists.They were doing an experiment to do with genetics and the forelimbs and the hind limbs of animals.But they couldn’t get the results they wanted.They really didn’t know what to do, until along came a German scientist who realized that they were using two words for forelimb and hind limb, whereas genetics does not differentiate and neither does German.So bingo, problem solved.If you can’t think a thought, you are stuck.But if another language can think that thought, then, by cooperating, we can achieve and learn so much more.My daughter, came to England from Kuwait.She had studied science and mathematics in Arabic.It’s an Arabic medium school.She had to translate it into English at her grammar school.And she was the best in the class at those subjects.Which tells us, that when students come to us from abroad, we may not be giving them enough credit for what they know.And they know it in their own language.When a language dies, we don’t know what we lose with that language.This is –I don’t know if you saw it on CNN recently—they give the Heroes Award to a young Kenyan shepherd boy who couldn’t study at night in his village like all the village children, because the Kerosene lamp, it had smoke and it damaged his eyes.And anyway, there was never enough kerosene, because what does a dollar a day buy for you? So he invented a cost-free solar lamp.And now the children in his village get the same grades at school as the children who have electricity at home.When he received his award, he said these lovely words: The children can lead Africa from a dark continent, to a light continent.A simple idea, but it could have such fat-reaching consequences.Peoplewho have no light, whether it’s physical or metaphorical, cannot pass our exam, and we can never know what they know.Let us not keep them and ourselves in the dark.Let us celebrate diversity.Mind your language.Use it to spread great ideas.

第四篇：最酷的TED名人精英演講集錦(中英字幕)(持續更新……)

最酷的TED名人精英演講集錦（中英字幕）（持續更新??）

ED是一個會議的名稱，它是英文technology, entertainment, design三個單詞的首字母縮寫。TED是社會各界精英交流的盛會，它鼓勵各種創新思想的展示、碰撞。TED創始于1984年，現在由Chris Anderson創立的非營利機構種子基金會主辦。

大會邀請世界上的思想領袖與實干家來分享他們最熱衷從事的事業，美國前總統比爾·克林頓、世界首富比爾·蓋茨、維珍品牌創始人理查德·布蘭森、國際設計大師菲利普·斯達克以及U2樂隊主唱Bono 都曾經擔任過演講嘉賓。參加者們稱贊它為“ 超級大腦SPA”和“未來四日游。2001 年，克里斯·安德森創立的種子基金會幾經周折，從溫曼手中買下TED。“我記得杰夫·貝索斯(注：亞馬遜創始人)跟我說過，‘TED 大會是一個非常了不起的聚會，你要把它搞糟了都不是很容易的事。’所以我給自己一個稱號：‘TED 大會的守護人’。”在安德森的看護下，TED 成長為一個超越會議性質的世界品牌。

本頁面視頻為專輯示范視頻，本專輯更多視頻演講請點擊視頻下面的節目列表觀看。將此教程分享到：2分類綜合資料標簽: 設計, 技術, 娛樂, TED, TED演講, TED中文字幕收藏此教程 同專題視頻TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--11歲小學生談論自己如何為iOS開發軟件TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--Aimee.Mullins和她的十二雙腿TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--一個廣告人的領悟TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--一種更寬容、更溫和的成功哲學TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--下定的目標可別告訴別人（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--世界英語熱TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--為什么世界需要維基泄密網TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--為什么我們會快樂和不快樂TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--為什么要儲存數以十億計的種子TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--了解中國的崛起TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--人們為什么會喜歡買彩票？TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--人類想象力圖書館TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--人際關系的潛在影響（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--偉大創新的誕生TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--偉大的領袖如何激勵行動（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--傳奇大師的魔術催眠秀TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--你現在和豬一起生活著TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--保持聽力的八個步驟TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--傾聽twitter用戶的心聲TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--做生活的高手TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--做生活的高手（下）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--健康取決于你居住的地方TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--關于最近氣候變化的警告TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--關于維基百科誕生的演講TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--內向的力量TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--凈水裝置救生瓶TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--劉若瑀：行腳、修行、自我覺醒TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--包益民:重新定義設計師TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--四軸機器人編隊、合作、彈奏、三維建模TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--大度人生之啟發TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--大腦如何學會看TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--天才少女小提琴家技精TED大會TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--天才鸚鵡逗樂無極限TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--如人類一般不理性的猴子經濟TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--如何解讀別人的心思TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--對抗貪污的新方法TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--對最新氣候的趨勢發出的警告TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--將OLPC帶到哥倫比亞TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--工作萬歲 不分貴賤TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--希勒爾庫伯曼談成年人的樂高TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--建設綠色環保的未來TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--性高潮的秘密TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--成功是趟持續的旅程TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--成年人能從孩子那里學到什么（鄒奇奇）（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--我們為什么快樂（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--我得到過的最好禮物（讓你感動）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--改變世界的照片（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--放風箏迎來新凈能源時代TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--教育扼殺創意TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--數學課程必須改頭換面TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--未來不再遙遠TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--未來網絡5000天TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--本世紀最大的不公平TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--楊瀾:中國的新一代TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--每顆花粉都有一個故事TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--比爾蓋茨TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--泡妞妙招:找個更丑的同伴陪你（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--活出人生的極致（斯蒂芬喬布斯）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--混沌與和諧之音TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--愛就像上膛的手槍TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--犯錯的價值TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--用視頻與不公平斗爭TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--電影級數字化頭像的秘密TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--當腦中的概念交配起來TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--癌癥戰爭新政策TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--看美**親怎樣回答孩子是怎樣來到這個世界上的？（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--示范無線電力傳輸TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--究竟Youtube 如何看待影音版權問題TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--穿著翼裝滑翔TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--第六感官技術的驚異潛力TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--第六感裝置演示TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--給你一個更健康的時間觀TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--網游改變世界TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--致男人的宣言TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--艾滋病毒與流感TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--艾瑟_本德演示人類外骨骼TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--英國首相卡梅倫:談下一代的政府TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--解恒益智游戲之美TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--許芳宜:不怕和世界不一樣TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--讓人快樂的好設計TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--記憶與經驗的爭斗之謎TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--談簡單生活TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--談跑步TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--資深外教:不要執意要求英語TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--走向簡單的本質TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--轉變心態的珠峰旅游TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--選擇的藝術（推薦）TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--選擇越多 困惑越多TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--避免氣候危機TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--阿凡達之前一個好奇的男孩TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--阿拉伯世界流行文化TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--陶喆: 放下才能獲得更多TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--霍金 我們的宇宙如何開始TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--頂尖設計師與你講述人生TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）--顛覆爵士樂TED名人演講集錦（中英字幕）（持續更新??）

第五篇：談我國能源相關企業的企業文化

談我國能源相關企業的企業文化

U201211540熱動1208閆曉龍

摘要：能源作為人類社會發展的三大支柱之一，對人類生活有至關重要的影響。能源行業特殊的地位決定著與能源相關企業獨特的企業文化：追求節能減排高效收益目標，貫行企業能源管理，培養獨具特色的“能”精神。

關鍵字：能源，企業，能源管理，“能”文化

在討論能源相關企業的文化之前，先要認清中國能源現狀。一是能源以煤炭為主，可再生資源開發利用程度很低。二是能源消費總量不斷增長，能源利用效率較低。三是能源消費以國內供應為主，環境污染狀況加劇，優質能源供應不足。鑒于中國特殊的國情，能源相關企業勢必有特殊的，與其他類型企業相異的企業文化。

首先，絕大多數能源相關企業都是國有企業。這是企業的基本性質，這是由能源在國民經濟，國家安全的特殊地位所決定的。此外，我國企業能源壟斷幾乎壟斷了市場能源資源，這與能源行業的豐厚利益是分不開的。當然，現在社會上對這樣的能源結構的反對聲音越來越大。

不可否認，我國能源國有企業中確實存在一些消極因素，但我們也應該看到，各企業之間確確實實存在的激烈競爭。能源企業中存在特別的管理理念——企業能源管理。什么是企業能源管理？1.合理組織生產：提高勞動生產效率，提高產品產量和質量，減少殘次品率，利用電網低谷組織生產，均衡生產，減少機器空轉，各種用能設備是

否處在最佳經濟運行狀態，排查生產管理方面的“跑冒滴漏”，提高生產現場的組織管理水平，減少各種直接和間接能耗、物耗損失等。?2.合理分配能源：不同品種、質量的能源應合理分配使用，減少庫存積壓和能源、物資的超量儲備，提高能源和原材料的利用效率。?3.加強能源購進管理：提高運輸質量，減少裝運損耗和虧噸，強化計量和傳遞驗收手續、提高理化檢驗水平，按規定合理扣水扣雜等。?4.加強項目的節能管理：新上和在建、已建項目是不是做了“節能篇”論證，核算其經濟效果、環境效果和節能效益是否達標。?5.規章制度落實情況：企業能源管理各種規章制度是否健全合理，是否落實到位，如能源、物資的招標采購竟價制度，對質量、計量、定價、驗收、入庫、票據、成本核算是否嚴格把關，要認真細致地排查、分析、診斷問題。一般企業在管理方面存在的問題比較多，漏洞多，浪費大，管理節能是不花錢的節能，只要加強管理，嚴格制度，就能見效。

下面我就以中石化為例，走進中國能源企業文化中。

一、企業宗旨

中國石化以“發展企業、貢獻國家、回報股東、服務社會、造福員工”作為企業宗旨。

發展企業——始終把發展作為第一要務，不斷做強做大主業、提高發展質量和效益，努力增強國際競爭力，實現永續發展。

貢獻國家——牢記國有骨干企業的責任和使命，不斷加快發展、創造財富，努力為維護國家能源安全、增強綜合國力做貢獻。

回報股東——致力于資產保值增值，以良好的業績回報股東，努力保障股東穩定而長期的利益。

服務社會——致力于以安全、清潔的方式提供產品和服務，積極參與社會公益事業，服務社會發展。

造福員工——堅持以人為本，維護員工合法權益，積極為員工的全面發展創造條件，共享企業發展成果，實現員工同企業共同發展。

上述五個方面的有機統一，體現了國家、股東、企業與員工利益相協調，當前與長遠發展相協調，企業與社會、環境相協調，是集團公司生存發展的意義所在和自覺追求。

二、企業愿景

中國石化以“建設具有較強國際競爭力的跨國能源化工公司”作為企業愿景。通過不懈努力，使公司的產業結構、資產結構更加合理，主業經營規模、盈利能力、創新能力明顯提升，國際化程度明顯提高，人才隊伍結構合理、素質優良，企業凝聚力、競爭力明顯增強，躋身世界能源化工公司前列。

三、企業精神

中國石化傳承、豐富和弘揚“愛我中華、振興石化”的企業精神。以“愛我中華、振興石化”為精神支柱、力量源泉，顧全大局，勇擔重任，愛崗敬業，奮發圖強，努力創造一流的業績和水平，不斷發展和振興中國石化的能源之業、石化之業、跨國之業。

四、企業作風

中國石化繼承和發揚“精細嚴謹、務實創新”的優良作風。

精細嚴謹——以嚴格的要求和一絲不茍的態度，追求生產上精耕細作、經營上精打細算、管理上精雕細刻、技術上精益求精，努力提升經營管理水平。

務實創新——始終當老實人、說老實話、辦老實事，腳踏實地，艱苦奮斗，務科學之實、發展之實、作風之實，與時俱進，勇于創新，敢于超越，努力創造卓越業績。

五、經營理念

中國石化以“誠信規范、合作共贏”作為企業經營理念。

誠信規范——以信用立企、制度治企作為企業的立身之本和發展之基，堅持以誠相待、重信守諾，認真負責、規范運作，做到言必行、行必果，有法必依、有章必循。

合作共贏——以開放、合作作為持續發展的必由之路，堅持互相尊重、包容并蓄，取長補短、精誠合作，遵循和尊重業務所在國（地區）法律法規、文化習俗，汲取、融匯合作方的優秀文化和先進經驗，做到企業與利益相關方合作發展、互利共贏。在遵循集團公司核心價值理念統一性的基礎上，各單位可結合實際培育具有自身特點的經營管理等理念，更好地發揮企業文化的引導、凝聚和激勵作用。

除了中石化，冀中能源也值得我們去了解。冀中能源的企業文化：企業愿景：建設具有國際競爭力的大型企業集團

企業使命：奉獻優質產品創造幸福生活

企業戰略：一體兩翼多元發展

企業目標：挺進世界500強

企業核心價值觀：不斷創造歷史

企業精神：敢為人先奮發圖強

企業作風：雷厲風行執行到位

企業安全理念：生命高于一切

企業人才理念：干好本職就是人才

“能”文化

愛維龍媒根據中國傳統文化及內蒙電業的優良傳統，借鑒現代管理思想與國內外優秀企業文化，結合內蒙古能源發電投資有限公司組建的歷史背景和成長歷程，總結、提煉出“能文化”。“能文化”是源于“能源、能量、能力”的能本管理理念和“沒有如果，只有我能，釋放能量，抒發豪情”的企業精神的概括和總結。能文化增補了以能力為導向的國內企業文化空白，倍受業內知名人士推崇。“能文化”是最能突出表現整個能源企業的整體文化。“能”是月亮之上的平臺，要想實現心中的夢想，只有站得高，才能看得遠，就要為自己插上騰飛的雙翼。能源發電內涵著“能源、能量、能力”的企業文化，體現了“天時、地利、人和”的哲學思想，表達了能源企業搶抓機遇、發揮優勢、成就事業的決心。能文化的內涵：能源發電人是這樣認識的。標識以“能”字和“龍”字構成象形圖案，形似能、神似龍、意能成。形似能，又似電，寓意公司核心業務；神似龍，寓意行業龍頭地位及吉祥如意、向上騰飛之意；意能成，寓意公司“能”字當頭，定能成功；標志造型內方外圓，符合中國傳統“智欲圓而行必方”的古訓；標志整體構圖對稱和諧，寓意企業穩健發展，四通八達；標志整體恢弘厚重，全面彰顯公司強大的凝聚力、厚重的文化底蘊、輝煌的發展前景。

結語：我國能源企業存在著激烈的競爭，身為華科能源人，心系能源，心憂天下是我們的責任。希望在通過自己的努力，為中國的能源事業增添一份光彩。