第一篇：雅思作文

（50min，完全未經推敲的版本……正在寫一個嘗試用套句和更精確的單詞的版本……）

As we all know, the number of adolescent students who start to work before their graduation is expending in a few countries.Some opponents existed because people usually believe that the only duty of student is always study.However, the other people, including me myself, hold a contrast opinion.The first reason comes to my mind is that is that to some extent, working is not the enemy of academic, but can even help with studying sometimes.There is an old Chinese saying that ‘Practice is the best way of learning’.And I’m saying that ‘Work is the best way of practice.’ Take Wang Han for example, he used to take a part-time job as a assistant in a TV show when still being an undergraduate majored in acting, which really helped him adapt to performance after he got his first hosting job.In a word, students are able to get good experience from jobs to their future career.The other advantage is that teen students in a financial challenged family can earn part of the fees by working, which would really release the stress of their parents.Just imagine the poor Chinese young students living in the mountains of south-western China.How can they afford the educational fees without the salary of their extra working in a factory or a farm? We should not deny that having a job is better when the teenage student is in a economical trouble.Then again, I’m not encouraging the ‘children workers’ as it’s illegal in most of the countries, but I do agree that it is a good idea to find a job as a teenage student if you’re willing to practise the knowledge from books and make some money by yourself.I believe its benefits are more than the disadvantages.

第二篇：雅思作文

雅思大作文——關于電視的利弊國課班 張穎杰romy

Television as an indispensable household electrical appliances which make human beings far-reaching effects in our daily life.Nowadays,both positive aspects and negative aspects in television become more and more popular topic.Different people hold different views on it.Some people insist that the television act as an important role in all of the medium,it is a best way to broaden people’s horizon.Others argue that lots of people addict to the televison and forget do nothing.For my part, I take the former side for the following reasons.Firstly,television can enrich our daily life.Its one of the important mode of the civilian entertainment.Television also offer people a various of performs and programmes which can release person mentality and physical effective,as well as active human beings’s thought.people can watch television in anywhere if they could.As for them,television possess magic powder to impulse them in front of it.Especially in cleck ,they will become a brand new person who ownfull of energic to get down to work after watching television.Secondly,televison is an educational tool that the person who thisty seek an efficiently method in learing.The learner don’t need to attending a lecture or go to school ,they can study a curriculum by watching

television.This way may save learner a large amount of money andtheir precious time.So the television is the best way to choose.Last but not least,televison is an offer a good platform to make human beings acquaint themselves with the whole world directly.Television give the lalest news to the person who concerned about the issues around the global from different angles.These angle including current hot spots ,the critical artcles and ground report in each country.As the old saying goes,television make our earth more and more smaller than before.From mentioned above, there are obviously more positive aspects of television than negative aspects.Television bring more benefits in mainly three aspects as following: an pathway of entertainment,an educational tool to learner and a good platform which make people know the world.Television make person’s life become more and more colourful than few years ago.

第三篇：雅思作文

Should countries undertake space research?

Recently, there is a growing tendency that more and more countries give priority to space research, such as exploring the universe with space shuttle, satellite and space station.As far as I am concerned, this trend may bring both advantages and disadvantages.First of all, it is universally acknowledged that aerospace technology promotes the pace of space research.In addition, the development of aerospace technology makes contribution to the progress of fundamental science fields, for instance, materials engineering, nuclear physics, engineering mechanics and so forth.As a consequence, the modern industry will gradually improve, which is beneficial to the whole society.What is more, doing space research such as exploring new planets, universe space analysis and observing the black holes, will give us a opportunity to get knowledge of more information about the universe.The moment found we a new planet which is similar with the earth, maybe we would solve the problems about inadequate resouces.However, space research also has some unfavorable effects.So large is the cost in that researching which is invested by the government that the budgeting in other aspects, education and public welfare for instance, will be decreased relatively.Provided these money were spent into public welfare, the life standard of people would more or less increase.Further more, to explore the universe, we need to send a variety of

satellites and space shuttles constantly.And yet, all those machines have certain working lives.Consequently, they will fall into the seas or float in the outer pace after they finish their missions, which leads to sea and outer space pollution.In conclusion, we should think about both the merits and the demerits of space research and make this technology been applied correctly and reasonably.Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people.We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love.We also often see pictures of them in private situations.Is it appropriate for a magazine or newspaper to give this kind of private information about people?

Nowadays, there are a increasing number of celebrities in all walk of life.They are the top runners in their specialized fields and most of them own outstanding characters and personalities.And thus, the mass media give priority on all their details of life.Some paparazzi follow the famous people and take photos in special ways to yield the curiosity of the public.Personally, I would state my objection to this issue after analyzing the following three reasons.First of all, everyone owns the right to enjoy their spare time and private time even if they are famous people.After finishing their work, they could spend their time with their family and friends, go shopping, travel and do sports for instance.People need private space to deal with personal stuffs which do not want to be disturbed.So numerous are contributes the celebrities have made to our society that they deserve to be respected but not try to expose their details of personal lives.What is more, the growing curiosity to privacies of famous people leads to a phenomenon that a new kind of journalist which is named Paparazzi comes into being.All those people need to do is track the celebrities stealthily using whatever ways.As far as I am concerned, they lose the main spirit of a journalist that is to report the event and significant things to public.To some extent, they infringe the privacy right of famous people, which can not be acceptable.In conclusion, I maintain that it is not appropriate for a magazine or newspaper to report the private information of celebrities.We fans should support them via normal ways.Unlike other countries the police in the UK do not carry guns.Some think this leaves citizens unprotected, while others consider it reduces the overall level of violence in society.Give reasons for both sides of argument and state your own opinion.Recently, it becomes a controversial issue that whether or not the police in the UK should carry guns.Some people assert that the police could protect the residents better with taking guns.Nevertheless, others hold the view that it may avoid the violence accidents without bringing guns, to some extent.Generally speaking, I prefer to the former side.On one hand, despite of the fact that the crime rate is on the decrease these years, it does not mean entire disappearance of crimes.The police should take the responsibility to deal with them, such as murder, rape and robbery cases.Provided they had guns on hand, it could be relatively successful to arrest the criminals.For instance, if the criminal takes a hostage and he is extremely aggressive, the sniper who takes a special gun within a certain distance could shoot him to death.So that the police are able to protect the citizens effectively.On the other hand, some people insist that carrying no guns contributes to the decrease of violence in society.For one thing, when criminals see the policeman putting a gun to them, they may become desperate and out

of mind, and even do anything without considering the result, which may result in unexpected innocent hurts.This would not happen if policeman does not carry a gun.For another, no one can guarantee that a policeman does not shoot the passerby by mistake when he is hurriedly chasing a criminal.As far as I am concerned, in the condition of no abuse or misuse of guns, policeman should be well trained and carry guns so that they could do their best to protect the residents efficiently and successfully.Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime.Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Recently, it becomes a controversial issue that whether or not the uniform punishments should be applied for every sort of crime.Some people insist that it is wise to fulfill this policy, whereas others maintain that considering the circumstance of a certain crime and its motivation before making a decision of punishment is more reasonable.As far as I

am concerned, I am inclined to be on the side of the latter one.For one thing, the initiating and surroundings of a crime, which have a variety of types, usually lead to different levels of crimes.And thus taking each factor into consideration is necessary and helpful to establish and ensure justice and equity.Provided that we treated every crime with the same punishment, there would be a large of number of innocent people involved.For instance, if a hobo steals bread in a shopping center due to hunger, it would be sorrowful that he is forced into serious punishment.For another, if we handle individual crime with considering each aspect, it is significant to establish complete relative laws and regulations, which has rules and example cases we can obey, so that each crime could be treated fairly and equitably.In addition, our society will be beneficial from that and will make a progress steadily.Nevertheless, to some extent, fixed punishments may also have positive effects on the security of the society.For example, if individuals get knowledge of that they will receive a certain severe punishment, they may think over before they commit a crime, which maybe contributes to decrease the crime rate.In conclusion, fixed punishments own some merits indeed, while it is fairly more appreciate to give criminals the punishments they deserve with taking every factor into account and obeying the laws and regulations.

第四篇：雅思作文

Money

They say that money makes the world go around,and this is very true.People need money for almost everything today.It would be quiet difficult to life without money,but there are some who can do it.When it comes to money,hard work,lick and setting goals are important points.First,hard work is important,also necessary.Hard work is very easy,because many people lose their energy on half way.But you see,you can succeed just like anyone else.Just keep wanting it enough and to keep working for it enough.So why not decide it today to start going the extra mile on the road to your success.Once you success,you will get many money.But just have work maybe not enough,you also need luck.Luck is hard to say,when she came,you could touch her,you will get many money.Such as Bill Gates,in his time,computer just start,and many people think computer is very useless,but he catch the chance,he belive computer is great.Now,he have many money.He luck is such a bright people live in that time.But just have luck also not enough,you also need luck.Setting goals is most important.You must have a goal,and you will fight for that.If you do not have a goal,hard work just cost your energy,not develop you.And it not just for earn money,you do anything you should setting goals.Hard work,luck and setting goals are important point when it comes to money.

第五篇：雅思作文

It is right that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members, but they should pay all the cost.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary society, highly education is advancing at an alarming rate.A sizable percentage of the people hold the opinion that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members, but they should pay all the cost.Personally, I think that one’s earning cannot be solely determined by his or her educational background even though they should pay all the cost.The reasons are as follows.Firstly, having a high salary not rely on have the diploma, but how much individuals has contributed to the company or the society.Those who have a great contribution to the company or the society reward to be paid much more than those have not.For example, there are some people who have admirable capabilities have not had the opportunity to receive higher education.Then, after years of exertions and hard struggle, they have made great contributions to the society and finally realized their own self-value.Such people have not received college education.However, they deserve what they have earned.To those people, a higher salary should be paid, even more than some university graduates sometimes.Secondly, about the cost, I am convinced that university students should support themselves for the full tuition.The main reason is that it can ensure the quality of college education.College education needs many well-paid professors and various advanced facilities.In other words, it needs a great sum of money.If the college students do not pay the tuition fee, it will lay a heavy burden on the government.If the government is unable to invest enough money on university education because of the limited budget, the quality of education cannot be ensured.In addition, it might also be noted that it is quite fair to require students to pay the full tuition because going to college is a totally personal choice.Therefore it is not unreasonable for the students to pay for it.All in all, it is ridiculous to say that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members.We should pay more attention to what kind of effort and contribution a person has made.Besides, it is reasonable to let the college students pay for the cost.