第一篇：國王的演講英文影評

Rarely do you get to see a movie that promises a lot and then, lives up to it's promise.The King's Speech is a rare piece, indeed.The movie starts off with a stammering speech and signs off with a staggering one, with hardly any glitches in between.The basic premise of the movie is fairly simple.A king with a stutter is helped by a maverick speech therapist to overcome his problem and become an inspiring orator.That sounds like a very known territory to most movie goers.But few minutes into the movie, and you realize that this one simply pushes the bar a notch higher.It is a very pleasing movie, doesn't lead the audience into a lot of uncomfortable questions.However, the artistry lies in the overall balance of the movie.You slowly start getting gripped by David Seidler's screenplay.The actors are superb, takes it slow and steady with superb grip on each of their characters.While Colin Firth puts in a spectacular performance(one you can't miss), Geoffrey Rush goes a bit more old school and pulls off a subtle and deep portrayal.One that fills up your heart but also keeps your brain active.Humor comes in here and there, with a very easy flow and steady pace.Not for a single moment do you perceive the movie as dull.Helena Bonham Carter is good.Guy Pearce is appropriate, though he does look a bit too casual at times(maybe that was an intentional character flaw).Most of the movie had been filmed indoors, albeit with eloquent art direction.But the occasional sequences shot outside had been filmed very beautifully, portraying a very dreamy picture of the then England.Sometimes, the camera goes in too close to the characters, and stays there for a while, just long enough to give us a sense of suffocation, quite an artistic equivalent of a speech disorder!But then again, negative shades had been whitewashed with joyous ones and you never perceive it as a dark movie.Direction wise, Tom Hooper is bang on!This is the kind of a movie where you want to give a lot of credit to the director.The set-up is such that the dramatic elements are high but needs to be tamed, so that it doesn't goes over board.And Mr.Hooper hits the bulls eye!Perfect balance.All points considered, it's a brilliant movie and a must watch.Even now, the die is being cast.By 5pm today Pacific Time(1am tomorrow GMT), academicians will have lodged the last of their Oscar votes.On Sunday, these may or may not provide The King's Speech with the coronation so many expect.Yet even if, in spite of that avalanche of nominations, this doesn't happen, perhaps it won't matter all that much.This film can manage without Hollywood's ultimate accolade.It's built its own legend already.本片不止獲得了盛贊的影評、無數的獎項和驚人的票房收入。它讓人們在街道上排隊等待觀影、在播放演職員表時起立鼓掌。本片是英國人熱衷于拍攝的那種低成本歷史劇，沒有什么特效。因此其成功顛覆了許多傳統看法。

It's not just the ecstatic reviews, the sackload of awards and the startling box office takings.This is a film that's had people queuing around the block to see it and standing up to applaud as the credits roll.Yet it's a low-budget costume piece of the kind the Brits have delivered so often before to no particular effect.Its triumph has therefore shattered much conventional wisdom.普遍看法是，如今不再有觀眾在大銀幕上觀看小成本戲劇。老影迷已經滅絕。英國電影別指望賺大錢：本土市場不夠廣闊；需要資金雄厚的投資商，但無從覓得；公共資助不足，而且投資者不知如何挑選優勝者；同時即便有優秀影片誕生，它們也進不了本土影院，遑論出口海外了。2 We were told that these days, there's no longer a big-screen audience for small-scale drama.That older cinemagoers have become extinct.That Britflicks shouldn't expect to hit the jackpot: our home market's not large enough;deep-pocketed investors are needed but can't be found;there isn't enough public funding, and those who disburse what there is don't know how to pick winners;while even if the right films were to get made, they couldn't get into our own cinemas, let alone the rest of the world's.現在英國人打開了眼界，但為了從此經驗中受益，英國人還需要知道：為什么《國王的演講》如此成功？

We've now learned different, but to benefit from this lesson, there's something we need to know.Just why has The King's Speech been such a success? 業內專家并不知道答案，因為他們并沒有預料到本片的勝利。現在，他們會推崇Prescience公司和英國電影協會等投資方的遠見、四象限受眾選擇法、針對評獎季的定位、Momentum公司和英國分銷商的卓越營銷，以及美國同行溫斯坦兄弟機智的搭橋引線。不過他們也承認除此以外還有更多原因。We've now learned different, but to benefit from this lesson, there's something we need to know.Just why has The King's Speech been such a success? 于是，和許多評論家（以及電影藝術與科學學院獎的提名者）一樣，這些專家表示他們相信本片有杰出的表演、精致的劇本、優秀的美術指導以及動人的攝影、服裝、剪輯、作曲和混音。然而，即使你相信所有這些好評都不算過譽，但從什么時候開始電影只要夠出色就能被大眾接受呢？我們現在不是在談論一部經典電影（本片還不夠老），我們討論的是一部大賣電影。大賣電影往往要引發共鳴，而不僅僅是鋪陳其優點。

So, like many of the critics(and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominators), they point to what they deem to be magnificent acting, a fine script, classy production design and, for that matter, impressive cinematography, costumes, editing, score and sound-mix.Yet, even if you're sure that all this esteem isn't at least a little excessive, since when was mere excellence enough to bring in the crowds? We're not talking about a classic(yet);we're discussing a hit.And those tend to strike a chord, not just parade merit.《國王的演講》導演湯姆·霍伯認為本片和《阿凡達》一樣是在挖掘相同的跨文化理念。好吧，那到底是什么理念？

The film's director, Tom Hooper, has opined that The King's Speech appears to be mining the same cross-cultural myths as the likes of Avatar.OK, so what myths are we talking about? 一位美國分析師以《功夫夢》為范例，在本片中準確找到10個關鍵元素，證明本片就是披著一線大片外皮的B級片，和其他類似電影一樣受他鄙視。對于小說家米歇爾·羅伯茨而言，本片就是關于性別的：“從藝術手法上講，有缺陷的國王象征了所有普通人，當他重獲話語權時，就能恢復所有力量。繼而他可以領導人民去戰斗。”

An American analyst has identified 10 key elements that locate the film firmly in the paradigm of The Karate Kid, thus revealing it to be a B-movie story decked out “in A-list rags”, like other such exercises he disdains.For novelist Michèle Roberts, it's all about gender: “The damaged king, who by artistic sleight of hand is Everyman, can be restored to full potency when he gets his voice back.Then he can lead his people into war.” 你被說服了吧？這就是麻煩所在：任何人都可以發表意見。如果你要用個人偏見來支持自己的理論，那么要如何證明你錯了？詢問影迷也沒有多大作用，因為許多理論會臆斷影迷們擁有一些潛意識反應，而且即便影迷認識到這種反應存在也可能不肯承認。不過，有一些常見的對電影的詮釋好像非常合理。

Persuaded yet? That's the trouble with this game.Anyone can play.If you want to fuel your theory with your own prejudices, who's to prove you wrong? There's not even much point in asking cinemagoers, since many theories will assume subconscious responses which their owners might not own up to even if they were aware of them.Still, some frequently offered interpretations seem perfectly commonsensical.也許這就是一個講述克服逆境的簡單故事，其情節嚴格遵守《熱帶驚雷》中深刻闡明的道理：主角要有缺陷，但不能完全是白癡。或者它就是普通的男性友情電影，捎帶描繪一點階級對立、奇跡還有“每個成功的男人背后都有一個偉大的女人”。這些主題都挺俗，本片似乎沒像其他電影那樣強調這些主題。

Perhaps it's a straightforward matter of triumph over adversity, with the tale adhering strictly to the rule so memorably spelt out in Tropic Thunder: “Never go full retard.” Or it's a standard bromance, with a bit of class war table-turning and behind-every-successful-man-there's-a-strong-woman.All of these may be popular themes, but this film seems to deploy them less emphatically than plenty of others have done.于是我們必須考慮故事背景，轉變為更獨特、更具時代精神的觀念。在部分被本片激怒的左撇子人群眼中，蕭條世道所誘發的懷舊情緒“使得深為復古的《國王的演講》受到過度的贊譽”。一些人則將本片受贊賞歸因于“唐頓莊園綜合癥”，即華美服飾對受資本主義壓迫的受害者有著過度的吸引力。其實應該是皇家服飾本身（我們在觀賞“電影版的皇室婚禮”）讓這些觀眾更為敏感。而且本片本可以展示浮華得多的場面，或許其有限的預算支持拍攝出壯觀得多的景象。1 Consideration must therefore turn to the more glamorous, zeitgeisty notions that have been tossed into the frame.Nostalgia generated by hard times “accounts for the excess of admiration heaped on the deeply retro The King's Speech”, in the eyes of at least one of the lefties that the film has annoyed.Some such thinkers blame the “Downton Abbey syndrome”, that is, the perverse attraction of the trappings of poshness for the downtrodden victims of capitalist excess.That these should actually be the accoutrements of royalty itself(we're watching “a sort of cinematic royal wedding”)provokes even deeper alarm.Yet the film dwells on grandiose spectacle far less than it might have done, or perhaps than its limited budget would have allowed.人們相信社會同一性將消亡，于是民族自豪感得到了重振。對影片的這樣一種詮釋讓一部分人痛苦，又讓另一部分人歡欣。梅爾文·布拉格說：“在該電影的最后幾分鐘里，和我周圍許多人一樣，我深深地感動了。我覺得我們或者因為失去曾經的擁有而悲痛，或者在希冀能有所保留。我們希望自己獨一無二而且被獨立看待，這是很正常的。”1

The revival of national pride as a reaction to the supposed dissolution of social identity is another explanation that also distresses some.Still, it much cheers others.Here's Melvyn Bragg: “It seemed to me in the final minutes of that film, when like many around me I was deeply moved, that we either mourn the loss of what we had or wish to retain a version of it.Not unusually we want to be unique and to be seen to be unique.” 或許應該注意到，戰時觀眾為出現在新聞短片里的喬治六世鼓掌，就好像當代英國人為《國王的演講》鼓掌一樣。不過，本片不止打動了英國人。它在海外賺到的票房是在本土的三倍。其中大部分來自美國，試圖解釋其原因的利基理論比比皆是。本片被認為“隱喻了奧巴馬——又一位在艱難時期用話語感動人民，而被贊美、尊敬和崇拜的領導者”。1 It should perhaps be noted that wartime audiences applauded the real George VI's newsreel appearances just as our own applaud The King's Speech.Still, this film hasn't clicked only with the British.It's taken three times as much money overseas as it has here.Most of that's come from America, and niche theories as to why this should be so abound.The film's been considered “an allegory for the age of Barack Obama, another leader who has been celebrated, venerated, lionised for his ability, in challenging times, to move people with his words”.另一看法是，據說美國人很樂于看到區區殖民地百姓強硬對抗狂妄的英國佬（英國佬現在仍膽敢小看曾經附屬國的臣民）。更重要的是，本片被認為是在頌揚來自新大陸的親切隨和、直白奔放的價值觀和信仰，能治愈陳腐的歐洲人那呆板頑固的文化。“本片講述的不是治療口吃，而是治療思想，”一位專家表示，“友誼對于伯蒂而言是有待探索的未知領域。洛格使伯蒂變得完善。”一些年輕英國人出人意料地喜歡此片，他們可能也喜歡這個觀點。他們可能從片中看到了對老一代人粗暴態度的反抗。

Alternatively, Americans have been said to rejoice at seeing a mere colonial socking it to the snotty Brits, who still dare to look down on their former imperial subjects.More fundamentally, the film's been seen as celebrating the new world's informal, touchy-feely values and faith in therapy at the expense of the stiff-upper-lip culture of the stuffy Europeans.“This is not about fixing a voice, but fixing a mind,” notes one savant.“Friendship is a voyage into the unknown for Bertie.[Lionel] Logue is gluing him together.” Some of the younger Brits who've been unexpectedly keen on the film may also have liked this angle.They may see it as a rejection of the oppressive attitudes of the older generation.也許現在你有如下想法：《國王的演講》顯然結合了許許多多很有效的元素，一定就是這些元素單獨的影響力累積起來，最后征服了觀眾。或者，你可能會總結認為該片有如此多吸引人之處，每個人總會為其中一處而著迷；所以本片愛好者是由多個完全不同的群體組成的。

Time, perhaps, to take a breath.Maybe by now you're thinking one of two things.The King's Speech clearly presses an impressive number of highly effective buttons.Surely it must be the cumulative effect of all these separate impacts that induces audiences to succumb.Or, you may be concluding that the film has so many attractive aspects that almost everybody will be beguiled by at least one of them;the throng of enthusiasts is therefore made up of entirely disparate sub-groups.我們可以很容易地從這些分析中找到自己認可的一種，但也許每一種分析都有一點站不住腳。如果回顧那些偉大的電影，從《亂世佳人》到《ET》，或者從《音樂之聲》到《大白鯊》，我們也很難認同它們只是各種成功元素的大雜燴。總的來看，熱門電影不是知道很多事的狐貍，而是知道一件大事的刺猬。（此比喻源自古希臘詩人阿寄洛克思。）那么，既然說了這么多他人的意見，下面我也來試試解開本片成功的奧秘。

It's easy to adopt either of these analyses, but perhaps each is a bit of a cop-out.When you look back at cinema's great successes, from Gone with the Wind to ET, or The Sound of Music to Jaws, it's hard to believe that any of them can be put down to a mere ragbag of ingredients.On the whole, the big-screen hit turns out to be not a fox that knows many things, but a hedgehog that knows one big one.So, since everyone else seems to have had a go, here's my stab at the riddle inside the enigma.本片的故事的確很有力而且講得動聽，但也并不特別。在我看來，是片中的政治內容將它提升到了現有高度。

This is indeed a robust and well-executed human story, but it's not an exceptional one.For my money, it's the political dimension that's taken it into the stratosphere.本片塑造了一個領導人，而且其上映適逢歐美領導人令許多民眾感到失望。民眾已心知肚明不能指望那些領導人來解決問題，但還是希望他們至少盡其所能。然而相反的，從英國到阿拉伯，那些領導人證明了他們只為自己考慮。而伯蒂只想盡自己的職責。為了做到這一點，他愿意承受辛勞和侮辱。但他甚至不會去行使權力，因為他的命運是成為君主，但不是支配國家。

The film is about a leader, and it comes at a time when many of us feel that our leaders have let us down.We've learned that we can't expect them to solve our problems, but we'd at least like them to do their best.Yet from Westminster to the Arab world, they've been demonstrating that instead, they're in it for themselves.Bertie, on the other hand, wants only to do his duty.To achieve this, he's prepared to submit himself to both exertion and indignity.In return, he won't even get to exercise power, since he's destined to reign, not rule.倫敦市長鮑里斯·約翰遜認為《國王的演講》的成功，體現了對世襲制的廣泛支持。從某種意義上說，他可能是正確的。英國人已經認識到，民主制需要候選的領導人作出虛假的承諾，當然，他們不可能兌現這些承諾。伯蒂沒有必要承諾什么，因此也不需要拋棄他的誠信。Boris Johnson sees the success of The King's Speech as demonstrating popular support for the hereditary principle.In one sense, he could be right.We've come to realise that democracy requires potential leaders to make us false promises;naturally they then fail to fulfil them.Bertie has no need to make promises, and thus no need to forgo his integrity.伯蒂與我們所知的大部分領導人不同（他的對手希特勒是個典型），因為他不想要權力。人們和電影一樣，更喜歡主人公有充分理由不情緣做主人公。人們常說，越貪心就越得不到。下議院議長根據儀式挪到他椅子上時不情不愿不是沒有理由的。

He differs from most of the leaders we know of(archetypally Hitler, his antagonist)in that he doesn't want the job.People, like films, prefer reluctance in a hero with good reason.It's often been said that to want the top job should be enough to disqualify someone from actually getting it.Not for nothing is the speaker of the House of Commons ritually dragged unwillingly to his chair.伯蒂的弱點使我們感到親切，而不會有損他在隆重儀式上的魅力，當然如果上I'm a Celebrity這種電視節目時就不一樣了。雖然他是貴族，但他沒成為伯靈頓俱樂部的公子哥兒，他并不擁有一切天然優勢。與那些公子不同，即使某事物不再吸引他，他也會堅持下去。當然他的兄弟就放棄了，就像我們也會遺憾地癡迷于個人的權利欲望。

Bertie's vulnerability shows him to be one of us without negating the pomp that lends him glamour, as might an appearance on I'm a Celebrity.Though he's blue-blooded, he's not one of our own Bullingdon toffs, already blessed with every advantage that life can bestow.And unlike them, he won't be walking away if the game ceases to appeal to him.His brother, of course, does just that, his behaviour foreshadowing our own unfortunate obsession with personal rights and cravings.總之，我認為《國王的演講》代替了現實生活中將令我們賣力鼓掌的演講。當然這是一家之言。In short, The King's Speech stands in for the real-life speech that we're all desperate to applaud.But what do I know?

第二篇：《國王的演講》英文影評

A review of One Flew Over the Cuckoo`s nest There is a widespread anecdote : A frog is placed in boiling water, it will jump out, but if it is placed in cold water that is slowly heated, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death.This story called The boiling frog.And One Flew Over the Cuckoo`s nest just demonstratses this phenomena.People in the cuckoo`s nest just like this frog who get accustoumed to the life that is schedualled and controlled by others and lose the courage to leave.And it takes a lot to go out this slowly heated water.People in the cuckoo`s nest who are compelled to eat medicine and listen harsh music and are not allowed to watch the ball game are threated badly.Although they always complain about the Cuckoo`s nest ,it never occurred that they want to flew over this disgusting place.They has adapted to the life of being principled ,and their awareness of resistance has died out.When Memurphy comes to there ,he begins to resist the authority of nurse Ralched by claiming to turn down the music and change the schedual to watch the ball game and bring people outside to go fishing.At last , the chief`s awareness of resistence comes to be aroused and leave this water that is slowly heated successfully.My review of The King`s Speech The success of the king`s speech lies in his strong perseverance as well as an equal and trustful relationship has been built between the king and Dr Longue.There is no doubt that the king is a man with a strong will,which is one factor of his success.In order to overcome his stuttering problem,he meets many doctors and suffers a lot,but he always doesn`t give up.At the beginning of the film,he puts up with the suffer of insertingr seven marbles,which gets him angry at last.He still goes to see Dr Longue although he has told his wife not to introduce any doctors to him.Besides,he insists on repeating tongue twisters even when he goes out to persuade his brother David.Another factor is that there is a relationship with total equality and trust.Owing to the king is faithful in Lionel,he can accept his special

methods

without

hesitation,such

as jumping ,shouting ,rolling on the ground,ect..Due to the equality and trust,the king considers Lionel as his friend,and shares what he has experienced when he was a child and his fear of his father and brother.So that Lionel gives the king faith in his voice and makes him believe in himself through communication with the king and stimulation by siting on Saint Edward`s chair.Therefore,the king can have courage to give a successful speech and becomes the symbol of nation resistence.

第三篇：國王的演講 英文影評

Shining Friends

Besides your family and your relatives, who will help you without any paid? Who will inspire you when you are disappointed? Who will always beside you when you are impecunious? Who will remind you of continuing hard work when you get dizzy with success? The answer is apparent: real friends.Life with a bosom friend is sufficient.I do really agree with this saying after I watch the movie The King’s Speech.The King’s Speech is a biopic about how King George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth II, overcame his stuttering problem with the help of a little-known Australian speech therapist named Lionel Logue.Bertie, King George VI, is a fatherly, responsible but self-abased and irritable prince.Lionel, an Australian speech therapist out of professor is a calm, wise and affectionate old man.When the two men of different character meet because the duchess recommends Lionel to cure the king’s stuttering interesting things happen.When they first meet, Lionel insists on calling himself Lionel and calling the prince Bertie, which is immediately objected by the prince.But at last, the prince accepts Lionel’s special teaching method and treats him as a friend.This is a movie without an antagonist.The strongest enemy that King George VI must confront and beat is himself.When he is a prince, he is expected too much but he is never too stressful to escape;on the contrary, he is familiar with national affairs and international situation and he cares much about his people than his brother Edward who is expected to get to throne at first.In his subconsciousness, he wants to be a1

good king and be affirmed by his father, but he shrinks because his stuttering.Lionel absolutely knows his king and endeavors to cure him and encourage him to confront himself.As all of the friends in the world, Lionel and King George VI have quarrels, after which they come together.It is no doubt that King George VI treats Lionel to be his real friend;otherwise he won’t let Lionel call himself Bertie which is the proprietary rights of his family, he won’t leak his miserable childhood to Lionel, he won’t swallow his pride to apologize to Lionel and he won’t insist on Lionel to be his consultant after he knows that Lionel is not a doctor.Lionel treats King George VI to be his friend rather than a king;otherwise he won’t ask for equal and always behaves unhurriedly, he won’t say something poignant to the king for the sake of his friend.A friend in need is a friend indeed.There two themes which move me deeply.One is that after King George V’ death Bertie comes to Lionel’s to pour out his tormented;when he thanks Lionel, Lionel says “what are friends for”.Only real friends will say this because they want to help you but never expect rewards.The other is that when King George VI has only 40 minutes to prepare his speech and he needs his friend Lionel who asks the driver to drive to the palace as fast as possible in spite of the fighter plane’s flying above him.Maybe the best best friend is someone who cares about you more than himself.Their truehearted friendship reminds me of some lyrics in the song Shining Friends: See my smile, my friendship.We are with you, holding hands, you have got to believe you are my destiny.We are meant to be your friends.That’s what a friendship should be.I think they are shining friends of each other.The King’s Speech is a biographical movie but not a boring one.Besides the impressive friendship, it also contains many wonderful elements, for instance, visual performance of its actors like Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush and Helena Bonham Carter, winding plot, real background and suitable costumes.The King’s Speech is thought highly by people and it receives 4 awards from Oscar, including best film, best director, best actor and best original screenplay.In my opinion, it is love that accomplish this movie;love between friends, between husband and wife, between father and daughters, these are the most affecting plots.The King’s Speech presents the background of that time to us, tells us how to confront defects of ourselves and annotates us what bosom friends are.In relief, it definitely lives up to its frame.

第四篇：國王的演講影評

國王的演講影評

摘下王冠，Bertie只是一個因為童年陰影致使失去自信，脾氣暴躁而且口吃的普通人。但當他給兩個女兒講故時是的那份極其努力，看著他那份執著，你真恨不得替他說出來！正是這種執著，凸顯了他的人格偉大。也正是這種偉大的人格，當他面臨著絕大的責任承擔起一個國王在國家危難時應該承擔的一切責任時，他勇敢地肩負起這一份重擔！

作為約克郡公爵的Bertie第一次在公開場合亮相。在全場觀眾的注視下，麥克風將他的口吃無限放大，同時也往他作為一個有身體缺陷的人脆弱的心里再撒一把鹽。而第二次面對演講稿是在父親喬治五世圣誕演講后，特意讓Bertie練習剛發表的演講稿。在父親的嚴厲斥責下，他不由自主的縮緊胳膊。再明顯不過的，又一次掙扎著吐不出字。

古羅馬哲學家塞捏卡說：“真正的偉大，即在于以脆弱的凡人之軀而具有神性的不可戰勝。”

海明威說：“人生來不是要給打敗的，你可以毀滅他,但是不可以打敗他。” 在語言治療師萊昂納爾（Lionel Logue）的幫助下，通過一系列的訓練兩人成為好友，國王Bertie的口吃也大為好轉，隨后他發表了著名的圣誕講話，鼓舞了當時二戰中的英國軍民。

在影片中，作為一個國王的成長故事，所有跌宕起伏的經歷終將在皇家外表的金碧輝煌中沉淀下來，成為一段鮮為人知的歷史。而對于外界的所有評價，無論褒貶與否都只是過眼云煙。所要在乎的，唯有自己有否曾經真正努力，去戰勝從前那個不成熟的自己。

很多時候，我們也需要這樣。當我們與別人進行比較，往往會懊惱自己的不足，而不曾想過我們最大的敵人不是別人，而其實就是自己，我們只要和現在的自己比過去的自己比，優秀就好，這樣就會越加地完美。片中的國王就是典型的代表，他口吃得厲害，卻勇于挑戰自己，戰勝自己，最終取得了成功。我想現實中的我們每個人都應該這樣勇于挑戰過去的自己，一點一點進步，一點一點改變，讓自己更加完美！

而影片中，我最感動的是Bertie和Lionel Logue的友情。每個人的成長中總得有也總會有那么一兩個人在鼓勵扶持著你，并非因為身份，而只是純粹因為信賴。對于Bertie, Lionel就是那一個人。正如Lionel所說，“This fellow would be somebody great, he just afraid of his own shadow.”他的確有資格成為偉人，而不是龜縮在自己的精神世界中無法自拔。

因而，在生活中，像Bertie有著“口吃”的人很多，但是我們并一定會像不Bertie那樣幸運，有著十分支持你的朋友和無限大的權利，但是我們可以做到像Bertie一樣的成功，那就是改變自己的心態——從躲在黑暗的“小小自我”，走向充滿陽光的“大大的自己”！

第五篇：國王的演講影評

In this movie, the actor's performance is very good.in close-up shots, we can see clearly that Colin's lips are tense and irregular.He tried to read the words, but he blushed because he can’t speak them.Facing with Lionel's deliberate aggression, he made a thunderous retort.George VI's sensitive, fragile and helpless psychology is fully displayed in front of the audience under his performance.Along with Geoffrey, Helena, Timothy and Jennifer, it's undeniable that the acting of the leading actors made the royal film more entertaining.Bertie's first public speech was a failure.Like a wounded hedgehog, Bertie pricks up his thorns and keeps everyone away.The camera did not deliberately describe Bertie's mental state but reflected his inner helplessness and resistance through his words and deeds.The film uses a lot of montage techniques, among which the telescopic lens naturally takes the animation surface to draw.it is even more perfect.The film gives a good description of the details.During the broadcast, Lionel's encouragement and cues to Bertie’s body are different.At the beginning, he helps Bertie to relaxed and checked the speech.Later, he let Bertie read it all by himself.Finally, after the speech, he called Bertie “Mr.King” for the first time.It proving that Bertie had completely defeated herself in the past.he had truly grown into what Lionel had previously called “the bravest person.” When we're growing up, we don't need to care what people say.All we have to care about is whether we have really worked hard to overcome the immature self of the past.