第一篇：關(guān)于安樂死的看法(英語)

20世紀(jì)是人類醫(yī)學(xué)發(fā)展突飛猛進(jìn)的世紀(jì)，人類戰(zhàn)勝了如鼠疫、天花、肺結(jié)核等曾為不治之癥的疾病。但新的“死亡之癥”，如心腦血管病、癌癥、艾滋病等，又給人類帶來更大的痛苦，攻克它們的難度也更大了。經(jīng)過科學(xué)家和醫(yī)務(wù)工作者對這些疾病不懈研究，有很多絕癥患者可以通過一定的治療而延長自己的生存期[2]。

the 20th century is the century of development by leaps and bounds, human medicine human over such as plague, smallpox, tuberculosis was incurable disease.But the new “die of disease”, such as cardio-cerebrovascular disease, cancer, AIDS, etc., and bring more pain to human beings, to overcome their difficulty also bigger.With the constant research of scientists and medical workers to these diseases, there are many terminally ill patients can be treated by a certain and prolong their survival [2].當(dāng)然，這些患者經(jīng)常都要接受復(fù)雜而痛苦的治療，肉體和精神一次又一次地受折磨。與此同時，高科技的醫(yī)療手段帶來昂貴的不堪負(fù)擔(dān)的費(fèi)用，又使照顧和贍養(yǎng)自己的親屬心力交瘁。由于某一具體時期醫(yī)療技術(shù)的極限，治愈的希望是沒有的，患者處于毫無尊嚴(yán)可言的茍延殘喘狀態(tài)。這些患者迫切希望通過無痛苦死亡，即安樂死，來結(jié)束這個狀態(tài)，以使自己和親屬身心得到解脫，而現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)也掌握了足夠的方法能使病人安然死去。Of course, these patients often are complicated and painful treatment, physical and mental suffering again and again.Meanwhile, high-tech medical means to bring the cost of expensive burden, and the care and support their own relatives.Due to the limits of medical technology, a specific period cure, hope is not alive state in patients with no dignity.These patients are eager to die without pain by euthanasia, to end this state, in order to make themselves and the relative physical and mental relief, and modern medicine also mastered enough method can make the patient was dead.

第二篇：關(guān)于安樂死的看法

安樂死指對無法救治的病人停止治療或使用藥物，讓病人無痛苦地死去。“安樂死”一詞源于希臘文，意思是“幸福”的死亡。它包括兩層含義，一是安樂的無痛苦死亡；二是無痛致死術(shù)；我國的定義指患不治之癥的病人在垂危狀態(tài)下，由于精神和軀體的極端痛苦，在病人和其親友的要求下，經(jīng)醫(yī)生認(rèn)可，用人道方法使病人在無痛苦狀態(tài)中結(jié)束生命過程。當(dāng)今社會，關(guān)于安樂死的合法化存在兩大派對峙，一方認(rèn)為安樂死應(yīng)該合法化，另一方認(rèn)為安樂死在目前不應(yīng)該合法化。前者的理由是對備受疾病折磨的人飽有同情心，認(rèn)為安樂死更符合人道主義。后者站在同意前者的觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上，考慮到使安樂死合法化會導(dǎo)致給“故意殺人”提供了借口和庇護(hù)。

盡管安樂死至今還沒有在多數(shù)國家合法化，但人們對給予病情危重而又無法治愈的病人以死的權(quán)力和自由以擺脫殘酷的病痛折磨的做法，愈來愈多地采取同情的態(tài)度，認(rèn)為這是符合人道主義精神的。

持肯定態(tài)度的學(xué)者認(rèn)為安樂死必須符合下列條件：

①從現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)知識和技術(shù)上看，病人患不治之癥并已臨近死期；

②病人極端痛苦，不堪忍受；

③必須是為解除病人死前痛苦，而不是為親屬、國家、社會利益而實(shí)施；

④必須有病人神志清醒時的真誠囑托或同意；

⑤原則上必須由醫(yī)師執(zhí)行；

⑥必須采用社會倫理規(guī)范所承認(rèn)的妥當(dāng)方法。

持否定態(tài)度的則認(rèn)為安樂死有悖生存權(quán)利。首先，在現(xiàn)有的法律條件下，“安樂死”可能引致“故意殺人”。患者自殺不會影響別人，但是，如果他本人想結(jié)束生命，醫(yī)護(hù)人員及家屬協(xié)助滿足其請求，在《刑法》中是“幫助自殺”行為，涉嫌故意殺人罪。其二，“安樂死”如果以法律形式確認(rèn)下來，可能會被一些人利用，用以非法剝奪他人的生命。另外，在人類對疾病的認(rèn)識還十分有限的情況下，未經(jīng)法律許可而結(jié)束他人生命，有悖于生存權(quán)利的道德準(zhǔn)則。

“安樂死”要實(shí)現(xiàn)真正意義上的立法，一個前提基礎(chǔ)必須具備，即在最后選擇這種結(jié)果的時候，應(yīng)該保證這些公民是因?yàn)殡y以擺脫疾病給身心帶來的痛苦，而不是因?yàn)閱适е委煓C(jī)會而產(chǎn)生的心理絕望使然。如果國家沒有能力向百分百的患病公民提供這種救治機(jī)會與兜底的福利制度，“安樂死”的立法就缺乏足夠的社會立法基礎(chǔ)。否則，這將可能意味著一種不道德的人性災(zāi)難。

從倫理方面講，公民在遭遇非常的不可逆的身體疾病痛苦，自愿要求結(jié)束自己生命的條件下實(shí)施“安樂死”，本身也是合乎道德的。

從歷史的趨勢來看,安樂死的合法化，勢在必行,只不過是時間與實(shí)施細(xì)則問題。一旦安樂死立法，它就像橫在病人面前的一把雙面刃，用得好，就可以真正解除病人的痛苦；用得不好，就可能成為剝奪病人選擇生命權(quán)利的借口，被不法不義之徒濫用。

科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展使過去難以存活的不正常嬰幼兒可靠先進(jìn)技術(shù)存活下來，當(dāng)然,其生活的質(zhì)量是低下的,他們還可能成為社會的負(fù)擔(dān)。一般說，如果發(fā)現(xiàn)出生不久的嬰兒有嚴(yán)重的生理或智力缺陷，現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)確實(shí)無法補(bǔ)救，且這個缺陷將嚴(yán)重影響嬰兒目前或今后的生活質(zhì)量，在此情況下，如果其法定監(jiān)護(hù)人不愿維持其生命時，醫(yī)生可以接受監(jiān)護(hù)人的意見停止其生命的維持措施的話，我認(rèn)為是剝奪了這些嬰幼兒生命權(quán)。哪怕他們智力是底下的，也沒有任何人有權(quán)利剝奪智力底下群體的生命。因?yàn)椴豢赡苷f因?yàn)橹橇Φ紫露蔀榱松鐣呢?fù)擔(dān)的人就活該去死，否則將重蹈覆轍納粹的罪過——安樂死的再次提出，并大肆宣傳和廣泛推行，發(fā)生在1930年代的納粹德國。實(shí)際上，納粹分子是在安樂死的借口下，實(shí)行種族滅絕政策。

我認(rèn)為公民個人有權(quán)選擇生存的方式，在特定條件下也有權(quán)選擇死亡的方式。如果一個人已全身癱瘓，大小便失禁，甚至無法進(jìn)食，每天承受著心靈和肉體上的折磨，那么，讓他安靜祥和地離去又有什么不應(yīng)該呢？安樂死是最大限度地展示出病痛、生病垂危、死亡這一生命過程的應(yīng)有尊嚴(yán)。它保證了個人在生命最后一刻所作出的隊(duì)生命的自主和自決的權(quán)利。

如果不讓安樂死合法化是因?yàn)樗嵏擦艘恢币詠淼膫惱恚屪訉O扣上不孝的罪名，那我認(rèn)為這就大錯特錯了。如果子孫只是為了贏得一個美名，而讓自己的親人生不如死地生活著煎熬著，難道這還是一種孝道嗎？所以，我認(rèn)為在倫理上考慮安樂死不能合法化的觀點(diǎn)是站不住腳的。

但安樂死的合法化確實(shí)是一個艱辛過程，因?yàn)樗M可能地將各種情況都考慮在內(nèi)，要頒布盡可能詳細(xì)且嚴(yán)格的實(shí)施細(xì)則，否則它將成為“故意殺人”的工具。但絕對不能因?yàn)樗斜弧肮室鈿⑷恕崩玫目赡芫头艞壈矘匪篮戏ɑ倪M(jìn)程，就像不能因?yàn)樗赌軞⑷司筒辉试S市場上銷售水果刀一樣。路是要走的，不能因?yàn)榈缆飞铣錆M了荊棘就不走了，取而代之的是，我們要披荊斬棘地前行。

安樂死合法化勢在必行，不能再讓它繼續(xù)沉默，我們要正面它正視它，積極主動地研究出解決問題的辦法，而不是對其置之不理。

第三篇：英語作文(安樂死)

The protagonist of the “Death doctor” is a very special doctor, his work is send these people who are suffering pain and incurable patients calm into heaven, rather than to save the dying patients.However, his practice is contrary to the traditional values of the United States, therefore, it’s controversial and criticized.The furore was over when jack has been sentenced to prison.However, the debate on euthanasia is still continuing.This is a film that deals with medical reform and euthanasia.The biggest argument in the film is the right to life and death, especially death.According to customary law, suicide is indeed a crime.Jack argues that this is a chaotic medieval darkness, should be completely abandoned, the process of law is too slow, euthanasia in many countries such as Europe have been supported, why in the United States which claims to be dominated by democracy and freedom, is still subject to those stupid medieval customary law, subject to people backward thinking.Everyone has the freedom to pursue a better life, and everyone has the power to choose the end of life.From the humanitarian point of view, I can not deny the correctness of euthanasia.The ultimate pain of the body will completely deprive all the meaning and pleasure of a person's life, which is not the same as the spiritual distortions.It's hard to imagine that you're still trying to accuse her of violating ethics by calling her immoral.The health of the disease before and after the twisted shape formed a very sharp contrast.In any case are not cured, linger to live, it is better to leave as soon as possible calm.As a doctor, he knows how to respect life.And the young athlete, because after the injury can not continue his beloved movement, which into a severe depression, that life is meaningless, he asked to be euthanized, but the application was rejected by Jack.As a doctor, he still knows how precious his life is.Now, there are many Chinese who need Jack's death doctor to “save” the people, but how many relatives agree with the patient as early as heaven? I think life is not how long can be happy, is whether to do their own responsibility, only their own responsibility to do so before they can be worthy of the day, overlooking ashamed.I do not want euthanasia to get the support of the majority, but if that day really comes, I have nothing to complain about, because everyone has their own choice, and I will respect what they think is the right choice.

第四篇：安樂死_英語辯論

(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he is reasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.結(jié)尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s life means the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。feeling helpless because he is at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking.It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing.Some people think it is right.but others dont think so.now let us listen to everyone's different opinions 安樂死是醫(yī)學(xué)界最有爭議的問題之一。正如上面所示的視頻所描繪的，一位晚期患病母親病入膏肓，請求兒子實(shí)施安樂死。但兒子且為此獲罪，感到無能為力，因?yàn)樗麄儾恢涝撛趺崔k。這幅畫確實(shí)發(fā)人深省。它暗示，人們在對待安樂死上看法不一致。有些人認(rèn)為他是對的，但其他的不這樣認(rèn)為，現(xiàn)在讓我們聽聽大家的不同觀點(diǎn)

贊成

1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.如果一個人失去了生存能力，對社會沒有了貢獻(xiàn)，也就失去了生命的意義，減少對別人的倚賴和對社會的負(fù)擔(dān)。

2.the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful diseases, mental stress and depression thinking exists.安樂死可以徹底消除病人的疾病痛苦，精神壓力和思想懮愁

3.a person bound to die sooner or later die;One hundred dead, the living dead are free, patients and relatives reflex happy 人總難免一死，早晚都是死；一死百了，死人活人都解脫，患者與親朋皆大歡

4.the lives of their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives, which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.人的生命屬于自己，個人有權(quán)結(jié)束生命，這是個人自由和獨(dú)享的人權(quán)

5.we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式。

6.首先，從主觀方面來講，安樂死對于病人自身，是一種減少生命痛苦的方式。人，總是趨利避害的，沒有人會說“我要去尋找痛苦，我要去遠(yuǎn)離快樂”。當(dāng)一個人處于精神和軀體的極端痛苦之下，當(dāng)生命的存在已成為一場噩夢，我們難道還要 提及道德和倫理嗎？生存這個基本的“長度”都已經(jīng)不能夠維持，還要來談及生命的寬度，還要去顧及倫理的重量嗎？

First,from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, ”I am going to look painful, I had to go far from happy.“When a person is under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the moral and ethical?The basic survival of the ”length“ are not able to maintain, but also to talk about the breadth of life,we still have to take into account the weight of ethics?

7.We feel this suffering, we have come with this then you have no choice in the circumstances, we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt for life, nor is it moral decline.Instead, it was a time in the lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore, we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.我們感受著這種痛苦，我們體會著這個中滋味，在無法選擇的情況下，我們選擇了安樂死。這不是對生命的藐視，也不是道德的淪喪。反而，這是一種

在生命面臨煎熬和磨難的時候，為我們身邊的親人，為我們愛著的人，選擇另一條更容易接受的道路。因此，我方認(rèn)為，安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式.反對

1.Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life 安樂死是拒絕了人類生活的意義和價值

2，”euthanasia" if legal form confirm down, may be some people use to depriving the life of others.In addition, to the understanding of the disease in humans is still very limited circumstances, without legal license and others end life, contrary to the right to live moral principles.“安樂死”如果以法律形式確認(rèn)下來，可能會被一些人利用，用以非法剝奪他人的生命。另外，在人類對疾病的認(rèn)識還十分有限的情況下，未經(jīng)法律許可而結(jié)束他人生命，有悖于生存權(quán)利的道德準(zhǔn)則。

3.Oppose euthanasia people have argued that the euthanasia is a violation of the laws of nature and death against natural behavior, weaken the human overcome the disaster of the strength and courage.反對安樂死合法化的人士則認(rèn)為，安樂死是違反生老病死自然規(guī)律的反自然行為，削弱了人類戰(zhàn)勝災(zāi)難的力量和勇氣。

4.Euthanasia is disguised violations of the right to life 安樂死是變相侵害生命權(quán)

第五篇：英語作文：安樂死

（1）有利于病人的自身利益。

（2）從生命價值原則出發(fā)，醫(yī)學(xué)教育`網(wǎng)搜集整理人應(yīng)該尊重生命，同時也應(yīng)該接受死亡。

（3）有利于衛(wèi)生資源的公正分配

Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, a late-stage cancer patient is terminally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing.But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking.It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing.Some people think that physician-assisted suicide can relieve dying patients of unbearable pain and suffering.They maintain that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death.Others are strongly opposed to physician-assisted suicide.They contend that a doctor has no right to give a patient sufficie nt medication to control his pain if that may hasten death.They conclude that

it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I’m concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering.I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients.In short, I am in favor of mercy killing.(207 words)

譯文：

安樂死是醫(yī)學(xué)界最有爭議的問題之一。正如上面所示的畫所描繪的，一位晚期癌癥病人病入膏肓，請求醫(yī)生們實(shí)施安樂死。但醫(yī)生們看上去十分尷尬，感到無能為力，因?yàn)樗麄儾恢涝撛趺崔k。

這幅畫確實(shí)發(fā)人深省。它暗示，人們在對待安樂死上看法不一致。有些人認(rèn)為，醫(yī)助自殺可以減輕垂死病人不堪忍受的痛苦。他們主張，只要醫(yī)生開藥是為了合法的醫(yī)療目的，那么即使病人使用這種藥物加速了死亡，醫(yī)生也沒有做什么違法的事。其他人則強(qiáng)烈反對醫(yī)助自殺。他們堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為，醫(yī)生無權(quán)給病人開足以控制痛苦的藥物，如果那樣做會加速死亡的話。他們的結(jié)論是，醫(yī)生幫助垂危病人結(jié)束生命是違法的。

依我看，醫(yī)生有義務(wù)幫助垂死病人緩解病痛。我還認(rèn)為，如果醫(yī)生延長了垂死病人不必要的痛苦的話，那他們應(yīng)該受到懲處。總之，我贊成安樂死。